Thanks for reviewing the article. The draft has been revised to address the previous review comments. Inline citations have been added throughout the lead, career, and reception sections to ensure that all statements are clearly supported by reliable, independent sources. The awards section has also been streamlined and is now fully referenced.

Submission declined on 10 March 2026 by Pythoncoder (talk). This draft lacks inline citations. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. We require inline citations (footnotes) to show which source supports which specific statement. You must place an inline citation directly after: quotations; any material whose verifiability is likely to be challenged or is contentious; any material about living people. Please edit your draft to support your statements with inline citations. Learn how to create inline citations in the: Source Editor: Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup. VisualEditor: Introduction to referencing with VisualEditor. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Pythoncoder 2 months ago. Last edited by Finlogical 2 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 7 February 2026 by Gilgongo (talk). This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Gilgongo 3 months ago.

• Comment: Please fix the citations so they all use footnotes —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 23:02, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: I'm afraid this would likely be nominated for deletion as not yet meeting WP:BASIC and not likely to meet WP:CREATIVE either. gilgongo (talk) 09:03, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

The draft has been substantially revised to address notability concerns. Multiple independent, reliable secondary sources have been added, including long-form coverage and interviews from The Starfish, the Vancouver International Film Festival blog, and The Common Sense Canadian. These sources provide significant discussion of the subject’s work, approach to documentary filmmaking, and role in public discussions of environmental sustainability.

This is a draft article. It is a work in progress open to editing by anyone. Please ensure core content policies are met before publishing it as a live Wikipedia article. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs · Article logs · Draft logs. Last edited by Finlogical (talk | contribs) 2 months ago. (Update) Finished drafting? Submit for review or Publish now

Scott Renyard is a Canadian documentary filmmaker, writer, and producer whose work focuses on environmental, ecological, and social issues, particularly in relation to marine ecosystems and coastal communities on Canada’s west coast.^[1] His films include Who Killed Miracle? (2009), The Pristine Coast (2014), and The Herring People (2024), which examine issues such as wildlife captivity, industrial development, and resource use.^[2]

His work has been featured in independent media coverage and film festival programming, including the Vancouver International Film Festival, where he has discussed his approach to documentary filmmaking and environmental storytelling.^[3]

Renyard holds a Master of Science degree from the University of British Columbia. His academic work includes research in fisheries and environmental management. In 1986, he co-authored the peer-reviewed article “Sport angler preferences for alternative regulatory methods” with fisheries scientist Ray Hilborn, published in the Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences.^[4]

His scientific training and research background have informed his later work as a documentary filmmaker, particularly on projects addressing fisheries management, marine ecosystems, and environmental policy.^[5]

Renyard’s documentaries have contributed to public discussion on environmental sustainability and marine conservation in Canada.^[6] Coverage of The Pristine Coast emphasized its role in synthesizing scientific research, regulatory history, and personal testimony to examine the environmental effects of salmon farming.^[7] Media commentary has situated the film within broader debates about aquaculture practices and their long-term implications for wild salmon populations and coastal ecosystems.^[8]

Renyard is a Canadian documentary filmmaker whose work has focused on environmental science, sustainability, and marine ecosystems, particularly issues surrounding salmon farming and wild fish populations on the Pacific coast of Canada.^[9]

In connection with the documentary The Pristine Coast, Renyard has been the subject of independent media coverage discussing both his filmmaking approach and the environmental themes of his work. A feature interview in The Starfish examined Renyard’s motivations and creative process, highlighting his interest in presenting complex scientific and ecological issues through documentary storytelling and his focus on the long-term impacts of industrial activity on marine environments.^[10]

Renyard’s work has also been discussed in the context of public debate around salmon farming. Writing in The Common Sense Canadian, journalist Rafe Mair described The Pristine Coast as an in-depth examination of the history and environmental consequences of salmon aquaculture in British Columbia, situating the film within broader discussions of sustainability, regulation, and ecological risk.^[11]

In advance of the film’s screening at the Vancouver International Film Festival, Renyard participated in a festival blog interview in which he discussed his approach to documentary filmmaking, the challenges of communicating scientific uncertainty to general audiences, and the role of film festivals in fostering public engagement with environmental issues.^[12]

In 2009, Renyard wrote, directed, and produced Who Killed Miracle?, a documentary investigating the life and death of Miracle, a young female killer whale rescued near Campbell River, British Columbia, in 1977. After rehabilitation, Miracle became a popular attraction at Sealand of the Pacific in Victoria, before drowning in 1982 after becoming entangled in netting in her enclosure, as reported by contemporary news coverage.^[13] The film examines archival footage, interviews, and historical records to explore the circumstances surrounding her captivity and death.^[14]

Renyard directed The Pristine Coast, a feature-length documentary examining the environmental and political history of salmon aquaculture on Canada’s west coast. The film was selected as part of the Vancouver International Film Festival’s BC Spotlight program.^[15]

In 2024, Renyard directed and produced The Herring People, a feature-length documentary exploring the ecological and cultural importance of Pacific herring. The film examines the role of herring within marine ecosystems and coastal communities, incorporating scientific research, Indigenous knowledge, and conservation perspectives. The film screened internationally at environmental film festivals and received recognition from documentary award organizations.^[16]

• 2015 – FOCAL International Awards: Best Use of Wildlife and Natural History Footage – The Pristine Coast^[17]

• 2010 – Yorkton Film Festival: Golden Sheaf Award (Documentary Nature/Environment) – Who Killed Miracle?^[18]

• 2024 – Impact Docs Awards: Award of Excellence – The Herring People^[19]