Submission declined on 27 December 2025 by TheTechie (talk). This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove: promotional language: see Words to watch; personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader; informal language. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use. This draft is not written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove: promotional language: see Words to watch; personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader; informal language. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by TheTechie 5 months ago. Last edited by TheTechie 5 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 9 December 2025 by MediaKyle (talk). This draft is not written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove: promotional language: see Words to watch; personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader; informal language. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. Declined by MediaKyle 5 months ago.

Submission declined on 25 September 2025 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by DoubleGrazing 8 months ago.

• Comment: Primary sources do not establish notability, per WP:GNG. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:12, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

LifeWatch ERIC is a distributed European research infrastructure designed to support biodiversity and ecosystem research through digital services, virtual research environments and interoperable data resources.^[1]

The concept of LifeWatch was first included in the European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (ESFRI) Roadmap in 2006.^[2] A preparatory phase was carried out between 2008 and 2010, followed by a transition period until 2017. LifeWatch was formally established as a European Research Infrastructure Consortium (ERIC) on 17 March 2017 under EU law.^[3]

The Statutory Seat and ICT technical offices are located in Seville, Spain.^[4]

LifeWatch ERIC operates through several Common Facilities:

• Spain – Statutory Seat and ICT Core
• Italy – Service Centre
• The Netherlands – Virtual Laboratories & Innovations Centre (VLIC)^[5]

Member States contribute through national nodes known as “Distributed Centres”. As of 2024, the Member States include Belgium, Bulgaria, Greece, Italy, The Netherlands, Portugal, Slovenia and Spain.^[6]

LifeWatch ERIC provides digital tools and data-access services to support biodiversity and ecosystem research. Its activities include:

• Access to biodiversity and ecosystem data, services and workflows.^[7]
• Virtual Research Environments (VREs) for data processing, modelling and visualisation.^[8]
• Support for the application of the FAIR data principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable).^[9]

LifeWatch ERIC was created under the legal framework for European Research Infrastructure Consortia (ERIC), established by Council Regulation (EC) No. 723/2009.^[3] Funding derives primarily from Member State contributions, both financial and in-kind, and is supplemented by European and national research projects.^[10]

LifeWatch ERIC resources are used in biodiversity monitoring, ecosystem assessment and environmental research. The infrastructure supports studies addressing climate change, biodiversity loss, ecosystem services and sustainable resource management.^[11] It also provides tools and workflows for modelling and analysis using large-scale datasets and computational methods.^[12]

• Technical: integration of diverse environmental datasets, maintaining interoperability and FAIR compliance, and continued development of analytical tools.
• Financial: ensuring long-term sustainability of funding across Member States.
• Geographic: potential expansion to new Members and increased collaboration beyond the EU.
• Societal: broader engagement with sectors such as environmental management, policy, and citizen-oriented initiatives.^[5]

• European Research Infrastructure Consortium
• ESFRI
• Virtual research environment
• FAIR data principles