Draft article not currently submitted for review. This is a draft Articles for creation (AfC) submission. It is not currently pending review. While there are no deadlines, abandoned drafts may be deleted after six months. To edit or make changes to this draft, simply click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. To be accepted, a draft should: Show the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article by using multiple sources that meet four criteria. The sources should be (1) reliable (2) secondary (3) independent of the subject (4) talk about the subject in some depth. For some topics, there are alternative criteria. Be written from a neutral point of view Respect copyright and do not plagiarize. Do not copy-paste. It is strongly discouraged to write about either yourself or your business or employer. If you do so, you must declare it. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Last edited by Germain Archipel (talk | contribs) 3 months ago. (Update) Submit the draft for review!

Freeda is a company specializing in the verification of construction plans and regulatory compliance analysis for real estate and building projects.

Registered in France under the legal status of a Société par Actions Simplifiée (SAS), Freeda operates in several markets, including Europe and the United States. The company focuses on early-stage project review prior to construction.

Freeda provides services related to design risk management, regulatory compliance verification, and technical plan analysis.

Freeda offers plan verification and compliance analysis services aimed at identifying errors, inconsistencies, and regulatory non-compliance in construction documentation before administrative submission or construction launch.

Freeda analyzes architectural and technical plans to assess compliance with applicable regulations, including:

• urban planning regulations and building permit requirements,
• fire safety regulations,
• accessibility standards for people with reduced mobility (PMR),
• other local or sector-specific regulatory frameworks.

The analysis is conducted directly on submitted plans, with annotated reports identifying compliant elements, non-compliant elements, and potential risks.

Freeda compares project plans with contractual and program documentation, such as:

• project programs,
• technical specifications,
• descriptive notes,
• tender documentation.

This process aims to verify that the plans accurately reflect the client’s requirements and contractual obligations.

Freeda may intervene during early project phases to assess technical, regulatory, and functional feasibility. These assessments support decision-making before significant investment or administrative submission.

Before the start of construction, Freeda can conduct plan audits to identify inconsistencies, unresolved compliance issues, or technical risks that may affect project execution.

Freeda uses a hybrid methodology combining automated plan analysis tools and expert review.

Clients submit project documentation through the company’s platform. The analysis process includes automated processing of plan data followed by validation by specialists. The company provides annotated reports highlighting compliance status and areas requiring correction.

Freeda’s services are typically used:

• prior to building permit submission,
• during design review phases,
• before the start of construction,
• in projects subject to complex regulatory frameworks,
• in large-scale or multi-site real estate developments.

Freeda primarily serves project owners and real estate stakeholders, including:

• real estate developers,
• asset owners,
• commercial, residential, and industrial developers.

Its services may also be used by design offices, engineering firms, and project management teams seeking structured compliance review support.

Freeda operates within the broader construction and real estate ecosystem, where regulatory frameworks are increasingly complex and project timelines are constrained.

The company positions itself as a third-party plan verification service focused on early-stage risk identification and regulatory compliance review.