Modal adjective

Modal adjectives are adjectives, such as likely, probable and necessary, that express modality, i.e., possibility, necessity, or contingency.[1][2]

In English

Modal adjectives can express modality regarding a situation or a participant in that situation. With situations, some usual syntactic patterns include an extraposed subject,[3] such as the underlined elements in the following examples with the modal adjective in bold. Here the modal adjective is analyzed semantically as a sentential modal operator.[3]

  1. It's possible that some of them are broken.
  2. It's likely that they will come.
  3. It is necessary (for us) to make a choice.

For participants, however, the usual syntactic construction has the adjective phrase in attributive modifier function,[3] as in the following examples, where the modal adjective is again in bold and this time the participant is underlined.

  1. We've found a potential replacement.
  2. They need to file the necessary papers.
  3. We took the obligatory photo.

Other constructions are also possible. For example, contingency may be expressed as We've made an offer contingent on the sale of our house, which can be paraphrased as Our offer stands if and only if we sell our house.

In Japanese

In Japanese, possibility is often expressed with the adjectives 可能 (kanou 'possible') and 不可能 (fukanou 'impossible'), as in:

目標

Mokuhyou

を

o

実現

jitsugen

する

suru

こと

koto

は

wa

不可能

fukanou

です

desu

目標 を 実現 する こと は 不可能 です

Mokuhyou o jitsugen suru koto wa fukanou desu

'It's impossible to realize that goal'

Impossibility can also be expressed with the modal adjective 無理 (muri 'impossible') as in:

円

en

を

o

7

nana

で

de

等分

toubun

する

suru

こと

koto

は

wa

無理

muri

です

desu

円 を 7 で 等分 する こと は 無理 です

en o nana de toubun suru koto wa muri desu

'a circle cannot be divided into seven equal parts'

The modern Japanese particle べき (beki 'should') derives from the traditional modal adjective べし (beshi) but no longer inflects.[4]

See also

References

  1. ^ Matthews, Peter (2003). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. ^ Huddleston, Rodney; Pullum, Geoffrey K. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 117.
  3. ^ a b c Frana, Ilaria (2017-04-20). Modality in the nominal domain: The case of adnominal conditionals. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198718208.003.0004.
  4. ^ Tranter, Nicolas (2012). The Languages of Japan and Korea. Routledge. p. 293. ISBN 978-1-136-44658-0.
Stub icon

This semantics article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by adding missing information.


Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.