Search Results: Wikipedia:USINGPRIMARY
Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Wikipedia:Identifying and using primary sources
Senin, 2026-05-04 21:33:29Identifying and using primary sources requires careful thought and some extra knowledge on the part of Wikipedia's editors. In determining the type of...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Peer review/Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC)/archive1
Minggu, 2016-04-03 11:06:46a lot of primary sources are used in this article (see the essay WP:USINGPRIMARY for more details) I suggest including more WP:WIKILINKs to other related...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC 157
Sabtu, 2025-11-29 07:42:442012 (UTC) Secondary sources are not required at this point, per WP:USINGPRIMARY#Secondary_sources_for_notability: "It is difficult, if not impossible...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 July 1
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:43:29in NTDTV program, not for notability, and might met the policy of WP:USINGPRIMARY. If not, what to do is just to delete that link and related information...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 December 17
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:00:462012 (UTC) Secondary sources are not required at this point, per WP:USINGPRIMARY#Secondary_sources_for_notability: "It is difficult, if not impossible...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Chang
Selasa, 2026-01-06 21:36:46in NTDTV program, not for notability, and might met the policy of WP:USINGPRIMARY. If not, what to do is just to delete that link and related information...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 165
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:46:29sources: It seems clear that this is a primary source. See WP:PSTS; WP:USINGPRIMARY ("The first published source for any given fact is always considered...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 111
Jumat, 2023-06-16 22:20:27saying those words. This is exactly the sort of situation in which WP:USINGPRIMARY sources is wholly reliable. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:54, 8 December 2011...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 114
Senin, 2023-01-30 15:51:47how to identify secondary sources, such as WP:Party and person or WP:USINGPRIMARY. Being a pop sci book does not make the source primary, just like being...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 252
Minggu, 2022-03-27 01:57:08There is more about primary sources in the explanatory supplement WP:USINGPRIMARY The first published source for any given fact is always considered a...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 117
Sabtu, 2026-02-28 23:56:09be reliable. You may certainly {{Cite sign}}... but you would be WP:USINGPRIMARY sources, and one of the major (probably insurmountable) problems with...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 144
Kamis, 2026-04-16 19:27:58WP:OR and the instructions on how to use primary sources detailed in WP:USINGPRIMARY are laid out. - Wanderer602 (talk) 21:33, 25 February 2013 (UTC) Comprehending...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard/Archive 88
Kamis, 2022-10-27 11:23:49sources are reliable sources. I don't think you have read WP:RS or WP:USINGPRIMARY. Can you explain why you think this YouTube video is a reliable source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests/Archive 130
Jumat, 2023-03-03 17:07:06order to the chaos I think. I have WP:BRD and WP:MEDRS along with WP:USINGPRIMARY bookmarked, lol. And thanks for the advice to start from the bottom-up...
Click to read more »