Talk:FinanceWorks
 | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2 January 2010. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Looks like a P.R. piece to me . . .
Surely there are some drawbacks to using this business service. Also it would be nice to know something about its history, who developed it, the problems in rolling it out, etc. It is very unencyclopedic. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 20:15, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, it definitely looks like an advertisement. The whole article is just a bullet-point list of features and quotes. The tiny "Missing Features" section seems like a (less than halfhearted) attempt to appear neutral. And it's very out of date too, as several of those missing features have since been added. Unfortunately, I don't know nearly enough about FinanceWorks to redo the article myself. Rycr (talk) 18:48, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
- Note that the significant contributor to this article was digitalemi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), who is now banned. Vectro (talk) 01:40, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Yes - what about security? I stayed away from MINT for security access concerns. Is this better because it is business to business?
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.