Submission declined on 15 December 2025 by Afstromen (talk). This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Afstromen 5 months ago. Last edited by Afstromen 5 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 2 December 2025 by Robert McClenon (talk). This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Robert McClenon 6 months ago.

Submission declined on 2 December 2025 by Wikishovel (talk). This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content. LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies: hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references. unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual. copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. Declined by Wikishovel 6 months ago.

Submission declined on 1 December 2025 by Pythoncoder (talk). This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content. LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies: hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references. unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual. copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. Declined by Pythoncoder 6 months ago.

• Comment: This draft is written from the viewpoint of the person who is the subject of the draft, focusing on what the subject or their employer says about them. Biographical notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject.
  This draft does not establish biographical notability. See also Wikipedia is not for resumes. You may ask for advice about biographical notability at the Teahouse.
  This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that one of the biographical notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.
  You may ask for advice about the biographical notability criteria at the Teahouse.
  In particular, see and refer to WP:NCREATIVE for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:02, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: Deleted a few minutes ago at Bahul Ramesh, following proposed deletion. That article was created by a separate account. Wikishovel (talk) 11:28, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

.

Bahul Ramesh is an Indian cinematographer and screenplay writer known that won critical acclaim for his films Kishkinda Kaandam and Eko .^[1][2]His debut movie as a cinematographer was Mandharam released in 2018. But his notable work was mystery thriller Kishkindha Kaandam (2024), for which he wrote the script and handled the cinematography department.^[3][4]In 2025, he once again joined hands with director Dinjith Ayyathan for the Malayalam film Eko. For this film he worked as both writer and cinematographer.^{[5] [6]}He has also worked as a screenwriter for the web series Kerala Crime Files 2 streaming on Disney Hotstar .^[7][8]

Bahul Ramesh hails from Payyanur district, in Kerala.^[9] He completed his bachelors degree in Visual Communication, and began his career Malayalam films. He initially worked for few short films before started shooting feature films.^[10]

Bahul Ramesh began his career as a cinematographer for the 2018 Malayalam film Mandharam, his debut in the industry.^[11][12] However for his 2024 film Kishkindha Kaandam, where he also wrote the screenplay became a commercial success and received critical acclaim.^{[13] [14][15]}The film’s success made him as one of the notable writer and cinematographer in Malayalam industry. He recently reunited with director Dinjith Ayyathan for the movie Eko (2025). For this film he once again worked as both writer and cinematographer.^[16][17]

Both movies Kishkinda Kaandam and Eko were notable for their innovative and non-linear narrative and use of place and its animals as omnipresent players in the drama. Both films deliberately avoid the three act structure and develop in an organic way.

Mandharam(2018)

Kishkindha Kaandam (2024)

Eko (2025)

Kerala Crime Files 2(2024) – Screenwriter

Award Name – Nominated for Best Cinematography for Kishkindha Kaandam (2024)

Award Name – Nominated for Best Writing for Eko (2025)^[4]

• [IMDb profile of Bahul Ramesh](https://www.imdb.com/name/nm8669071/)
• [IndianFilmHistory profile of Bahul Ramesh](https://www.indianfilmhistory.com/crew/bahul-ramesh)