This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Statistics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

This article was proposed for deletion by JA(000)Davidson (talk · contribs) on 24 May 2011 with the comment: A total disaster which confuses hypothesis testing with classification.

Removed the box because:

1- this article does not deal anymore with hypothesis testing. It makes no sense the proposed reason for removal ("A total disaster which confuses hypothesis testing with classification")

2- Even if it did, any hypothesis testing procedure is a binary classification for the hypothesis under evaluation, and it is accepted to treat them together in other articles like Binary classification

Therefore please specify clearly your reasons for the removal proposal.

--Juansempere (talk) 10:41, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And I have restored it yet again. Do read the standard Wikipedia intro stuff. The standard for discussion pages is to retain everything except illegal or derogatory content so that everyone can see previous discussion. The presence of this tag has various consequences should someome want to PROD the article again. The presence of the tag on this page does not mean that the article is still being proposed for deletion, just that it was proposed for deletion and someone took action to prevent that. JA(000)Davidson (talk) 09:00, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Sorry.

--Juansempere (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.126.240.2 (talk) 13:32, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"False positives" section is using the same picture as the "True positives" section (same formula even with the same result). Thank you in advance for updating the picture with the correct version or additionally clarifying why the picture was reused!