Talk:Favstar
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 25 April 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
I removed half of the text because it was extremly biased
Notable?
The mere presence of this entire article shouts "biased advert". The site tweets replies to famous people cluttering up their streams and conversations. It appears to be nothing more than a SPAM bot. But ultimately, what is noteworthy about it that should give it a wikipedia page? Especially a page without any unbiased, objective views such as the one I've just given here (I'm not famous nor do I receive any tweets from Favstar myself). Surely there has to be some respectable published articles on the web about this apparent SPAM factory. Either notes about opposition and annoyance should be included (assuming they exist) or the article should be deleted. 74.64.126.58 (talk) 21:41, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Evidence #1: A twitter conversation including Ricky Gervais (famous; many followers)
https://twitter.com/rickygervais/status/521047458957500418
Within this conversation, two reply tweets originate from Favstar only 5 minutes apart from each other:
- @rickygervais Congrats on your 250★ tweet! http://favstar.fm/t/521047458957500418 …
- @rickygervais Congrats on your 500★ tweet! http://favstar.fm/t/521047458957500418 …
Not only are they completely off-topic, but they are confusing and disruptive. This is blatant SPAM. 74.64.126.58 (talk) 21:52, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.