The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: the page has been moved to Autodesk Revit as agreed below. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:38, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Autodesk Revit Architecture → RevitRevit – for duncan.lithgow - 110.232.42.149 (talk) 14:35, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• • There is no such thing as Revit Building, what are you refering to? There is Revit software platform which is available in three 'flavours': Revit Architecture, Revit Structure and Revit MEP. These products have been / are (I'm not quite sure at the moment) available separately. Now in 2013 you can also buy Revit All-in-one / One Box which includes the functionality of all platforms in one application. That's a good example of how the difference between these platforms are not extensive. I'm sorry if I'm ignorant of the procedures for moving a page, what are you referring to with {{subst:requested move|Revit}}? Did I use the wrong tag (did I even use a tag?) Is there something wrong with the way I'm proposing this change? Thanks for adding the tag to this conversation, are there more formalities we should observe? --duncan.lithgow (talk) 15:13, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Revit Building 9 --110.232.42.149 (talk) 16:44, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • Thanks for that link, but if you look at the build numbers and PDFs you'll see that you're looking at a product from 2006. Why Autodesk is so lazy with cleaning up their website is a mystery, I've often had similar problems trying to find out what the current version of something is... Here are two links to the history of Revit http://bimboom.blogspot.dk/2007/02/revit-history_11.html http://forums.augi.com/showthread.php?20803-Revit-Timeline-%28W-I-P-%29 You can see how the products fit together in 2012/2013 here: http://usa.autodesk.com/revit/how-to-buy/ --duncan.lithgow (talk) 21:28, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Do you mean Revit Building is a former name of Revit Architecture? Or it's a tool in Revit Architecture? Then it should be mentioned in the article. --222.35.187.25 (talk) 13:32, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • it was renamed. I've added that info to the history section (which needs a cleanup) --duncan.lithgow (talk) 09:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you still consider this as a controversial or potentially controversial move? --duncan.lithgow (talk) 21:28, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I wonder whether we should have 3 different article, one of whom named Autodesk Revit Architecture, or we should place all content in one article named Revit Series. --222.35.187.25 (talk) 13:32, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • As Ive said before the differences between RAC,RST and RMEP are so few compared to what they have in common that I think they should remain in one article unless some people knowledgable of the difference and willing to write them up begins to contribute. I hope to add something about the differences in the future but I've found it tricky because the function are always changing. So I say one article called simply Autodesk Revit, with some clarification of differences. --duncan.lithgow (talk) 09:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thank you! I agree with the move. --110.232.42.149 (talk) 03:36, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • Great. I won't make this move until I have time to adjust the text appropriately and add section for the three flavours. --duncan.lithgow (talk) 05:45, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.