Talk:Frank Popper
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
This reads like an essay or advocacy on behalf of the subject. Tyrenius 15:26, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Well I am not opposed to him. Seems like objective info.
Rydernechvatal 15:51, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Someone removed the last enrty I made on the Frank Popper page - his new: book Ecrire sur l'art : De l'art optique a l'art virtuel, L'Harmattan 2007
I fail to understand the COL tag as I only know Frank very slightly through professional circumstances but yes I respect his work. As do maney.
Rydernechvatal 15:51, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Enlightened Self-Interest
I have looked at the page. I know Joseph Nechvatel. He has a PhD in New Media. He has worked with Frank Popper and knows Poppers' ideas in depth. Frank Popper is an important theorist in both France and the United States concerning technological art. This page is quite enlightening and should stay. --ghovagimyan 74.66.228.210 12:30, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Removing the COL tag
After reading the article and reading the guidance on conflict of interest and neutral point of view I feel that the COL tag should be removed. This is an erudite and studied introduction to Frank Popper and the subject of technological art. What is lacking is a larger discussion of the term Virtual Art. after a search of the term virtual art in wiki I come up with several names and links. Some people such as the head Curator of the largest museum in the world (ZKM) dedicated to new media and digital art, Peter Weibel, has been tagged as suspicious. If you can't trust the actual authorities onthe suject you are discussing who do you trust? Ghovagimyan 13:15, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.
