This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Health and fitness This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is a horrible mixture of pseudo-science, poorly written tutorials and presumably copy/pasted advice. I've removed some of the worst offenders, but I feel like the entire article needs a major overhaul. Would be nice if it didn't read like a self-help book. Nimlhûg (talk) 20:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References are good, but in-line citations are better. It'd be nice to have citation tags on bits of information, as is I feel like adding {{fact}} tags to a couple sentences. WLU 17:05, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since it's not effective (according to it's article)? But what about (Chinese) pole dancing? comp.arch (talk) 15:25, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editors of this article might like to take a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Core muscle training (2nd nomination) where a possible merge or at least redirect has been suggested. Siuenti (talk) 22:01, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A similar page entitled Core Strengthening is in the midst of being published to Wiki as a college project. The table of contents for this page was used as a stepping stone for this and includes new topics to be discussed. Your suggestions and edits are welcome! Marilyn Narloch (talk) 02:43, 14 November 2016 (UTC)Marilyn Narloch[reply]

Hi, I think it would be a good idea to change the title to 'Core strength' on the basis that stability is only one aspect of strength. There is also core flexibility, for example, which could be a sub-section. Overall, I think this would give greater scope for the page to expand and would garner more interest among wikipedians. I believe core strength is also a more commonly used term than core stability in general. The 'Core stability' page would be redirected to 'Core strength'. Any fors or againsts?RickyBennison (talk) 10:29, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]