This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Electronics Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

For Bi-Wiring need special amplifier with 2-power outs per chanell!!! Amplifier with 8 connectors on 2 chanell!!

I think the article is fine, but it does need an explanation from those who propose bi-wiring is a good idea. Presently, there is only the viewpoint that bi-wiring is a marketing scheme with no technical benefit. Greenshinobi (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:11, 2 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Here is an article which shows theoretical electrical differences between single and bi-wiring setups. To summarize, the difference depends on the properties of the connecting cable; the more resistance in the cabling, the greater the effect of bi-wiring. The effect is a very small gain at the crossover frequency as compared to singel-wiring. The article does not make a claim as to whether this effect is audible or not. I'm not sure if this qualifies to be included as a 1st source in the main article, but it certainly presents the facts in a thoughtful manner: http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~jcgl/Scots_Guide/audio/biwire/Page1.html

24.18.249.94 (talk) 23:53, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About "Neutrality". On the good side, there is a value to reporting how people feel about a subject even if their beliefs are not proven. It's important on subject matters in social science and psychology. However, on a subject that is provable by science, it's reasonable for a reader to expect that an encyclopedia article sticks to the science for that subject. When two opposing perspectives of a subject are presented, where one group says 2+2=4 and the other group says 2+2=5, is that really "neutrality" ? Among mainstream scientists and engineers, the benefits of bi-wiring is an extraordinary claim, which should require extraordinary evidence. If such evidence is lacking in the article, that amounts to Wikipedia disseminating pseudoscience. Ohgddfp (talk) 03:12, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]