Talk:Castle Point

Requested move 7 December 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. There's a consensus for only the first two requests to be moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vestrian24Bio 13:07, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

– No clear primary topic, the district has 510 views but the constituency has 577, the Missouri one has 87, the New York has 61, the New Jersey one has 4, the Shopping Centre has 170 and the Anime Convention has 70. I'm less sure about the move of 1 word but given the settlement was at "Castle Point" on Commons until I moved it suggests they are interchangable. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:23, 7 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Vestrian24Bio 13:27, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose move of Castlepoint to Castlepoint, New Zealand. The settlement in New Zealand is called Castlepoint, not Castle Point (see entry in the LINZ Gazetteer here). The nearby cape is called Castle Point, but the article is ostensibly about the settlement, not the headland. There is no other article titled 'Castlepoint', and so there is no need to disambiguate Castlepoint as Castlepoint, New Zealand; however, this may change if and when an article for Castlepoint in Cork is created. Paora (talk) 09:32, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose move of Castlepoint to Castlepoint, New Zealand as per WP:SMALLDETAILS. Schwede66 02:49, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support first two. Pageviews seem to confirm that there is no clear WP:primary topic, especially between the borough and constituency. Oppose third for reasons stated in above two comments. Station1 (talk) 09:55, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisting comment: Are other users okay with the first two moves? Vestrian24Bio 13:27, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have no opposition to it. Traumnovelle (talk) 20:19, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Vestrian24Bio: It seems quite clear to me people have only opposed to the last move and Station1 has specifically supported the 1st 2 so I think consensus is clear. Crouch, Swale (talk) 22:38, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Okay then. Vestrian24Bio 13:01, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.