Submission declined on 16 January 2026 by CNMall41 (talk). This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers. Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute. Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed. This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content. LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies: hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references. unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual. copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by CNMall41 4 months ago. Last edited by Eastmain 4 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 13 October 2024 by Johannes Maximilian (talk). This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers. Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute. Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed. Declined by Johannes Maximilian 19 months ago.

Submission declined on 28 September 2024 by Qcne (talk). This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers. Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute. Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed. This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Qcne 20 months ago.

• Comment: Despite previous decline for sourcing, there is still a large amount of content not supported by reliable sources. There are also clear signs that the content was generated with the assistance of AI. CNMall41 (talk) 06:27, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: Please remove the external links and unsourced WP:BLP material from the draft's body. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 17:38, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: Wikipedia cannot reference itself. Theroadislong (talk) 20:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. Please discuss further on the talk page. See our advice if the article is about you and read our scam warning in case someone asks for money to edit this article. (March 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

^[1]

Kate Coyne (born Kate Louise Homes 7th March 1968 London, is an English dancer, Artistic Director and Movement Director. Currently Artistic Director and Professional Training Lead, Central School of Ballet.^[2] Her dancing career includes work with London Contemporary Dance Theatre, Rambert Dance Company, Michael Clark Company and DV8 Physical Theatre. Current chair of Dance Professional Fund^[3]

Coyne was a student at The Royal Ballet School (1984–1987) followed by a post graduate year at London Contemporary Dance School (1987–1988). She subsequently joined London Contemporary Dance Theatre working with choreographers Sir Robert Cohan, Mark Morris, Kim Brandstrup, Darshan Singh-Bhuller, Dan Wagoner, Aletta Collins, Amanda Miller and Christopher Bruce amongst others.

In 1994 Kate joined Rambert Dance Company working with Christopher Bruce, Mark Baldwin, Rafael Bonacela, Kim Brandstrup, Jiří Kylián, Martha Clarke, Ohad Naharin, Matthew Hawkins and Sara Matthews.

Turning freelance in 1997 she became a regular performer for a cohort of international choreographers including Michael Clark Company,^[4] DV8,^[5] Mark Baldwin Dance Company,^[6] Jeremy James and Dancers, Martha Clarke , Michael Keegan-Dolan and Arthur Pita.

The ballet-based moves are severe and slow, countering the sternum-punching blast of tracks by Wire, Public Image Ltd and the Sex Pistols. Technical precision is Clark's obsession, and it pays off handsomely in the control of fine dancers such as Kate Coyne

Mmm..., Barbican, London Up from the Waste, Soho Theatre, London The Sleeping Beauty, Royal Opera House, London | The Independent | The Independent

The most unsettling moment in Michael Clark's latest work is a solo in which dancer Kate Coyne is put into a costume that's covered in fake syringes.

Michael Clark Company | Dance | The Guardian

It is not re-energized by Doig's famous paintings, though another layer is added to the portrait's texture, but by his dancers, Kate Coyne

Theatre review: Swamp / Come, Been and Gone at Barbican

But the second half is another matter altogether - it has some extraordinarily strange stuff, the most stimulating and unpredictable mood-movement from Clark recently. The dancers reflect Clark's range of references: the ballet-dancers Oxana Panchenko and Kate Coyne,

Rambert Dance, Sadler's Wells/ Michael Clark Company, Barbican Theatre

Coyne has contributed to several books including in Dr Peter Brinson and Fiona Dicks fit to dance fit-to-dance-by-peter-brinson.pdf and The Last Guru, Sir Robert Cohan - Paul RW Jackson

Recent film credits

• Broken English^[7]
• The Extraordinary Miss Flowers

Coyne retired from the stage in 2012 and worked as Producer for Frieze Projects,.^[8] was appointed Programme Director, Siobhan Davies Dance 2013-2016,^[9] then Associate Director, Michael Clark company 2016-2021.^[10] Currently she is in post as Artistic Director and Professional Training Lead at Central School of Ballet in London^[2]

• In 2009 Critics Circle Award for Best Female Dancer (Modern)^[11]
• Joint winner of an Olivier Award for Outstanding Achievement in Dance with colleagues from London Contemporary Dance Theatre^[12]

• Chair, Dance Professionals Fund (Formerly Royal Ballet Benevolent Fund) 2014-Present^[13]
• Married with three grown-up children she lives in Brixton, London.