Submission declined on 15 October 2025 by Perryprog (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content. LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies: hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references. unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual. copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Perryprog 7 months ago. Last edited by Thucydidia 3 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 30 September 2025 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by DoubleGrazing 8 months ago.

• Comment: Of the two sources added since the last decline, one is a press release which does not meet the "independent" criteria listed above, and the other is an interview with the founder which would be a primary source and is also not independent. You will need to demonstrate that around three sources exist that meet the criteria listed in the first box above (starts with "This draft's references [...]). Perryprog (talk) 15:02, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

Lemon Learning is a European software-as-a-service (SaaS) company headquartered in Paris, France. The company was founded in 2014 and has continously developed its digital adoption platform. In the latest Digital Adoption Platforms PEAK Matrix Assessment by Everest Group 2025, Lemon Learning was listed among the “Major Contenders” in the vendor landscape.^[1]

Lemon Learning was founded by Pierre Leroux, a French entrepreneur. Leroux studied computer engineering and electronics, before graduating in business from HEC Paris.^[2] According to press interviews, the company has grown without external venture capital funding and has remained entirely self funded since its creation.^[3] In December 2015, Lemon Learning completed its first aquisition, acquiring Aidaxis to expand its coverage of desktop applications.

Lemon Learning’s platform is designed to support digital adoption by delivering contextual, in-application guidance within enterprise software environments.^[4] The platform is primarily used in onboarding, training, change management and digital transformation initiatives, with the aim of improving data quality, user efficiency and user autonomy.^[5]

• Official website