This article was nominated for deletion on 25 June 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I have not yet completed writing this article. I have all content that I intend to put in the article and exactly how I intend to organize it. I do not, however, currently have the time or the technical skills to complete the article speedily. If it is left, I will return to the article and complete it sufficiently in the very, very near future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afiore321 (talk • contribs) 20:09, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This might have a better chance of surviving as an article about the series than it does about the company (or it might not). The refs about the books don't really provide reliable sources about the company. You might want to consider userfying or incubating the article and removing it from the active article area until you can expand it. That will help prevent having to fight continuous deletion battles. Let me add a word of friendly advice: Though it may not look like it on first blush, there are strict policies on what subjects and content can and cannot be included in Wikipedia. Without a working knowledge of Wikipedia policy it can be very frustrating to try to write an article that won't be deleted. I've tried several times to write a better introduction to editing than can be found at the Article Wizard and Your First Article and I can't. Don't be tempted to skip past sections of either one, they're full of solid gold information. Also, if you've not done so already, you need to read the Notability, Verifiability, No original research, What Wikipedia is not, and Conflict of interest policies from beginning to end. Good luck with your editing, TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 20:20, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on For Beginners, LLC. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141016085036/http://www.forbeginnersbooks.com/aboutus.html to http://www.forbeginnersbooks.com/aboutus.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:45, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]