Draft:Jace Yarbrough
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 15 January 2026 by AlphaBetaGamma (talk). This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.
Declined by AlphaBetaGamma 4 months ago.LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. |
Submission declined on 14 January 2026 by Bobby Cohn (talk). This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.
This draft lacks inline citations. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. We require inline citations (footnotes) to show which source supports which specific statement.
Declined by Bobby Cohn 4 months ago.You must place an inline citation directly after:
Please edit your draft to support your statements with inline citations. Learn how to create inline citations in the:
|
Comment: Candidates for political office are rarely if ever notable enough to meet WP:NPOL. Bkissin (talk) 00:52, 21 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment: (Note: Ballotpedia did not identify any endorsements for his ongoing 2026 congressional campaign as of available records.[3] Some additional claimed endorsements, such as Texas Farm Bureau AGFUND, Patriot Mobile executives, American Principles Project, Texas Home School Coalition, State Reps. Brent Money/Keith Self/Nate Schatzline/Wes Virdell, appear in campaign materials or secondary mentions but lack independent confirmation in major news sources reviewed; they may require direct verification from official endorsement lists.)
AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 00:14, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
Jace Yarbrough | |
|---|---|
| Member-elect of the U.S. House of Representatives from Texas's 32nd district | |
| Assuming office January 3, 2027 | |
| Succeeding | Julie Johnson (redistricted) |
| Personal details | |
| Born | 1986 or 1987 (age 39–40) Stephenville, Texas, U.S. |
| Party | Republican |
| Education | University of Texas, Austin (BA) Stanford University (JD) |
| Website | Campaign website |
Jace Yarbrough (born 1986/1987)[1] is an American attorney and United States Air Force veteran. He was a candidate in the 2024 Republican primary for the Texas Senate in District 30, advancing to a runoff election which he lost to Brent Hagenbuch.[2][3]
He is a candidate in the Republican primary for Texas's 32nd congressional district in the 2026 election.[2]
2024 Texas Senate campaign
Yarbrough ran for the open seat in Texas Senate District 30 in 2024, which was vacated by retiring Senator Drew Springer. He received approximately 33% of the vote in the March Republican primary and advanced to a May runoff against Brent Hagenbuch, who won the nomination.[2][3][4]
During the campaign, Yarbrough received endorsements from several conservative organizations and individuals, including:
- Texas Right to Life[5]
- Grassroots America – We The People[6]
- True Texas Project[6]
- Former Texas GOP chair Lt. Col. Allen West[4][7]
- Former state representative Matt Schaefer[4][7]
References
- ^ https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/we-recommend/2026/02/12/we-recommend-in-the-republican-primary-for-32nd-congressional-district/
- ^ a b c "Jace Yarbrough". Ballotpedia. Retrieved January 15, 2026.
- ^ a b "Brent Hagenbuch defeats Jace Yarbrough in GOP Senate runoff for North Texas". Dallas Morning News. May 29, 2024. Retrieved January 15, 2026.
- ^ a b c "North Texas Senate runoff divides usual allies within GOP". Texas Tribune. April 24, 2024. Retrieved January 15, 2026.
- ^ "North Texas: Vote Jace Yarbrough!". Texas Right to Life PAC. May 8, 2024. Retrieved January 15, 2026.
- ^ a b "Runoff Preview: Yarbrough and Hagenbuch Face Off for Senate District 30". Texas Scorecard. May 7, 2024. Retrieved January 15, 2026.
- ^ a b "Texas Senate runoff zooms in on experience". NBC 5 Dallas–Fort Worth. May 16, 2024. Retrieved January 15, 2026.
External links
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.

- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.