Talk:Fragile binary interface problem

Although there is a note saying that fragile binary interface problem (FBI) is different from fragile base class problem (FBC), the article itself is mixing the two concepts, especially the first sentence. Even, in the "Solutions" section, it talks inappropriately about FBC. Part of the section should be moved to Fragile base class. The link given should also be moved to Fragile base class.

FBI is not restricted to OO languages; it even has a longer history than OO languages, I think. Application binary interface describes the origin of FBI more appropriately, if I am right, and may be merged with this article.

Many authors refer to the syntactic fragile base class problem (which is what is described as the "fragile binary interface problem" on this page), and the semantic fragile base class problem (described on fragile base class problem).

--EngineerScotty 21:47, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

FBC, FBI being mixed

I agree with the first comment on this article. FBI and FBC, are for most purposes very similar and in this article they claim them to be very different but actually end up describing FBC for the FBI problem.

Exactly, in the solutions section it says: "The best solution to the fragile base class problem is..." while in the lead section it says: "Note: this problem is often confused with the fragile base class problem, which is different, but related." For this reason I have tagged the article with Template:Contradict. --Kprateek88(Talk | Contribs) 13:38, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.