This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC This article was accepted on 1 June 2014 by reviewer Timtrent (talk · contribs). California Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of crime and criminal biography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. Dylanexpert (talk · contribs) has been paid by California Innocence Project on their behalf. Their editing has included contributions to this article.

Another success: http://californiainnocenceproject.org/read-their-stories/michael-hanline/ I don't know how this should be incorporated if the rest of the "12" aren't free yet. HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 17:31, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit. This is probably obvious, but the level of detail is almost farcical. These sections rely far too much on WP:PRIMARY sources, such as listings and press release (and Facebook posts!) from CIP. There is also a redundancy problem, as some of these incidents have their own articles.

I also think it's very likely that this article, and the biographies of several people associated with this group, have been edited for pay without disclosure, which is a violation of Wikipedia's terms of service (WP:PAID). That issue is discussed at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#QuisLex (perm).

Since these details were adding by the same editor, these issues are closely related. The way to resolve this is for an impartial editor to review these sources and trim excess details, or details which are poorly sourced. Grayfell (talk) 06:34, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if it's relevant to this item, but I see that several of the cases took 10 years plus before an exoneration took place. Should there be a mention that Prop 66 was passed and therefore sets a maximum time limit of ten years from time of sentencing, after which there can be no more appeals.2A02:8084:26E0:AA00:11CC:F70B:115A:2012 (talk) 13:47, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The link to the Daniel Larsen case no longer exists in the article about Kamala Harris. It appears to have been removed some time in 2019. the reference is effectively a dead link and no other relevant article appears to exist. According to WP:CRIMINAL, people wrongly convicted of a crime can be the subject of an article, consistent with WP:BLP1E. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 09:32, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]