Talk:American Alpine Club

Proposed merge with The Access Fund

Merge to parent organization -- no separate notability. DGG ( talk ) 14:39, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure I agree. While affiliated they seem to operate autonomously, work on different projects, and pursue slightly different advocacy. Ryanx7 (talk) 22:39, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely don't think they should be merged. I support/belong to both organizations. They have separate membership, have their headquarters in different towns, have separate leadership, and different goals. The Access Fund was once a part of the AAC but they are now separate. You wouldn't put England and the USA in the same article just because the one was once a part of the other. -- Luke S. Sept 15 2014 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lukeclimber (talk • contribs) 02:47, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Separate for sure. Perhaps a link to each other in respective pages, given their shared history, but the two are totally separate. Daxueshan (talk) 23:28, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pages should remain separate. These are two distinct entities. I am a member of both, and a volunteer chair for the AAC. TheJohnRichardson (talk) 23:33, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on American Alpine Club. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:24, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.