Talk:Canonical example
Why Do We Need This Article?
Yesterday I tried to find an article on canonical examples in Wikipedia, but I couldn't. I think we need this article, because many other Wikipedia articles talk of "canonical examples", but you have to guess what a canonical example is from context. So we need a definition. But we don't just need a definition: that would make it just Wiktionary's problem (I couldn't even find a definition at www.dictionary.com). It would also be useful to have some idea of how the use canonical examples has migrated from mathematics (where I suspect it started) to other fields, and some discussion of how canonical examples are used in philosophy. And of course it would be useful to discuss what makes a canonical example "canonical". It seems to me that there is a clear link between the ideas of "canonical example" and "ostensive definition" (which already has a Wikipedia article), but the two things aren't the same.
To be honest I haven't been able to even work out how to describe a canonical example clearly (and it's not like we can say "the canonical example of a canonical example is..."!), and I haven't seen any nice direct references, so what I've done is just started this article, and, rather like planting a seed, I'm hoping that the sun and rain of other editors will help it grow.
I realise that there may be a temptation to immediately delete this article because it's scanty and poorly referenced. I hope that at least some people who read this will feel that we do need to cover this topic, and be able to help turn it into a valuable article.
Thank you in advance. RomanSpa (talk) 22:45, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.