This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ancient Egypt High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list: edit history watch purge Needed articles. We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have. Cleanup. To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates? Standardize the Chronology. A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563) Stub sorting Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . . Data sorting. This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.

Pugs, elephants, hermit crabs, and ligers were definitely not mummified by the Egyptians. Therefore, I am editing it. --76.126.102.42 (talk) 01:22, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Animal mummy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090107021735/http://www.animalmummies.com./project.html to http://www.animalmummies.com/project.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:17, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The presence of an end-of-sentence asterisk, which I have just removed, and wording in that section suggested to me that text in this article might have been copied, from a source that used an asterisk as a footnote symbol. However, searching found only this academia.edu article. That's extremely close to this article, and the first version of this article (in 2008) had the misspelling "immorality" for "immortality" that jumped off the page at me; however, the academia.edu article also misspells "Apis" "Abis", and that and other features were not present in this article when the Apis section was first added; and the academia.edu article only shows up in the Wayback Machine in 2017. So it is quite possible it has copied slabs of text from the Wikipedia article without attribution. However, it is also possible there is a common source, so I will leave this here to note the possibility. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:31, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/antiquity/article/abs/inka-llama-offerings-from-tambo-viejo-acari-valley-peru/877DCB73D4D804EFA2574443188A79C1

©Geni (talk) 02:51, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article states that killing an animal was punishable by death, but then goes on to describe animals being killed for victual mummies and religious offerings. This seems contradictory, or at least needs more explanation. OllyV (talk) 06:33, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]