Ataullah Khan
Born	Peshawar valley, Swabi District, British India
Died	1975 (1976)
Occupations	Employee at Imperial Tobacco Company (till 1930s) producer director
Organization	Madhubala Private Ltd.
Works	See below
Spouse	Ayesha Begum
Children	11 (including Madhubala and Chanchal)
Relatives	Kishore Kumar (son-in-law)

Ataullah Khan (died 1975) was an Indian film producer and director. In 1953, he co-founded the production house Madhubala Private Ltd. along with his third daughter, the actress Madhubala; they produced the films Naata (1955), Mehlon Ke Khwab (1960) and Pathan (1962)—the last being also directed by him. At the time, Khan was a subject of significant media scrutiny for his influential, often controversial, management of Madhubala's life and career. He was a primary party in the Naya Daur court case (1956–57), a highly publicized legal battle in the Indian cinematic history.

Beyond Madhubala, three of Khan's other daughters, including Chanchal, also pursued acting careers in the Hindi film industry.

Add to Chopra & both Kumars

Ataullah Khan belonged to the Yusufzai tribe of Pashtuns, from Peshawar valley, originating from Swabi District.^[1] He was educated up to the sixth class level.^[2] He married Ayesha Begum, a lady from Lahore, and they had eleven children, of whom six survived till adulthood: Kaneez Fatima, Altaf, Mumtaz (1933–69), Zeb (born 1934), Shahida and Madhur Bhushan (neé Zahida).^[3][4] The family was Muslim and of middle-class background.^[5]

Khan and his family initially resided in Delhi, where he was employed for approximately fifteen years at the Imperial Tobacco Company. In 1930s, he lost his job, the family's only source of income, and began facing financial constraints.^[6]

In 1939, Khan began working on a film project titled Pathan, though it was shelved and was not revived until 1960.^[7]

In 1941, Khan eventually decided to shift his family to Bombay, where the Hindi film industry was located. While he was unable to land a job for himself, his third daughter, Mumtaz, secured an acting role in Bombay Talkies’ production Basant (1942). Lacking in further opportunities, Khan once again relocated to Delhi, only to return to Bombay in 1944, when Ranjit Studios signed Mumtaz to a contract and made her a full-fledged actress.

By late 1940s, Mumtaz adopted the screen name Madhubala and became one of the leading stars of Hindi cinema. Throughout her career that lasted till mid-1960s, Khan acted as her official manager—choosing her film scripts and directors, managing contracts and laying down rules regarding the time and place of shooting.

---

+

For the upcoming two decades, Mumtaz remained the primary breadwinner of the Khan family.

By late 1940s, Mumtaz had adopted the screen name Madhubala and become one of the leading film stars of Hindi cinema.^[8][9][10] Throughout her career, Khan would act as her official manager, choosing her film scripts and directors, managing contracts and laying down rules regarding the time and place of shooting.^[11]

He fixed her work timings from 8 am to 6 pm, disallowed any media interactions, ... on or off set,

contract clauses: fixed studio timings from 8 am to 6 pm, no visitors allowed on set, full script in advance before filming began and limited media interactions.[CIT: Add Akbar; also explain why he did so?!]^[12]

From the 1940s to early 1960s, Madhubala would remain the primary breadwinner of the family, despite her health struggles with a heart condition (ventricular septal defect), which was diagnosed in 1949 but kept a secret by Khan to avoid jeopardizing her career.^[13] Wary of her health conditions, Khan ensured clauses of no night shootings or outdoor shootings in her film contracts.^[14] Madhubala went on to became one of the biggest Hindi film stars of the era, with

Around this period, his young daughter Mumtaz found work as a child artiste at All India Radio, where Khan came into contact with Rai Bahadur Chunnilal, the manager of Bombay Talkies. Chunnilal promised an acting role for Mumtaz in Bombay—the center of Hindi cinema—and the family thus relocated to Bombay (now Mumbai) in 1941. In Bombay, the family lived in a tin shed in Malad.^[15] Mumtaz secured a role in , for which she was paid ₹150. However, after the studio no longer required child actors, the family returned to Delhi, where Khan took up temporary low-paying employment but continued to face financial difficulties.^[16][10]

In 1944, Khan was summoned by Devika Rani, the head of Bombay Talkies for a role for Mumtaz, following which he decided to settle permanently in Bombay, seeing a prospect for Mumtaz in films. The family re-settled in the cowshed in Malad, which was soon destroyed in the Bombay dock explosion that followed; the family survived as they had gone to a local cinema. Khan was later provided shelter by a friend.^[16][10] In 1944, Mumtaz auditioned at Ranjit Studios and was signed to a three-year contract under which she worked as a child actor and earned ₹300 per month.

According to the journal Swatantra, Khan became involved in film production with collaborations with P. N. Arora.^[17] In April 1953, Khan and Madhubala co-founded the production house Madhubala Private Ltd.^[18][19] Their early announced ventures included a film named Sayyad. Actor Prem Nath director Kamal Amrohi worked on the film, but it was shelved midway for unknown reasons, running the comapny into a financial loss of ₹3 lakhs.^[20] Later projects like Mehbooba and Kisan Ki Gai were not finished either,^[21] A big-budget historical project titled Shan-e-Awadh, with story by Wajahat Mirza, was scrapped for no reason other than that the director's late coming infuriated Khan.^[20] By 1955, the production house was reported to have suffered a cumulative loss of ₹7 lakhs.^[22]

In 1955, Khan and Madhubala began production of D. N. Madhok's drama Naata, which was released in December, marking the debut of their production house. The film, starring Madhubala and Abhi Bhattacharya,^[22] was poorly received by then-leading editor Baburao Patel, who called it "a dull, poor and clumsy picture" and "a hazard to exhibitors".^[23] Conversely, a critic for Swatantra described Naata as a "commendable venture" for "providing clean, wholesome and neat fare devoid of any cheapness and vulgarity".^[17] Naata proved to be a failure at the box office, forcing the father-daughter to mortgage a bungalow to recover the financial loss.^[20]

Through Naata, Khan brought public attention to his another daughter, Zeb, who used the screen name Chanchal.^[24] She later notably played supporting characters in the films Mother India (1957) and Jis Desh Mein Ganga Behti Hai (1960).^[25]

In 1956, Khan became involved in a high-profile lawsuit against film director B. R. Chopra. Madhubala was signed as the female lead in Chopra's Naya Daur. After filming for ten days, Chopra scheduled an outdoor shoot in Bhopal, for which Khan refused to allow her to travel. Khan cited his concerns for his daughter's safety in a region then known for dacoity—as well as his established preference for her to work within the controlled environments of Bombay studios. The filming thus came to a halt; and Chopra faced financial pressures and eventually sued Madhubala for breach of contract, seeking to recover the ₹32,000 advance he had paid Khan for Madhubala.

The trials took place in early 1957, with Bunny Reuben defines as the "most sensational court-case ever to be fought in the annals of Indian cinema". During the trial, Chopra alleged that Madhubala "was reluctant to work because of the fear of her father". A letter from Chopra to the Film Federation of India was submitted as an exhibit, describing the struggles of filmmakers against difficult film stars and their "custodians".

The trials also brought significant attention to the romantic involvement of Madhubala and Dilip Kumar, the film's leading actor, to whom Khan was reportedly was antagonised against. On later hearings, Khan alleged in court that the case was filed against his daughter "out of spite" conspired by Kumar who was a close associate of Chopra. The case did not reach any conclusion as Chopra himself withdrew the case before the defence (Khan and Madhubala) could call its own witnesses. Khan is later said to have dismissed the lawsuit as a publicity stunt by Chopra to gain attention for his film.

Khan is often credited with the break-up of Madhubala and Kumar, who were a highly publicized couple during the 1950s. In his autobiography Dilip Kumar: The Substance and the Shadow (2014), Kumar clarified that Khan was not against their decision to marry, but rather attempted to turn the relationship into a business proposal, by demanding that Kumar work exclusively under Khan's film productions. Kumar said that he found it difficult to "surrender to [Khan's] dictates and strategies" unlike Madhubala, and eventually broke off the relationship.

---

After Khan's refusal to allow Madhubala to travel, and he refused to allow Madhubala to work further on the film. Having invested significantly on the project, director B. R. Chopra refused to change the film's shooting schedule, and went on to

One covert reason that has also been suggested is that Khan was upset over Madhubala's affair with the leading actor Dilip Kumar. According to author Khatija Akbar, Khan's opposition stemmed from the fear of losing his primary source of income to marriage. Madhubala and Kumar had previously co-starred in a number of films and were involved in a highly publicized affair since 1951; Khan reportedly saw the outdoor shoot for Naya Daur as a mere ruse to allow more intimacy between the stars in his absence.

The case earned significant media coverage when Dilip Kumar testified against Khan and Madhubala, calling them unprofessional and citing his long-term conflict with Khan for his difficult reputation. Meanwhile through the four-month trial, Chopra successfully recast Madhubala with Vyjayantimala and finished his film. Naya Daur was released by August 1957, and Chopra withdrew the case before the defence (Khan and Madhubala) could call its own witnesses.

The Naya Daur court case marked the break-up of Madhubala and Kumar. The couple was said to have been engaged by mid-1950s and seriously contemplating marriage; Madhubala broke her father's protocol to make a public appearance at Kumar's film priemere of Insaniyat in 1955. Kumar later wrote in his autobiography that Khan was initially not against their relationship, and was actually pleased at the prospects of "having two stars under the same roof". But at one point, Khan expressed his desire for Kumar to work exclusively under his production house after marriage. Kumar found his demand problematic, as he was very selective about the quality of projects he did, and he was not ready to . He refused, which led to a strain between him and Khan, who eventually convinced Madhubala that Kumar was being impudent towards him. The conflict over Naya Daur court case ultimately marked the end of the relationship. [Frame this paragraph as Kumar's POV, not as facts] Conversely, Kaniz and Madhur Bhushan have provided a separate account for the break-up: Kumar wanted Madhubala to sever all her ties with her family after marriage; Madhubala refused, as the family were all financially dependent on her at that time, and ultimately parted ways with Kumar.

Despite their break-up in 1957, Madhubala and Kumar continued the filming of K. Asif's Mughal-e-Azam, a lavishly produced film long in making since early 1950s. Khan was generally unethusiatic of the film, but Madhubala accepted it as she saw it as a means to prove her mettle as an actress. His regular presence at the sets complicated the already troubled production: Khan was unsupportive of Asif's protracted style of filmmaking, and many a times threatened to pull her out of the production in vain, and Asif found it difficult to film romantic scenes between Madhubala and Kumar in his presence, often employing others to distract him while filming. [Does the following incident deserve to be mentioned? --> At one instance, Kumar was required to slap Madhubala for the film, he was upset at her and ended up slapping her hard on multiple retakes. An upset Madhubala left the set briefly, but Khan was infuriated and pulled out a pistol threatening to hurt Kumar. He was eventually pacified by Asif, who insisted that he had asked Kumar to slap her hard for the real effect of acting. <--]

The overall filming period of Mughal-e-Azam was particularly taxing for Madhubala, who filmed a number of physically exhausting sequences that exacerbated her growing health issues, while also filming a number of other projects simultaneously. Khatija Akbar has alleged Khan of making her overwork and compromising her health.^[26] The filming period finished in May 1959, by the time Madhubala's health was aggravating rapidly due to physical exhaustion from Mughal-e-Azam work. She took brief sabbaticals through 1959–1960, while Khan announced two more productions for Madhubala Private Ltd.

Khan returned to film production in 1960 with two films which were shot simultaneously: Mehlon Ke Khwab, a comedy directed by Muhafiz Haider, and Ghar Jawai. Both films starred Kishore Kumar, with whom Madhubala had become increasingly involved with after her breakup with Dilip Kumar.^[27] According to Kishore's biographers Anirudha Bhattacharjee and Parthiv Dhar, Khan readily accepted Kishore into his family, possibly because Madhubala's health was in serious decline and she wished to die as a married woman, and Kishore was willing to marry her. Mehlon Ke Khwab was released in March 1960 and was not a commercial success.^[28] On the other hand, Ghar Jawai (which starred Chanchal as the female lead) remained unreleased, as it failed to garner any distributors' interest.^[29]

In September 1960, Khan revived his directorial project, Pathan, and cast Madhubala and Prem Nath in lead roles.^[30] However, by then Madhubala's health was worsening due to her heart condition, and she was ultimately replaced by Mumtaz.^[31] Pathan was released in 1962 and was another commercial failure. Khan fell on hard times again as Madhubala married Kishore Kumar and retired from films.^[28]

Initially in 1960, it was reported that Khan was considering opening a poultry business and settling in Madras,^[32] but did not proceed further.^[33] By 1964, he sold all of Madhubala's cars,^[28] and also a bungalow that was bought by actress Sadhana.^[34] At the time, he was also supported by his son-in-law Kishore Kumar, who was also bearing Madhubala's medical expenses, and Prem Nath.[CIT:for Kishore]^[35]

Khan's later life was marked by isolation. With Madhubala becoming bedridden, he himself struggled with health issues of old age.[CIT] His younger daughters—Shahida and Zahida—ventured into films with Kishore Kumar's comedy Hum Do Daku (1967), but the film proved to be a box-office bomb.^[36] Madhubala was subsequently planning to make a comeback in the industry with a production project titled Farz Aur Aag, which she wanted to direct, and cast Dilip Kumar. However, she died in February 1969 of heart failure, much to Khan's devastation. According to Zahida, Khan "never could recover from this tragedy". He visited Madhubala's grave daily afterwards, till his own death of a heart attack in 1975.^[37][38][34]

In his heyday, Khan was often referred to as "Khan Saheb" in film circles,^[39] and was a subject of significant media and public attention due to his disputes with film directors and journalists, as well as his hostility toward Dilip Kumar.^[40] Author Khatija Akbar described him as "notoriously uncompromising, egocentric and difficult", belonging to the "old school of harsh disciplinarians".^[41] Music director Naushad called him a "man of principles", but also "very stubborn [who] hurt his own interests by this attitude".^[42]

Film journalist B. K. Karanjia, among the few people in the industry who were close to Khan and his family, wrote: "Ataullah Khan was a dangerous enemy, but as we were to discover, a wonderful friend. [...] I grew to like him, even admire him for his deep knowledge of cinema and for the strict discipline he was able to enforce on his daughter, which should have set an example to other freewheeling stars."^[43] Khan was credited with the creation and maintenance of Madhubala's mysterious persona, with contemporary actress Nimmi remarking that Khan's restrictions "kept her so remote that it was not just the public, even we in the film industry were in awe of her".^[44] An article in Indian Daily Mail (1955) claimed that Khan, in collaboration with film journalists, helped engineer Madhubala’s early public image by dividing the press into opposing pro- and anti-Madhubala camps. This generated publicity that played a key role in establishing her as a major film industry figure by the early 1950s, despite mixed critical and commercial reception.^[21]

Khan's extensive control over Madhubala was often satirised; Filmindia wrote sarcastically in 1957: "Madhubala is so correct and conscientious in her work that if her Pathan father has contracted for twelve tears in a certain scene, she won't shed the thirteenth one. One such tear scene demonstrated on the sets of Ek Saal recently is reported to have moved even producer-director Goel to tears."^[45] In 1958, when a reader asked Baburao Patel "Is Attaullah Khan a genius?", Patel replied, "Yes. In creating trouble."^[46]

Despite accusations of manipulation, Khan remained fiercely protective of his family's reputation and reacted sharply to unfavorable press. According to Madhur Bhushan, he once successfully sued a journalist over defamatory claims about their family background. In 1950, he further clashed with the press following a smear campaign that arose after Madhubala refused to entertain a group of journalists on set. His strained relationship with the media was partially repaired in 1951 through a mediated apology by B. K. Karanjia. The two subsequently developed a friendship, allowing Khan to actively manage Madhubala's public image through Karanjia.^[47]

Karanjia observed that Khan's rigid temperament curtailed Madhubala's career opportunities. Notably, when Frank Capra sought to offer her a Hollywood break during the 1952 International Film Festival of India, Khan reportedly dismissed the proposal, remarking curtly that "she could not eat with forks and knives".^[48] Khan's ventures into filmmaking were criticised by Dilip Kumar, who described him as "not competent" to make good films during the Naya Daur court case. On a later occasion, he also accused Khan of diverting Madhubala's earnings into poorly executed productions. Akbar alleged that Khan made Madhubala overwork despite her health struggles.^[49]

Offering a different perspective on the family dynamic, Madhur Bhushan recalled: "Abba [Khan] was protective and inculcated discipline, but that doesn't mean he was harsh and difficult." She clarified that his strictness—such as forbidding film premieres and parties—stemmed from a desire to shield Madhubala from predatory men. Madhur also refuted claims that he forced Madhubala into the industry as a child, asserting that her sister's love for music and dance led her there naturally, and that Khan eventually became so "caught up chaperoning her" that he abandoned his own career.^[6] Though Madhubala rarely spoke publicly of their relationship, she once shared a childhood memory with Filmfare of "the hearty laughter of my beloved father", and recalled that despite their early poverty, "never for one moment—and I speak with complete honesty—was I left loveless and lonely."^[20]

Major sources: 2) Indian Express articles from 1956-57 on Naya Daur court case (all mentioning him very prominently) 3) Old magazines (Filmindia, Swatantra, Indian Daily Mail, Filmfare-1954 interview etc) discussing his role as producer 4) Madhur Bhushan's interviews 5) B. R. Chopra's views on him (!!)

Films he scrapped? 4. Farz aur Ishq? 5. Sone ki chidiya?

• The Post-Madhubala Years: The draft ends a bit abruptly. Researching his specific interactions with Kishore Kumar during the late 60s (after Madhubala's death) would provide a poignant "aftermath" to his life of control

New source: (Bunny Reuben) https://books.google.co.in/books?id=YrwaAQAAIAAJ&q=ataullah+khan+madhubala&dq=ataullah+khan+madhubala&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&ovdme=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiprpL02v6TAxWvcWwGHU9MCfMQ6AF6BAgNEAM#ataullah%20khan%20madhubala

B. K. Karanjia: https://books.google.co.in/books?id=wONkAAAAMAAJ&q=b+k+karanjia+ataullah+khan&dq=b+k+karanjia+ataullah+khan&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&ovdme=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiW7cLa2_6TAxVfXWwGHQ6AJrMQ6AF6BAgNEAM#Khan

Supplementary: https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/bollywood/heartbreak-talkies-madhubala-meena-kumari/lite/

Khan was involved in 3 cases: 1) against a yellow journalist (recalled by Zahida); 2) against baburao patel; 3) against BR Chopra

Mohan Deep, p. 48: begum as a keep and Madhubala as the mother of a five - year... the mother of a five - year - old child had already appeared in print . Sometimes it is well - nigh impossible to prove or disprove reports , but several stories do have their basis in truth

"Attaullah Khan is really serious and means busi- ness . Their maiden production titled " Nata " will go on the sets soon . The star cast is led by" --- Filmindia

Invited income tax officers over loss of 7 lakhs in production? Above source? Search "Attaullah Khan"

Khan was married to Aayesha Begum and had eleven children, of which six daughters survived till adulthood.

His eldest daughters, Kaneeza Fatima and Altaf Kotwal

Their third daughter, Mumtaz Jehan Begum Dehlavi (1933–1969), adopted the screen name Madhubala and became a leading Hindi film actress. Married to actor-singer Kishore Kumar of the Ganguly family, she died at age 36 due to ventricular septal defect.

Their fourth daughter, Zeb Ataullah, adopted the screen name Chanchal and was a notable Hindi film character actress. She intially married director S. K. Prabhakar, who died. She then married Ibrahim, and as of 2017, resides in Dubai, UAE.

Their fifth daughter, Shahida, adopted adopted the screen name Leena and appeared a few films. She married Vahiduddin Kazi, brother of actor Johnny Walker.

Their sixth daughter, Zahida, adopted the screen name Ganga and appeared in a few films. She married music composer Brij Bhushan Sahni and changed her name to Madhur Bhushan.

Year	Film	Producer	Director	Notes
1955	Naata	Yes	No	Cast: Madhubala, Chanchal and Abhi Bhattacharya
1960	Mehlon Ke Khwab	Yes	No	Cast: Madhubala, Kishore Kumar, Pradeep Kumar and Chanchal
1962	Pathan	Yes	Yes	Cast: Premnath and Mumtaz

• Mehbooba

Ataullah Khan belonged to the Yusufzai tribe of Pashtuns, from Peshawar valley, originating from Swabi District.^[50] He was educated up to the sixth class level.^[51] He married Ayesha Begum, a lady from Lahore, and they had eleven children, of whom six survived till adulthood: Kaneez Fatima, Altaf, Mumtaz (1933–69), Zeb (born 1934), Shahida and Madhur Bhushan (neé Zahida).^[3][4] The family was Muslim and of middle-class background.^[52]

Khan and his family initially resided in Delhi, where he was employed for approximately fifteen years at the Imperial Tobacco Company. He lost his job in late 1930s, and under financial pressure migrated to Bombay in search of livelihood.

In 1939, Khan began working on a film titled Pathan, but it was shelved and would not be revived until 1960. Instead, Khan's third daughter, a seven year old Mumtaz, gained the attention of Bombay Talkies' head Devika Rani, who gave her acting roles in films. In 1944, Mumtaz signed a contract with Ranjit Studios and emerged as the primary breadwinner of the Khan family. She would later adopt the screen name "Madhubala" and become one of the biggest Hindi film stars by late 1940s. Throughout her two-decade long career, Khan would act as her manager: choosing her film scripts and directors, managing contracts and laying down rules regarding the time and place of shooting. As Madhubala's father, Khan earned a reputation as a controlling and difficult figure in the media.

In 1953, Khan and Madhubala founded the production house, Madhubala Private Ltd. Initial projects—Sayyad, Mehbooba and Kisan Ki Gai—were abandoned due to creative differences between Khan and directors. Its debut release came in Naata (1955), which was a box office failure. Through this film, Khan introduced his daughter Chanchal in a major role.

During 1956–57, Khan was involved in a high-profile court case against director B. R. Chopra. The conflict was over Khan's refusal to allow Madhubala for outdoor shootings for Chopra's film Naya Daur. Khan later produced two films—Mehlon Ke Khwab and Ghar Jawai—in 1960; both featured Chanchal opposite Kishore Kumar. Mehlon Ke Khwab was released in March 1960 to a poor critical reception, while Ghar Jawai remained unreleased as it failed to garner any distributor interest.

In late 1960, Khan announced his ambitious project Pathan, starring Madhubala and Premnath; he later replaced Madhubala with Mumtaz after the former fell ill. Pathan was released in 1962 and became a box office failure. After Madhubala's early retirement, Khan again faced financial problems and eventually sold out his daughter's assets and property, including her fleet of cars and a bungalow that was bought by actress Sadhana. At the time, Khan is also reported to have considered opening a poultry business. He spent most of the 1960s tending to Madhubala, whose health aggravated rapidly due to an incurable heart condition (ventricular septal defect).

Khan's other daughters—Shahida and Zahida—also debuted in films with Kumar's Hum Do Daku (1967); the film was a major flop. Madhubala died at the age of 36, in 1969, leaving Khan devastated. Khan

• Akbar, Khatija (2011). 'I Want to Live': The Story of Madhubala. Hay House. ISBN 978-9386832023.
• Bhattacharjee, Anirudha; Dhar, Parthiv (2022). Kishore Kumar: The Ultimate Biography. Harper Collins India. ISBN 978-9356291713.
• Booch, Harish S.; Doyle, Karing (1962). Star Portrait. Jai Gujerat Press. ISBN 978-0670001040. {{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
• Deep, Mohan (1996). The Mystery and Mystique of Madhubala. New Delhi: Magna Books. ISBN 1906574219.
• Kumar, Dilip (2014). Dilip Kumar: The Substance and the Shadow. Hay House, Inc. ISBN 978-9381398968.
• Pandhye, Anitaa (2020). Ten Classics. Manjul Publishing. ISBN 978-9389647822.
• Wani, Aarti (2016). Fantasy of Modernity. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781107117211.