Talk:Dream interpretation

NPOV issues

The article is in dire need of opposing views, namely that dreams cannot be meaningfully interpreted. As it stands, only views that support dream interpretation are mentioned.--Megaman en m (talk) 14:09, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pseudoscience?

Is it appropriate to include this article in the pseudoscience category? Yodabyte (talk) 12:35, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing in the article even seems to suggest that it's pseudoscience, so until that happens you shouldn't add that category.--Megaman en m (talk) 13:21, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: English Composition 2

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 January 2023 and 29 April 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Slepykong (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Leyla2023 (talk) 02:06, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Psycholgocal perspective

I noticed there was a lot of cultural and religious interpretations of dreams mentioned in this article but the psychological aspect wasn't covered as much as I thought it would be. Is Freud's theory of dreams the only one popular in psychology or do other psychologists have theories on dream as well? Rafk042 (talk) 08:15, 4 April 2023 (UTC) Rafk042 (talk) 08:15, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Human Cognition SP23

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 January 2023 and 15 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rafk042 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Jeo.xo (talk) 20:24, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Up to date

Is this article up to date with new research? Rafk042 (talk) 08:31, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Oneiromancy into Dream interpretation

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
To not merge, as the topics are distinct. Klbrain (talk) 12:45, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing in the Oneiromancy article about oneiromancy, if oneiromancy is understood as a form of divination, and divination is understood as a "standardized process or ritual". There are no processes or rituals in the article. Instead the Oneiromancy article is overwhelmingly about dream interpretation, with brief mentions of Oneirogens. Daask (talk) 20:54, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose unsurprisingly, the Oneiromancy and divination page have issues. However, while dream interpretation is part of the process for Oneiromancy the two topics are distinct. This merge suggestion is functionally the same as suggesting the smartphone article should be merged with the cpu article because one involves the other. - Darker Dreams (talk) 04:59, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.