Review waiting, please be patient. This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 4,423 pending submissions waiting for review. If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space. If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here. In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Reviewer tools Instructions · What links here · Benedict Ong (talk: + · bio) · (log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search: Google, Wikipedia) · Submitted 3 days ago by Smithandjosh (talk: D · +) · Last edited 3 days ago by Smithandjosh

This is a draft article. It is a work in progress open to editing by anyone. Please ensure core content policies are met before publishing it as a live Wikipedia article. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs · Article logs · Draft logs. Last edited by Smithandjosh (talk | contribs) 3 days ago. (Update) This draft has been submitted and is currently awaiting review.

Benedict Alvin Ong is a New Zealand local government politician in Dunedin, New Zealand. He is a councillor of the Dunedin City Council, in his first term. He has gained significant media attention following his censure by the council. The city council voted 10–2 on 26 March to request Ong resign, which he rejected.^[2][3] During the meeting, Ong chose to read from Franz Kafka's novel The Trial instead of defending himself.^[4][5]

Benedict Ong has claimed that he was born in Dunedin.^[6] He and his family subsequently moved to Australia where he received most of his schooling.^[6] Ong later studied finance at the University of New South Wales, graduating with a bachelor of commerce in 2004.^[6][7]

He worked as an associate director in Rabobank Singapore's mergers and acquisitions team between 2007 and 2010. Between May 2013 and December 2017, Ong was employed by the Royal Bank of Canada's (RBC) wealth management team in Singapore. In addition, he also worked for the United Overseas Bank (UOB).^[7] Ong has also claimed to have held senior leadership positions at the RBC, Rabobank International, UOB and Bank Sarasin-Rabo. These claims have been disputed by Councillor Lee Vandervis, who has accepted that Ong's work experience had included lower-level banking.^[7]

During the 2025 Dunedin City Council election, Ong campaigned on a platform of economic expertise and leadership, citing his investment banking career and making use of Facebook to connect with voters.^[7][6] On 11 October 2025, he was elected to the Dunedin City Council with 2,596 votes. He also contested the 2025 Dunedin mayoral election, coming in eighth place with 16,874 votes. During the 2025 election campaign, Ong was the highest-spending candidate, spending $44,098.72 on his campaigns.^[8]

On 19 December 2025, Ong filed a code of conduct complaint against fellow Councillor John Chambers for allegedly making "discriminatory comments" against Dunedin's South Asian community during a workshop on 12 December. Chambers has disputed Ong's allegations.^[8][9] Despite being instructed by DCC CEO Sandra Graham not to compromise the investigation by making public comments, Ong published a social media post in mid-January 2026 detailing his complaint against Chambers and accused Graham of being derelict in her duties by not disciplining Chambers.^[10][8]

On 5 February 2026, Graham filed a code of conduct complaint against Ong. Independent investigator Steph Dyhrberg was appointed to investigate Ong. She was also investigating Ong's complaint against Chambers.^[11][8] On 9 February, Ong shared a transcript of his 27 January interview with Dyhrberg in which he claimed that she had enough evidence to proceed with his complaint against Chambers. Dyhrberg disagreed with the quality of Ong's evidence.^[12]

On 11 February, Ong stated that he would not cooperate with Dyhrberg's investigation into the code of conduct complaint against him.^[13][8] That same day, Dyhrberg dismissed Ong's complaint against Chambers on the grounds it lacked substance and there was "insufficient grounds" to continue the investigation.^[14][8] In response, Ong rejected the findings of Dyhrberg's investigation, saying that he did not consider her or her findings to "be independent."^[8]

In mid February 2026, Graham restricted Ong's access to the Dunedin Civic Centre following allegations that he had accosted staff. In response, Ong said that the restriction was a "retaliatory response" against his efforts to promote his debt financing proposals to "freeze future rate rises."^[8][15] In addition, Mayor of Dunedin Sophie Barker barred Ong from participating in informal meetings with Members of Parliament and councils due to several code of conduct violations including his online remarks against Graham. When Ong tried to attend an informal meeting with Labour MPs on 20 February in defiance of this suspension, he was escorted out of the meeting by Councillors Chambers, Doug Hall, Mickey Treadwell and Andrew Simms. In protest, Ong wore tape over his mouth. Ong was also stripped of his role as deputy lead of the technology portfolio.^[16][8]

By early March 2026, Ong had declined to apologise to either CEO Graham or Mayor Barker.^[8] On 10 March, Dyhrberg found that Ong had tried to smear a witness in his code of conduct case against Chambers and that his behaviour amounted to a serious breach of the DCC's code of conduct.^[17][18][3] The Dunedin City Council also convened a meeting on 25 March 2026 to discuss disciplinary sanctions against Ong.^[19][18] In addition, Mayor Barker also sought approval from the DCC to remove Ong as the Council's representative on the Otago Settlers Association and the Toitū Otago Settlers Museum board, and to reduce his annual renumeration from NZ$100,000 to about $84,500.^[20][3] On 21 March, acting DCC chief executive Scott McLean ordered Ong to remove defamatory posts from his social media page relating to the Council disciplinary proceedings against him.^[21]

During the disciplinary meeting on 25 March, the DCC heard the findings of Dyhrberg's code of conduct investigation against Ong, including the attempted discrediting of a witness for not supporting his account of a complaint against Councillor Chambers. Ong was given 30 minutes to speak in his own defence but instead chose to read a passage from Franz Kafka's novel The Trial.^[4][5] The Council, except Ong himself, voted to remove him from his roles as Council Representative on the Otago Settlers Association and the Toitū Otago Settlers Museum board.^[2] The Council also voted by a margin of ten to three votes (Ong, Vandervis and Andrew Simms) to reduce Ong's annual remuneration from NZ$100,000 to $84,496 for councillors due to his lack of additional responsibilities.^[2][5] The Council also voted by a margin of ten to two votes to urge Ong to resign. Councillor Russell Lund disagreed with the motion, arguing that Ong had a right to serve his full term. Lund also unsuccessfully tried to move an amendment that the DCC not adopt Dyhrberg's report and take no disciplinary action against Ong.^[5] In response to the meeting's motions, Ong denied any wrongdoing and rejected calls to resign from the City Council.^[5][2][4]

In early April 2026, the Otago Daily Times reported that Meta Platforms had restricted access to his Facebook account for "security reasons." Ong contested Meta's decision, saying "that politics was behind the move."^[22]

On 21 April 2026, Ong leaked a series of emails discussing the proposed construction of a hotel next to the Forsyth Barr Stadium. Mayor Barker and councillors, including Andrew Simms and Doug Hall, criticised Ong for breaching confidentiality policies and potentially jeopardising a commercial development. In response, Ong claimed he was promoting transparency and "accelerating negotiations" between the council-controlled organisation Dunedin Venues and the Russell Property Group.^[23] Later that week, Ong was ordered to withdraw a statement claiming that the proposed hotel had been confirmed during a council meeting.^[24]

On 29 April 2026, Ong was sent an email notifying him that a complaint that he had breached the Code of Conduct was being investigated. The complaint related to the leaking of two emails concerned the hotel associated with the stadium. It was reported that he leaked that email to other councillors, council staff and several members of the press within six minutes of receiving it.^[25]

Dunedin City councillors accepted the Code of Conduct report at a meeting on 18 May 2026, and suspended Ong from all committees and subcommittees for nine months. His access to confidential information and ability to attend non-public workshops were restricted earlier in the month.^[26]

On 30 January 2026, the DCC voted by a margin of 12-2 to reject Ong's motion requesting a report on recognising "significant philanthropic and corporate contributions with naming rights for select public assets."^[27]

In late March 2026, the Otago Daily Times reported that Ong had unsuccessfully nominated himself to be a director of the media company New Zealand Media and Entertainment's board.^[28]