Hybrid choice model

Hybrid choice models (HCMs) are extensions of classical discrete-choice models that combine what analysts can observe—prices, incomes and travel times—with what they cannot measure directly, such as attitudes, perceptions and habits.[1] Unlike standard models, which recover preferences only from observed choices, an HCM links those choices to one or more latent variables—statistical constructs that represent psychological traits. Integrating such constructs into a random-utility framework improves both behavioural realism and predictive accuracy.[2][3]

Conceptual framework

A typical HCM contains three interconnected blocks. Structural equations describe how latent variables depend on socio-economic characteristics and on one another; measurement equationsrelate each latent variable to survey indicators, creating a statistical bridge between unobserved attitudes and their noisy proxies; and a conventional choice model links both latent and manifest variables to the probability that an individual selects a particular alternative.[4] Later work clarified identification conditions and introduced simulation-efficient estimators that scale to large data sets.[5]

Applications

Transportation. Hybrid models clarify how safety norms or environmental concern shape preferences for cars, public transport and new mobility technologies. A study of Austria's car market, for example, showed that a latent "green" attitude substantially increases the probability of choosing an electric vehicle, even after controlling for price and driving range.[6]

Marketing. In consumer research HCMs connect stated perceptions of quality or loyalty to revealed purchase data. An application to the chocolate-bar market found that latent loyalty toward manufacturer or private-label brands strongly mediates price sensitivity.[7]

Health economics. By incorporating latent risk and burden perceptions, HCMs improve forecasts of treatment uptake. For lower-back–pain therapies, adding a latent "fear-of-movement" construct increased model fit and changed welfare estimates for alternative interventions.[8]

Environmental policy. Analysts use HCMs to study pro-environmental behaviour. A grey-water reuse study found that latent concern about water scarcity was a stronger driver of adoption than installation cost alone.[9]

Strengths and challenges

Because HCMs embed attitudes directly in the utility function they can improve behavioural realism, run "what-if" simulations that target beliefs rather than prices, and reduce omitted-variable bias when latent factors correlate with observed attributes.[3] Critics caution that policy simulations must respect the psychological theory behind the latent variables; otherwise results may be hard to interpret.[10] Data requirements are demanding—surveys must collect attitudinal indicators for every respondent—and estimating many random parameters can be computationally expensive, although new algorithms mitigate that burden.[3]

References

  1. ^ Ben-Akiva, Moshe; McFadden, Daniel; Train, Kenneth; Walker, Joan; Bhat, Chandra; Bierlaire, Michel; Bolduc, Denis (2002). "Hybrid Choice Models: Progress and Challenges". Marketing Letters. 13 (3): 163–175. doi:10.1023/A:1020254301302. hdl:10533/173383.
  2. ^ Walker, Joan L.; Ben-Akiva, Moshe (2002). "Generalized random utility model". Mathematical Social Sciences. 43 (3): 303–343. doi:10.1016/S0165-4896(02)00023-9.
  3. ^ a b c Bhat, Chandra R.; Dubey, Subodh K. (2014). "A new estimation approach to integrate latent psychological constructs in choice modelling". Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 67: 68–85. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2014.04.011.
  4. ^ Abou-Zeid, Maya; Ben-Akiva, Moshe (2014). "Hybrid choice models". In Hess, Stephane; Daly, Andrew (eds.). Handbook of Choice Modelling. Edward Elgar. pp. 383–412. ISBN 978-1-78100-315-2.
  5. ^ Vij, Akshay; Walker, Joan L. (2014). "Hybrid choice models: the identification problem". In Hess, Stephane; Daly, Andrew (eds.). Handbook of Choice Modelling. Edward Elgar. pp. 519–564. ISBN 978-1-78100-315-2.
  6. ^ Bahamonde-Birke, Francisco J.; Hanappi, Tibor (2016). "The potential of electromobility in Austria: Evidence from hybrid choice models under the presence of unreported information". Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 83: 30–41. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.11.002.
  7. ^ Kiss, Marietta; Czine, Péter; Balogh, Péter; Szakály, Zoltán (2022). "The connection between manufacturer and private label brands and brand loyalty in chocolate bar buying decisions: A hybrid choice approach". Appetite. 177 106145. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2022.106145. PMID 35772641.
  8. ^ Kløjgaard, Mirja E.; Hess, Stephane (2014). "Understanding the formation and influence of attitudes in patients' treatment choices for lower back pain: Testing the benefits of a hybrid choice model approach". Social Science & Medicine. 114: 138–150. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.05.058.
  9. ^ Amaris, Gloria; Hess, Stephane; Gironás, Jorge; Ortúzar, Juan de Dios (2021). "Using hybrid choice models to capture the impact of attitudes on residential greywater reuse preferences". Resources, Conservation & Recycling. 164 105171. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105171.
  10. ^ Chorus, Caspar G.; Kroesen, Maarten (2014). "On the (im-)possibility of deriving transport policy implications from hybrid choice models". Transport Policy. 36: 217–222. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.09.001.
Stub icon

This Econometrics-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by adding missing information.

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.