Submission declined on 11 December 2025 by Qcne (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove: promotional language: see Words to watch; personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader; informal language. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Qcne 5 months ago. Last edited by Qcne 5 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

• Comment: In accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, I disclose that I have been paid by my employer for my contributions to this article. FeatherQuill (talk) 11:49, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. Please discuss further on the talk page. See our advice if the article is about you and read our scam warning in case someone asks for money to edit this article. (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Sherlocks.ai is an artificial intelligence company headquartered in San Francisco, United States, founded in 2025 by Gaurav Toshniwal and Akshat Sandhaliya.^[1][2] The company is an AI-driven Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) platform that manages alerts, performs automated root cause analysis (RCA), and provides remediation recommendations for engineering and operations teams.^[3][4] Sherlocks.ai has appeared in broader industry discussions on AIOps and site reliability engineering, including mentions in publications such as Forbes and coverage in startup media like Inc42’s “AI Startups To Watch” feature, which described the platform as an “AI detective” for site reliability and DevOps teams.^[5]

Sherlocks.ai was founded in 2025 by Gaurav Toshniwal and Akshat Sandhaliya, who previously worked together at the Indian edtech platform Doubtnut.^[6][7][8] The idea for the company emerged from their experience managing large-scale infrastructure and incident load at Doubtnut, where they encountered challenges around alert volume and manual root cause investigation.^[9]

Sherlocks.ai provides an artificial intelligence platform designed to assist Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) and DevOps teams in managing operational incidents. The platform analyses alerts and telemetry data to identify probable root causes and automates parts of the incident investigation workflow.^[10][11]

According to publicly available reviews and product descriptions, the platform includes features such as alert correlation, automated investigation of logs and metrics, identification of potential failure points, and generation of suggested remediation steps.^[12] The platform integrates with commonly used observability systems, including Datadog, New Relic and Prometheus.^[13]

Media coverage has described Sherlocks.ai as an “AI detective” or “AI teammate” for engineering teams, highlighting its focus on triaging incidents and reducing manual investigative work.^[14]

Sherlocks.ai is SOC 2 Type II compliant, indicating that its internal controls for security and data handling have been independently audited.^[15]

Sherlocks.ai has been included in startup and technology media discussions related to artificial intelligence and site reliability engineering. It was featured in Inc42’s “AI Startups To Watch” list, where the platform was described as an “AI detective” for engineering and operations teams.^[16]

The company has also appeared in broader industry discussions on AIOps and infrastructure reliability, including articles published by technology and business outlets such as Forbes. These mentions relate to the wider AIOps market in which Sherlocks.ai operates rather than direct company-specific coverage.

Sherlocks.ai is included in several software and startup directories that provide product information, feature summaries and user reviews. These listings are maintained independently by the respective platforms.

• G2 profile
• Toolhunt listing
• SenseAI portfolio page