Talk:Erythronium

Removing author's names

I don't think whacking author names is a good idea - usually someone went to some trouble to get them in there, and without links to articles where the information might be, the information is simply gone now and will need re-creation later. Stan 23:38, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Stan. While they names really belong in the articles about the individual species, those articles don't exist yet. All we have is one article about a cultivar. Until someone is motivated enough to add an article for each species, let's put the authors back again. Authors are sometimes a pain to put together.Nereocystis 03:30, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Stan as well. We're in the process of describing taxons down to the level of genus, or exceptionally to the level of species (for well-known species). It will probably take many more years before a sufficient number of species have been described. Untill then, let's leave relevant information in the genus article. I propose reverting this article. JoJan 08:21, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 22:10, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.