Talk:DeepSeek

Hallucinations

I would like to see a small section on accuracy and completeness of answers to queries. I tried this AI out and got some really bad answers along with some that seem good. Can someone find a source that tells about this? Kdammers (talk) 00:22, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear

 "for US million compared to  million for OpenAI's" - It looks like something is missing here.Kdammers (talk) 02:32, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like all the dollar amounts were removed in this edit for some reason, even ones in citation titles. I just put them all back. Jamedeus (talk) 18:57, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lede heavily focused on early 2025 media frenzy

The lede contains factual information regarding company claims, market shock, and media referring to it as a "Sputnik moment." However, it reads as a snapshot of the panic/frenzy in early 2025 following the release of DeepSeek-R1.

It is heavily reliant on sensational articles from the time and company claims, including treating "the company also trained its models during ongoing trade restrictions on AI chip exports to China, using weaker AI chips intended for export and employing fewer units overall" as undisputed fact despite there being questions/controversy regarding that.

Instead of reading like a summary of the DeepSeek company, it focuses on the most optimistic claims of the R1 model, its costs, the chips used, etc. and the most doomsday-ish implications for NVIDIA and western AI models that were floating around in early 2025. While the reactions to R1's release its implications are very important to include, I think it is given undue weight and does not give an accurate overview of the company/the current situation after the media frenzy wore off. Bpcon98 (talk) 01:08, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.