Submission declined on 4 March 2026 by Robert McClenon (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. This draft has one or more category errors. Either this draft is in a category that is for articles, or this draft lists a category that is not defined. The category errors should be corrected before resubmitting this draft. This draft cannot be reviewed in detail until the category errors are corrected. A draft should not have category errors if it is composed entirely using the AFC Wizard, or if it is composed entirely by entering text and then submitting it. Category errors in drafts may occur if you copied and pasted material from an existing article that included category designations, or as a result of some other error in composing the draft. Please review the procedure that you were using to compose and submit this draft. If you do not know how to correct the category errors, you may ask for help at the Teahouse or the Help Desk. This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject. Not every business corporation is notable, and this draft does not establish corporate notability. You may ask for advice about corporate notability at the Teahouse. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Robert McClenon 3 months ago. Last edited by AnomieBOT 3 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

SiteScan is an American infrastructure technology company based in Kansas City, Missouri. The company develops artificial intelligence software designed to automate the analysis of sewer inspection video and other underground infrastructure data.

SiteScan’s technology focuses on analyzing closed-circuit television (CCTV) sewer inspection footage using image-recognition systems to identify potential infrastructure defects and assist engineers, utilities, and contractors in reviewing pipeline conditions.^[1]

SiteScan develops software tools designed to support wastewater infrastructure inspection and workforce training.

One of the company's core technologies uses artificial intelligence to analyze sewer inspection video and identify defects such as cracks, root intrusion, and structural damage within pipelines. The system is intended to assist utilities and contractors by reducing manual review time and improving inspection consistency.

The company also develops SiteScan LMS, a training platform designed for wastewater operators. The platform includes training modules and practice examinations intended to help operators prepare for professional wastewater certification exams.

Sewer inspection is commonly performed using closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras inserted into underground pipelines. The recorded footage is typically reviewed manually by trained operators who identify and classify defects according to industry standards such as those developed by the National Association of Sewer Service Companies (NASSCO).

Artificial intelligence tools have increasingly been developed to assist with the analysis of inspection footage, allowing utilities to process large volumes of video and prioritize infrastructure repairs more efficiently.

SiteScan has participated in several startup ecosystem programs and competitions in the Midwest.

The company placed third at Missouri Startup Weekend, a three-day startup competition hosted in Columbia, Missouri that brings together entrepreneurs, investors, and mentors to build and pitch new ventures.^[2]

SiteScan was also selected to participate in the Pure Pitch Rally startup competition in Kansas City.^[3]

During the event, SiteScan received awards of $16k and recognition from judges and audience participants.^[4]

The company has also participated in regional entrepreneurship programs including the GMS-Tech mentorship initiative for emerging startups.^[5]

In 2026, SiteScan was selected for the Digital Sandbox KC proof-of-concept funding program, which supports early-stage technology companies developing new commercial products with $20k grants. ^[1]

Additional coverage of the funding was reported by the Pure Pitch Rally organization.^[6]

SiteScan was also referenced in Redbud VC’s 2025 year-in-review summary of companies and startup activity across its network.^[7]

• https://sitescan.build
• https://www.linkedin.com/company/sitescan

Category:Technology companies Category:Infrastructure companies Category:American software companies Category:Companies based in Kansas City, Missouri