Talk:Erica Tazel
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Encourage correction and improvement...
...to this first pass over a talented younger actor's page. Note, especially, the citations are limited and redundant as they appear, and no wiki structure has been created to contain the text. Cheers. LeProf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.245.235 (talk) 19:42, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
- I added an "issues" tag ... but I don't know where to start. I'll give this some thought.GcT (talk) 17:50, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- Actually I don't see any real issues here for such s short article. I neither see what "redundant citations" are supposed to be (though the quality of the sources should be improved) nor what "Wiki structure" is supposed to be missing here. Note that the text part of short articles usually doesn't really need any further "structuring".--Kmhkmh (talk) 00:19, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- It's kinda clunky. Maybe the article's shortness is part of what makes worthy of improvement: you can see some standard information is not there. Eh? GcT (talk) 16:09, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- Well, no argument that the article can and ultimatly should be extended, but imho the normal extension process requires no templates. It is perfectly fine to have to have a rather short biographic entry, such a shortness in itself isn't really a quality issue requiring a template. Imho the use of such templates should be restricted to articles with serious issues or at least something ideally requiring immediate attenttion rather than for articles simply having room for improvement and not being an optimal article yet. Because if we tag based on the latter we will end up tagging of 50% of our articles and clog all maintenance/quality improves queues, which in a way defeats the purpose of tagging in the first place.--Kmhkmh (talk) 21:59, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- It's kinda clunky. Maybe the article's shortness is part of what makes worthy of improvement: you can see some standard information is not there. Eh? GcT (talk) 16:09, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- Actually I don't see any real issues here for such s short article. I neither see what "redundant citations" are supposed to be (though the quality of the sources should be improved) nor what "Wiki structure" is supposed to be missing here. Note that the text part of short articles usually doesn't really need any further "structuring".--Kmhkmh (talk) 00:19, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- I added an "issues" tag ... but I don't know where to start. I'll give this some thought.GcT (talk) 17:50, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Potential sources to be used and to replace the tvguide/imdb stuff
- http://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2015/01/justified-final-season-erica-tazel-interview
- http://www.sheknows.com/entertainment/articles/1028939/interview-with-justifieds-erica-tazel
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIDmo0DavTg
- http://www.zap2it.com/blogs/justifieds_erica_tazels_parents_thought_they_were_getting_a_doctor-2014-04
- http://rollingout.com/tv/erica-tazel-justified-learning-hard-hollywood-lessons/
- http://www.starpulse.com/news/Brittany_Frederick/2012/02/07/qa_justifieds_erica_tazel_a_star_on_a
--Kmhkmh (talk) 03:15, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
The date of birth is pretty obviously wrong, and not substantiated in the referenced TV Guide link. Her first TV role was as a dance instructor on Sex in the City in 2001, which if she was born in 1990 would have been when she was 11. I found another site that claims she was born on March 31, 1976, which seems more reasonable: [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.172.159.106 (talk) 17:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.
