Talk:BEA Systems

Appraisal

how do you appraise your employees? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.69.173.247 (talkcontribs) 06:54, 25 January 2005

By raising their wage! :-) Wouter Lievens 20:01, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dodgy trivia

Isn't the item in trivia section a bit suspect? Says BEA was first to $1bn in revs but source is BEA corporate comms dept.Saganaki- 06:38, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above pages do not seem notable enough to have separate pages. Saligron 15:53, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well I guess it all depends on how exhaustive you want to be. If you are interested in JVM implementations then going ot a company page like Apple or IBM is a big waste of time. At least when I click on the links here I end up being on an overview page that I don't have time to interest to navigate.
Besides I think there is a great deal of expertise out there on the JVM and I'd love to see more of that reflected here.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Kris Tuttle (talkcontribs) 16:46, 5 February 2007

BEA to be bought by Oracle?

New at Oct 12th, 2007:

Announcement —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.32.3.83 (talk) 12:01, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Coleman didn't die in 1981

The link to Bill Coleman goes to the jazz musician; not to the Bill Coleman that cofounded BEA. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Klynninc (talkcontribs) 11:36, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mentioning OpenJPA

I think the OpenJPA project could be mentioned with the Kodo, what do you think? Touko vk (talk) 11:05, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.