Submission declined on 19 January 2026 by Rambley (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Rambley 4 months ago. Last edited by Rambley 4 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Askem is a web-based software platform developed by the Finnish company React and Share Oy for website analytics, accessibility monitoring, and user feedback collection. It is primarily used by public sector organisations, universities, and enterprises to improve digital content quality, usability, and accessibility.

The service combines web analytics dashboards, accessibility and quality assurance tools, and in-page feedback components into a single platform.

React and Share Oy is a Finnish limited liability company (osakeyhtiö) registered in the Finnish Business Information System.^[1] The company is headquartered in Helsinki, Finland, and Askem is its primary commercial product.

Askem consists of three main functional areas. All able to work as one tool or separately.

Askem provides web analytics dashboard that allow organisations to monitor key performance indicators, user behaviour, and trends over time. The analytics data is used by content owners to evaluate content effectiveness and support data-driven website development.

The platform includes tool for monitoring website accessibility and content quality. This tool assist organisations in identifying accessibility issues, broken links, and content problems in relation to standards such as the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) and the European Accessibility Act (EAA).

Askem enables page-level user feedback through embedded questions and buttons. Website visitors can indicate whether content was helpful and provide anonymous comments. According to the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, the Askem tool is used to collect feedback and analyse the quality of website content.^[2]

The feedback system is used on both public websites (internet) and internal intranet environments (intranet).

Askem is used by a range of public sector and educational organisations in Finland and abroad.

The City of Helsinki uses Askem on its Helsinki.fi website to monitor content performance and collect user feedback for content development.^[3]

Aalto University uses Askem on its main website to allow editors to collect feedback and improve content structure and usability.^[4]

The Finnish National Agency for Education uses Askem to collect feedback and develop its website content according to its privacy policy documentation.^[5]

The Police University College of Finland lists Askem among the tools used on its website for feedback and content improvement purposes.^[6]

Public sector organisations have reported that Askem supports content owners in understanding user needs and improving the clarity and usability of digital services. Its adoption among Finnish government agencies and universities reflects broader efforts to improve accessibility compliance and user-centred content development.

Web analytics

Web accessibility

User experience