Draft:Algorithmic Sabotage


Algorithmic sabotage is the manipulation of algorithms—particularly those used in recommender systems, content moderation, gig economy platforms, and surveillance—to disrupt their intended functionality, protect user privacy, or protest corporate and state data collection.[1]

Unlike malicious hacking or cyberwarfare, algorithmic sabotage is typically practiced by everyday users, workers, or activists as a form of everyday resistance or digital civil disobedience.[2]

Methods and tactics

Tactics of algorithmic sabotage vary based on the target platform and the objective of the users:

  • Data Poisoning and Noise Generation: Users intentionally feed false, contradictory, or overwhelming amounts of data into an algorithm to dilute its predictive power. An example includes "algorithmic obfuscation," where browser extensions automatically click random ads to destroy the accuracy of user tracking profiles.[3]
  • Gig Worker Coordination: Rideshare and delivery drivers have been documented collectively turning off their applications simultaneously. This fools the platform's pricing algorithm into detecting an artificial shortage of drivers, thereby triggering surge pricing before the drivers log back on to claim the higher rates.[4]
  • Algorithmic Flood Protests: Activists manipulate algorithmic recommendation engines by flooding specific hashtags or audio tracks with irrelevant information. For instance, in 2020, K-pop fans flooded white supremacist hashtags on Twitter with millions of fan videos, rendering the hate speech tracking algorithms and hashtags useless.[5]

Theoretical framework

In media studies and sociology, algorithmic sabotage is analyzed through the lens of power dynamics between human agency and automated governance. Scholars note that because algorithmic systems are inherently rigid and rely on predictable human behavior, they are uniquely vulnerable to collective, unpredictable human interventions.[2]

See also

References

  1. ^ Veliz, Carissa (2021). "Privacy Is Power: Why and How You Should Take Back Control of Your Data". Oxford University Press: 112–115.
  2. ^ a b Ferrari, Fabian; Graham, Mark (2021-03-15). "Frictional algorithmic governance: Feedbacks, resistance, and alternative futures". Big Data & Society. 8 (1). doi:10.1177/20539517211003166.
  3. ^ Brunton, Finn; Nissenbaum, Helen (2015). Obfuscation: A User's Guide for Privacy and Protest. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. ISBN 9780262029070.
  4. ^ Siddiqui, Faiz (2019-05-08). "Uber and Lyft drivers are manipulating algorithms to force surge pricing". The Washington Post.
  5. ^ Coscarelli, Joe (2020-06-03). "How K-Pop Fans Became an Activist Force". The New York Times.

Category:Algorithmic culture Category:Digital rights Category:Civil disobedience Category:Privacy

References

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.