This page was proposed for deletion by Moriwen (talk · contribs) on 7 September 2024.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography Women scientists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Canada Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women Higher education This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education

I am struggling to connect the bibliography citations and resources I have added/created to the sandbox that I am drafting in. Is there a way I should do this or should I start doing the citations and resources in the sandbox? Crc612 (talk) 03:33, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Moriwen, I agree there's a weak case for WP:NACADEMIC but I think there is a case for WP:SNG. There are WP:RS in the article from WBUR-FM and The Relevator, which provides news reporting for Center for Biological Diversity. I also added one from Arizona Daily Star which I found via newspapers.com. If you feel strongly about this I recommend WP:AFD rather than WP:PROD as I don't see this as an obvious case for deletion. Thoughts? Nnev66 (talk) 12:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems legit to me. Thanks for the sourcing!— Moriwen (talk) 16:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response! Her lab reference is a primary source as was used more than it needed to be as there are other secondary sources that cover much of the content discussed in the article. So I can see why it was tagged that the article relied too much on primary sources. Note I found another in the Daily Hampshire Gazette which I just added that discusses her work studying transition from hemlock to black birch and implications for carbon emission. If you read the article again and feel it doesn't meet WP:BIO I think the best thing to do is WP:AFD. I removed the primary sources tag because there are now six secondary sources, and removed the notability tag about not meeting WP:NACADEMIC because I believe notability is GNG or SNG for an Indigenous woman scientist who is studying and measuring impacts of ecosystem changes on climate change which has been covered in multiple WP:RS. I'll remove the PROD tag tomorrow if no one else does by then. Nnev66 (talk) 21:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree about AfD, a PROD is too hasty. Ldm1954 (talk) 01:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]