The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Consensus to move to CJEU (AM), therefore, moved to CJEU (AM). (closed by non-admin page mover) Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 20:42, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CJEU → CJEU-AM – The Court of Justice of the European Union looks much more significant to the point that it can be considered the primary topic even for its acronym, which should become a redirect to it. Of course, there could be a better alternative title for the radio station. Dissident (Talk) 20:35, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Support move to CJEU (AM): Per naming conventions, articles on North American broadcast stations are titled at the official call sign, and when there is no suffix in the call sign — and there is no "-AM" suffix for any Canadian AM radio station — the type of service is placed in parentheses — i.e., "(AM)". "CJEU-AM" thus would not be a correct title, whereas "CJEU (AM)" would. All that said, the nominator's reasoning is sound to me — when one usage of "CJEU" is the acronym for a multinational court of justice that has been around in one form or another for many years (though has only had that name since 2009), and the other is a small, 1,000-watt Canadian radio station that has only been on the air since 2010, it definitely seems clear what the likely primary topic is, and it's not the radio station. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:50, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Support move to CJEU (AM): Per Wcquidditch. Neutralhomer • Talk • 13:31 on September 24, 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.