This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: Keep, 23 October 2020, see discussion. keep, April 26, 2007, see discussion.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chess Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChessWikipedia:WikiProject ChessTemplate:WikiProject Chesschess Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Websites: Computing Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

I don't know how "notable" it is but, as a chess enthusiast, I can tell you that ChessCafe is highly regarded by the chess community.

I removed the prod tag because I think this site is one of the most well-known chess publishing sites on the internet. It is therefore of comparible notability to a well-known journal. The authors who provide content to chesscafe include the likes of Yasser Seirawan, Susan Polgar, and the well known arbiter Geurt Gijssen (who was arbitrator in the Kramnik-Topalov world championship match last year). With so many big names on the site, and with books based on the site receiving independent reviews, for example here, I think this page is justified. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:42, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Humbly, I completely agree the Prod to be removed. The chesscafe is highly praised by chess anateurs like myself for the reasons stated above. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.30.32.219 (talk) 02:45, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ChessCafe.com. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070706171003/http://www.susanpolgar.com:80/chess-cafe-articles.html to http://www.susanpolgar.com/chess-cafe-articles.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:36, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]