Submission declined on 27 April 2026 by Bonadea (talk). This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content. LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies: hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references. unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual. copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Bonadea 41 days ago. Last edited by Bonadea 41 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification. Please help by adding reliable sources. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libelous. Find sources: "Josh de Lange" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (January 2026) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Josh de Lange is a Dutch podcaster and media professional. He has been featured in Dutch media in connection with public discussions on sexual boundaries and consent, including interviews in Trouw and LINDA..^[1][2] He's the creator and host of the Over Seks(t) Podcast and appeared on NPO Radio 1 discussing a campaign about communicating sexual wishes and boundaries.^[3]

Rutgers profiled de Lange as a Social Change Agent, a programme supporting young role models who discuss taboo topics around sexuality in their communities and media. A group Josh at the time together with Rutgers set up and has grown into an academy for young people who want to make the world a better and safer place.^[4]

In a Rutgers profile, de Lange said he is from Eindhoven and lived in Tilburg while studying communication (within the creative industry) at a university of applied sciences.^[4]

Josh De Lange is the host of the podcast Over Seks(t), which focuses on sex education and related social topics.^[3][5]

De Lange has spoken publicly about sexual violence and boundaries, including interviews in LINDA. and Trouw.^[2][1]

In 2021, Omroep Tilburg reported that Tilburg student rugby club TSRC Tarantula worked with Captain Projects on a nude calendar initiative raising funds for Movember.^[6] The initiative received additional coverage from LINDA. and Omroep Brabant.^[7][8] In 2025, Univers (Tilburg University) wrote that the earlier calendar received attention in the NOS Journaal.^[9]

Lay3rs 3D Printing published a post describing de Lange as its Chief Commercial Officer (CCO) and crediting him with developing an internal approach to automating meeting minutes using AI.^[10]

• rutgers.nl/over-rutgers/steun-ons/samen-bereiken-we-meer/social-change-agents/josh-de-lange/ (Rutgers profile)