Talk:Fog machine

Haze Generator™

I see lots of ads for Haze Generators™ on the net, but no explanation of how they work. Does anyone here know? --Slashme 06:01, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

See haze machine --Slashme 07:40, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CO2 fog

You cannot make a fog of CO2, it would evaporate imeadiatly. You can use CO2 to make a fog of water. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.196.82.42 (talk) 13:55, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Adverse Health Effects

I updated the "adverse effects" section since the cited studies refer to glycol based fogs and not simple water based fogs. Don't want the local school productions to be afraid of dropping dry ice in some water buckets because of this wiki article. Regards, James Baugh (talk) 14:27, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I confess I tweaked your additions somewhat. Your intro didn't differentiate between water based effects, and "water based" fog fluid, which most of the studies ARE about. Also, as an aside, dry ice CAN be unsafe if you abuse it or don't know what you're doing... DJSparky huh? 22:06, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ultrasonic fog machines

A reference is made to "ultrasonic fog machines" under the 'Adverse Health Effects' section, but no description (or even mention) in the 'Types of Fog Machines' section. 75.93.196.215 (talk) 11:23, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The citation:
"ANSI HE'.5 - 2003, Entertainment Technology - Theatrical Fog Made With Aqueous Solutions Of Di- And Triadic Alcohols F&S/1997-3017r7.5"
leads to a 404 page.
Another citation:
"Gregory E. Raymond, Recommended Exposure Liquid Fogging Agents"
leads to an online store to buy the agents in question, and does not supply any recommendations for exposure. This information is very important for this topic and the reason why I visited this article

Why glycols ?

what is the physical/chemical effect of adding glycol or glycerin to water ?

Couldn't find this clearly explained anywhere, even in patents ...

Thanks !

Goulu 08:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goulu (talk • contribs)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fog machine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:30, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Fog machine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:12, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fog machine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:31, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fog machine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:45, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of PM₂.₅ information

The article currently summarizes several studies on glycol‑based fog exposure, but none of the cited evaluations measured fine particulate matter (PM₂.₅). PM₂.₅ is a major indoor air pollutant of public health concern, consisting of airborne particles small enough to enter the lungs and bloodstream. Relevant sources include:

The fog‑exposure studies referenced in the articles focused on glycol or mineral‑oil aerosols and irritant symptoms, but did not include size‑fractionated particulate measurements:

Since fog machines generate aerosols within the size range that can contribute to PM₂.₅, noting the absence of PM₂.₅ measurements in published studies helps clarify the limits of existing research. A concise PM₂.₅ subsection has been added to reflect this gap, using EPA/WHO for health effects and the existing fog‑exposure studies to show that PM₂.₅ was not measured. Wikiguest1234567 (talk) 12:10, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.