Synchronous lateral excitation

When a pedestrian walks in sync with a ground oscillation, the lateral foot forces exacerbate already existing oscillations, leading to a positive feedback loop known as synchronous lateral excitation. Adapted from Figure 5-15 of Butz, C., et al. "Advanced load models for synchronous pedestrian excitation and optimized design guidelines for steel footbridges (SYNPEX)." RFCS-Research Project RFS-CR-03019 (2007).[1]

Synchronous lateral excitation is a dynamic phenomenon where pedestrians walking on a footbridge subconsciously synchronize their lateral footsteps with the bridge's natural swaying motion, amplifying lateral vibrations.[2][3] First widely recognized during the 2000 opening of the London Millennium Bridge, synchronous lateral excitation has since become a critical consideration in the design of lightweight pedestrian structures.[4][5][6]

Mechanism

As the number of pedestrians on a footbridge increases (black line in steps), the lateral oscillations increase (gray area). After a critical number of pedestrians is reached (166 in this example), the bridge enters a stage of synchronous lateral excitation. Simplified graph based on page 37 of Parker, Matt. Humble Pi: A Comedy of Maths Errors. Penguin UK, 2019.[3]

Synchronous lateral excitation arises from two interrelated synchronization processes. The first is the pedestrian-structure synchronization, where slight lateral bridge movements (e.g., from wind or random pedestrian steps) prompt walkers to adjust their gait to match the bridge's oscillation frequency, increasing lateral forces.[7] The second is pedestrian-pedestrian synchronization, where individuals unconsciously align their stepping patterns, further reinforcing the resonant force.[8][9]

Key cases

  • The London Millennium Bridge experienced lateral vibrations up to 70 mm due to synchronous lateral excitation, requiring a £5M retrofit with dampers.[2][4]
  • The Auckland Harbour Bridge experienced a lateral frequency of 0.67 Hz during a 1975 demonstration.[10]
  • The Birmingham NEC Link bridge experienced a lateral frequency of 0.7 Hz.
  • The Toda Park Bridge in Japan is an early documented case (1990s) studied by Fujino et al., informing later synchronous lateral excitation models.[7]

Mitigation strategies

Some ways to avoid synchronous lateral excitation are the implementation of tuned mass dampers, which were used in the Millennium Bridge to increase damping from 0.5% to 20% critical.[4] Other strategies involve designing bridges with lateral frequencies outside the 0.5–1.1 Hz range as well as managing crows by limiting pedestrian density during events.[5]

References

  1. ^ "Advanced load models for synchronous pedestrian excitation and optimised design guidelines for steel footbridges". Publications Office of the European Union. 2007.
  2. ^ a b Josephson, Brian (14 June 2000). "Out of step on the bridge". The Guardian. Retrieved 22 March 2018.
  3. ^ a b Parker, Matt (2019). Humble Pi: A Comedy of Maths Errors. Penguin UK.
  4. ^ a b c "Stabilising the London Millennium Bridge". Ingenia. 2000-06-10. Retrieved 2025-04-21.
  5. ^ a b Venuti, Fiammetta; Bruno, Luca (2017). "Footbridge lateral vibrations induced by pedestrians" (PDF). Procedia Engineering. 199: 179–184. Retrieved 2025-04-21.
  6. ^ Strogatz, Steven et al. (2005). "Theoretical mechanics: Crowd synchrony on the Millennium Bridge", Nature, Vol. 438, pp. 43–44.
  7. ^ a b Venuti, Fiammetta; Bruno, Luca (2008). "The synchronous lateral excitation phenomenon: modelling framework and application" (PDF). Comptes Rendus Mécanique. 336 (1–2): 194–199. Retrieved 2025-04-21.
  8. ^ "Modelling of lateral forces generated by pedestrians walking across footbridges" (PDF). Journal of Sound and Vibration. 528: 116938. 2022. Retrieved 2025-04-21.
  9. ^ Julavitz, Robert. "Point of Collapse", Village Voice, 26 August 2003.
  10. ^ Dallard, P. et al. "The London Millennium Footbridge," Archived 27 September 2011 at the Wayback Machine Structural Engineer, 20 November 2001. 79:22, pp. 17–35.

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.