Small object argument

In mathematics, especially in category theory, Quillen’s small object argument, when applicable, constructs a factorization of a morphism in a functorial way. In practice, it can be used to show some class of morphisms constitutes a weak factorization system in the theory of model categories.

The argument was introduced by Quillen to construct a model structure on the category of (reasonable) topological spaces.[1] The original argument was later refined by Garner.[2]

Statement

Let be a category that has all small colimits. We say an object in it is compact with respect to an ordinal if commutes with an -filtered colimit. In practice, we fix and simply say an object is compact if it is so with respect to that fixed .

If is a class of morphisms, we write for the class of morphisms that satisfy the left lifting property with respect to . Similarly, we write for the right lifting property. Then

Theorem[3][4] Let be a class of morphisms in . If the source (domain) of each morphism in is compact, then each morphism in admits a functorial factorization where are in .

Example: presheaf

Here is a simple example of how the argument works in the case of the category of presheaves on some small category.[5]

Let denote the set of monomorphisms of the form , a quotient of a representable presheaf. Then can be shown to be equal to the class of monomorphisms. Then the small object argument says: each presheaf morphism can be factored as where is a monomorphism and in ; i.e., is a morphism having the right lifting property with respect to monomorphisms.

Proof

For now, see:[6] But roughly the construction is a sort of successive approximation.

See also

References

  1. ^ D. G. Quillen. Homotopical algebra. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, No. 43. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1967
  2. ^ Richard Garner, Understanding the small object argument, Applied Categorical Structures 17 3 247-285 (2009) [arXiv:0712.0724, doi:10.1007/s10485-008-9137-4]
  3. ^ Cisinski 2023, Proposition 2.1.9.
  4. ^ Riehl 2014, Theorem 12.2.2.
  5. ^ Cisinski 2023, Example 2.1.11. Second method
  6. ^ Riehl 2014, § 12.2. and § 12.5.
  • Mark Hovey, Model categories, volume 63 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, American Mathematical Society, (2007),
  • Emily Riehl, Categorical Homotopy Theory, Cambridge University Press (2014) [1]
  • Cisinski, Denis-Charles (2023). Higher Categories and Homotopical Algebra (PDF). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1108473200.

Further reading

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.