FURPS
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
FURPS (Functionality, usability, reliability, performance, supportability) is a model for classifying software quality attributes (functional and non-functional requirements):
Model
- Functionality - capability (size and generality of feature set), reusability (compatibility, interoperability, portability), security (safety and exploitability)
- Usability (UX) - human factors, aesthetics, consistency, documentation, responsiveness
- Reliability - availability (failure frequency (robustness/durability/resilience), failure extent and time-length (recoverability/survivability)), predictability (stability), accuracy (frequency/severity of error)
- Performance - speed, efficiency, resource consumption (power, ram, cache, etc.), throughput, capacity, scalability
- Supportability (serviceability, maintainability, sustainability, repair speed) - testability, flexibility (modifiability, configurability, adaptability, extensibility, modularity), installability, localizability
The model, developed at Hewlett-Packard was first publicly elaborated by Grady and Caswell. FURPS+ is now widely used in the software industry. The + was later added to the model after various campaigns at HP to extend the acronym to emphasize various attributes, such as Design Requirements, Implementation Requirements, Interface Requirements and Physical Requirements.[1]
See also
References
- ^ "Capturing Architectural Requirements". www.ibm.com. 15 November 2005. Archived from the original on 12 November 2020. Retrieved 2025-10-09.
Further reading
- Watson, Mike (2006). Managing Smaller Projects: A Practical Approach. Multi-Media Publications Inc. pp. 117 ff. ISBN 978-1-895186-85-7.
- Kenett, Ron; Baker, Emanuel (1999). Software Process Quality: Management and Control. CRC Press. pp. 130 ff. ISBN 978-0-8247-1733-9.
- Nakajo, Takeshi; Sasabuchi, Katsuhiko; Akiyama, Tadashi (April 1989). "A Structured Approach to Software Defect Analysis" (PDF). Hewlett-Packard Journal. 40 (2). Palo Alto: Hewlett-Packard Co.: 50–56. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2023-03-13. Retrieved 2016-03-24.
- Fischer, William A. Jr.; Jost, James W. (April 1989). "Comparing structured and unstructured methodologies in firmware development" (PDF). Hewlett-Packard Journal. 40 (2). Palo Alto: Hewlett-Packard Co.: 80–85. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2023-03-13. Retrieved 2016-03-24.
- Grady, Robert; Caswell, Deborah (1987). Software Metrics: Establishing a Company-wide Program. Prentice Hall. pp. 159. ISBN 0-13-821844-7.
- Carter, Donald; Stilwell Baker, Barbara (1992). Concurrent Engineering, The Product Development Environment for the 1990s. Addision-Wesley. pp. 175. ISBN 0-201-56349-5.
External links
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.