Talk:24 Heures

Untitled

If both Canadian papers are discussed on the same Wikipedia article, then why split out the information like this on the dab page? Does this help people find the article better? I don't think so. If so, please explain. Tedernst | talk 23:24, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As there are two editions for different cities, I think one should be able to read that on this page in one way or the other. BTW another paper to add: 24 heures -- User:Docu
Go ahead and add the other one. As for our issue here, disambiguation pages are not for information. They are to help the reader find the correct article as quickly as possible. All relevant information should be on the target pages, not on the dab page. So my question remains, does spliting them out into two seperate papers help the reader find the relevant article quicker? Tedernst | talk 23:55, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure if I prefer my initial version or the second version. Which one do you prefer? BTW Please help expanding the page as well. I'm sure there are some other titles that could be added. -- User:Docu

Speedy Delete

The 24 hours page covers this topic. Since 24 heures is not english it shouldn't be a seperate article on en.wikipedia.org-- SusanLarson (User Talk, New talk, Contribs) 11:29, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

24 heures already has an article in English wikipedia, but 24 heures still needs one. -- User:Docu

Restoring my speedy. the page you linked to needing a new page is non-english. This is the english wikipedia. The sites you mention would possibly warrant a page on fr.wikipedia.com but not en.wikipedia.com as an english person could not receive any benefit by visiting them. Reviewing the other pages listed here for possible deletion as well. Thanks for making them easy to find :) -- SusanLarson (User Talk, New talk, Contribs) 01:09, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's a paper, not a website. I understand that you are not interested, but possibly (b|B)ritish persons are interested. -- User:Docu

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.