This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Physics: Acoustics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Acoustics Taskforce.

This page was advertising for some acoustic camera vendor (please see the references on the old page, and the number of links made to some vendor page). I tried to clarify the concept of acoustic camera as well as to introduce reference papers of the domain.

To my mind, the 2D/3D section should be removed because it is misleading (not really 3D localization of sound source, but more reprojection on a 3D model is described) and maybe untrue. I put it in a subsection called reprojection, but I see it as non-essential.

Application part was a sale pitch -> removed some commercial sentences (such as the fact that a non expert can do a lot of thing with an acoustic camera in quality) and added some references to scientific papers

References were made to a FPGA implementation of acoustic imaging, but this is of minor importance to my mind (I let it at the end though).

I regrouped some vendor links at the bottom of the page in alphabetical order.

I will try to add some content in challenge

Florian733r (talk) 06:20, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to reword some of the lead section to be more correct and make more sense. However, I am not sure if I did so correctly or if my changes removed or altered important meanings. More generally, the lead section likely requires a little attention from someone more knowledgeable about the subject. a CLoG? | unCLoG 20:25, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]