This article was nominated for deletion on 12 May 2024. The result of the discussion was redirect.

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Animation: American / Pixar Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This redirect is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This redirect is supported by the Pixar work group (assessed as Mid-importance). Disney Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Fictional characters This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character Film: American This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Doc Hudson was the fastest car when it was 90's — Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.255.196.70 (talk) 18:29, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Doc Hudson is 55 years old in the movie. This should be added to the article (maybe). The reason he is 55 is because the movie takes place in 2006. Doc is a 1951 Hornet, which makes him, at most, 55. Because Doc was alive during 1951, that makes him 55 years old. But maybe I'm wrong, because that would make Sally, at most, 4 years old. Any comments?

Unless specifically stated in Disney/Pixar media, we will not be adding ages to these articles. Rhindle The Red 17:01, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We do have his age, if he's based on Herb Thomas - born on April 6, 1923 and lived to age 77 (in 2000). We also have Sally's age (she's Dawn Welch, owner of the Rock Café since 1993, born January 1969 - which makes her 23 or 24 when she bought the place). The one catch is that, in the real world, driver and vehicle are two separate entities and have two separate dates of birth or manufacture... unlike Cars where both are integrated as one entity. Pixar's tendancy to combine multiiple NASCAR, US66 or automotive entities into one Cars character also complicates this... if there were three Fabulous Hudson Hornets with three drivers and pit crews, there are three different ages for drivers even if the vehicles are closely matched.

As such, his age must be worded as "a 1951 Hudson Hornet" who is "based heavily on Herb Thomas (1923-2000) and two others". 66.102.83.61 (talk) 16:37, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Doc Hudson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121025030434/http://www.wbrz.com/news/hudson-hornet to http://www.wbrz.com/news/hudson-hornet
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121028031336/http://www.clintondailynews.com/cgi-bin/newspost/extras/search.cgi?category=2&keyword=Pixar%27s+research+visit+to+Clinton+recalled to http://www.clintondailynews.com/cgi-bin/newspost/extras/search.cgi?category=2&keyword=Pixar%27s+research+visit+to+Clinton+recalled
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130204224410/http://nascar.speedtv.com/article/nhof-herb-thomas-heads-2013-hall-class to http://nascar.speedtv.com/article/nhof-herb-thomas-heads-2013-hall-class/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:46, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]