Submission declined on 8 September 2025 by Thilsebatti (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Thilsebatti 8 months ago. Last edited by Eastmain3 4 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 17 August 2025 by Significa liberdade (talk). This draft is not written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove: promotional language: see Words to watch; personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader; informal language. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. Declined by Significa liberdade 9 months ago.

Repro Uncensored is a nonprofit organization founded in 2024 that documents and researches the online censorship of reproductive rights and sexual and reproductive health information. It works with reproductive health advocates, digital rights groups, and cultural collectives. The organization has been cited in international media, including the Associated Press, The Guardian, and France 24.^[1][2][3]

History

Repro Uncensored was founded in 2024 in response to reports of reproductive health and abortion content being restricted or removed from major social media platforms.^[4] The initiative was formed through collaborations between reproductive rights advocates, technologists, and artists.

Since its founding, the organization has worked with international reproductive health organizations and digital rights groups to collect data on content restrictions and to raise concerns about transparency in platform governance.^[5]

Programs and Activities

Report an Incident Tool

Repro Uncensored operates the Report an Incident tool, which collects submissions from individuals and organizations reporting content removals, shadowbanning, and account restrictions related to reproductive rights and health.^[6]

Research and Publications

The organization produces research on algorithmic suppression of sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) information. Studies have documented AI-generated content suppression, regional censorship in countries such as Iran, Iraq, Thailand, and Mexico, and platform moderation patterns.^[7][8]

Toolkits and Resources

Repro Uncensored has produced toolkits on abortion censorship and digital security, intended to provide practical guidance for advocates and organizations on identifying and responding to online suppression.^[9]

Impact and Events

Repro Uncensored's work has been cited by human rights organizations and has been presented in international conferences and cultural gatherings. The organization collaborates with partners including Amnesty International, Fight for the Future, SisterSong, and the Digital Defense Fund.^[10][11][12]

The organization has contributed to panels and side events at the Global Gathering in Estoril, Portugal, the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) in New York, and the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA).^[13][14]

It has also been active in cultural programming, including South by Southwest (SXSW),^[15] Art Basel Miami, RightsCon,^[16][17] the Kimpa Vita Pan-African Festival in Senegal, and International Safe Abortion Day in Brussels.^[18]