DOKUMEN123.COM

Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia. The amount of information on Wikipedia is practically unlimited, but Wikipedia does not aim to contain all knowledge...

04:28, 22 May 2008 (UTC) Delete, WP:NOTLINK.  Esradekan Gibb  "Talk" 05:32, 22 May 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTLINK. Article is full of external links...

protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) WP:NOTLINK, article holds no actual information. It's been tagged as a stub for an...

that's correct. Nick-D (talk) 07:59, 1 April 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTLINK and as it doesn't meet WP:WEB. Nick-D (talk) 07:58, 1 April 2009 (UTC)...

for nearly three years and remains as a simple web-directory page. WP:NOTLINK is pretty clear here; lists are useful as a means of navigating and summarising...

April 2011 (UTC) Delete - not a single entry with article, pure spam, WP:NOTLINK.--96.23.34.3 (talk) 01:36, 13 April 2011 (UTC) Delete - unreferenced; no...

the expansion/cleanup. The External links section seems to violate WP:NOTLINK (IMO). I believe only the Japanese Film Database and IMDB should be here...

Wikipedia is not a directory of sources or a repository of links (WP:NOTLINK and WP:LINKFARM). Moreover the articles are advocacy WP:FORKs created by...

been created solely as a list of external links to videos, contrary to WP:NOTLINK. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:22, 22 August 2009 (UTC) Please do not delete...

nom / WP:NOT Faradayplank (talk) 01:37, 22 June 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTLINK--Finalnight (talk) 16:58, 26 June 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

Wikipedia is not a directory of sources or a repository of links (WP:NOTLINK and WP:LINKFARM). Moreover the articles are advocacy WP:FORKs created by...

subject. ... discospinster talk 23:50, 10 April 2011 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTLINK.--96.23.34.3 (talk) 02:45, 11 April 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

(talk) RT 03:55, 28 May 2008 (UTC) Comment Sorry you feel that way mate. WP:NOTLINK and WP:DEL#REASON seem like more than "fine print" to me but to each their...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete per WP:NOTLINK. teh spirit of WP:NOT. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 20:54, 5 December...

third-party links to active drive-in theaters, violating WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOTLINK. Blatant WP:OR given the outright lack of sources and terms such as "Until...

Wikipedia is not Consumer Reports, and this article runs afoul of WP:NOTLINK; the tabular presentation of the companies' rate structures doesn't change...

watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Straightforward violation of WP:NOTLINK. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 04:08, 17 April 2009 (UTC) Keep. This is...

webpage (in this case, the U.S. government) violates WP:NOTLINK. Should an exception to NOTLINK be made for what a consensus perceives to be a useful list...

language versions. And including a list of download links can be violating WP:NOTLINK. Not able to read into Hungarian or Slovak, I am calling it here with a...

15:36, 12 September 2013 (UTC) To further build if you actually read WP:NOTLINK this is exactly what this article is, a repositiory of external links....

particularly notable either. bd2412 T 18:31, 23 January 2011 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTLINK.--70.80.234.196 (talk) 20:07, 23 January 2011 (UTC) Delete. Lists of patents...

AndrewWTaylor (talk) 20:39, 25 June 2013 (UTC) Strong delete - per WP:NOTLINK and WP:NOTDIR. This is just a collection of external links that have online...

babble 22:33, 20 July 2010 (UTC) Delete - clear case of WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOTLINK.--70.80.234.196 (talk) 00:29, 21 July 2010 (UTC) Delete per cogent arguments...

update/improve. Delete as per WP:NOTADVERTISING , WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:NOTLINK, . Requires regular cleanup to remove WP:SOAP and promotional materials...

district. Dr. Blofeld 10:28, 9 September 2010 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:NOTLINK. I'd also like to suggest adding List of Villages in Panchkula District...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Reason: Delete per WP:CFORK, WP:PROMO, WP:NOTLINK, WP:NOTDIRECTORY and per discussion at Talk:Opera Repertory of the Salzburg...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTLINK This is just a collection of links that has no value to the reader or any...

and Power Devices that can be paired with the C6455 devices". Fails WP:NOTLINK. Unencyclopedic and is a copy of this which is licensed under CCA-SA 3...

next issue WP:NOT Which carries the two sub categories WP:NOTPROMO and WP:NOTLINK, as the subject's article appears designed to promote his interests and...

exact copy of Voice over Internet Protocol, would this not violate WP:NOTLINK ? If that were the case, I'd have to say Blank or Delete. 207.237.33.36...

–Juliancolton | Talk 03:19, 17 April 2009 (UTC) Delete a classic violation of WP:NOTLINK and WP:NOTDIRECTORY. --Russavia Dialogue 04:20, 17 April 2009 (UTC) Keep...

claims are not appropriately supported via reliable, independent sources WP:NOTLINK. Unclear criteria for inclusion in this list makes it difficult to upkeep...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article is a collection of internal links. WP:NOTLINK Jamez42 (talk) 19:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC) Keep. First, if an article...

content and is basically just a list of internal links. in violation of WP:NOTLINK. The only third-party source currently included makes a passing reference...

Youtube videos are on Youtube. Article therefore fails WP:ELNO and WP:NOTLINK. This has been explained before to the article's creator. --Escape Orbit...

notability guidelines, notability guidelines for stand-alone lists, WP:NOTLINK/WP:NOTDIR, and probably several other guidelines or policies I failed to...

for some of those court. This seems to fall under both WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOTLINK. Perhaps if some of the First Amendment discussion directly related to...

need to determine is whether it fits with WP article guidelines and WP:NOTLINK is a strong case for deletion. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 19:25, 20 July...

Milburn (talk) 23:54, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Variously violates WP:NOTLINK, WP:IINFO, and (in such portions of entries as "Age" and "Era") WP:OR....

consensus is that mere lists of links do not belong in an encyclopedia. WP:NOTLINK There are few facts in the article, and the links do not serve as verifying...

intended to prevent. In addition, such a list fails WP:NOTADVERTISING and WP:NOTLINK. What do you find unclear here? Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 23:34...

textbook NOTLAW (WP:NOTLAW) – Wikipedia is not governed by statute NOTLINK (WP:NOTLINK) – Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or...

added by 132.236.167.183 (talk • contribs) Delete per WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOTLINK.--137.122.49.102 (talk) 14:11, 14 April 2010 (UTC) How do we tell the diference...

organizational and navigational aids to articles within WP, per point 2 in WP:NOTLINK. If you are concerned about the content of the article, add it to your...

collection of external links or an internet directory, it is contrary to WP:NOTLINK.  JGHowes  talk 15:51, 4 May 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

inline}} – inline template to flag external links that may fail WP:EL or WP:NOTLINK. (Template deleted September 12, 2011) {{Fact-now}} – pointless wrapper...

used by a number of pages --Keith 10:46, 12 December 2008 (UTC) See WP:NOTLINK. Wikipedia isn't a collection of links, it's an encyclopedia. I think your...

like it needs it.  Atyndall93 | talk  10:53, 22 May 2008 (UTC) Delete, WP:NOTLINK.  Esradekan Gibb  "Talk" 11:08, 22 May 2008 (UTC) *Keep Article is in a...

WP:INDISCRIMINATE does not apply here (neither does WP:PRODUCT) - in fact, WP:NOTLINK even explicitly excludes disambiguation pages and lists: "Internal links...

JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 18:42, 17 July 2010 (UTC) *Delete per nom and WP:NOTLINK. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 20:35, 17 July 2010 (UTC) Keep - Looking more...

nom on this one. Jclemens (talk) 16:33, 28 October 2010 (UTC) Delete WP:NOTLINK says Wikipedia articles are not a mere collections of external links or...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTLINK. Wizard191 (talk) 14:20, 12 April 2010 (UTC) Delete- Wikipedia is not a...

history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) WP:NOTDIRECTORY/WP:NOTLINK ninety:one 16:50, 11 October 2008 (UTC) Delete. This list does not only...

(talk|contribs) 17:50, 24 April 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOTLINK.--70.80.234.196 (talk) 19:54, 24 April 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDIRECTORY...

13 December 2013 (UTC) Delete If WP:NOT applies, it is most likely WP:NOTLINK. This is a mere re-packaging of links to chapters as can be found on the...

party sources. Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:29, 21 May 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTLINK. If any of these organisations were notable enough to have an article,...

Michael Hardy (talk) 06:30, 11 March 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:ORG and WP:NOTLINK, WP:NOTWEBSPACE and WP:PROMOTION.--137.122.49.102 (talk) 18:13, 10 March...

TWL) Article is primarily a massive linkfarm. Blatant violation of WP:NOTLINKS policy. Talk page indicates it has been speedily-deleted before, and possibly...

this article should be deleted: WP:NOTSOAPBOX , WP:NOTADVERTISING , WP:NOTLINK , WP:GNG , WP:NRVE and WP:MADEUP; The user who created the page has less...

(talk) 19:53, 18 June 2010 (UTC) Delete - a clear cut case of WP:NOTDIR, WP:NOTLINK.--137.122.49.102 (talk) 17:30, 18 June 2010 (UTC) Comment - note that the...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete Indiscriminate list of external links. See WP:NOTLINK. Wikipedia is not meant to be used by people to advertise their products/projects...

WP:NOTDIR, WP:NOTLINK and WP:SOAP. Wikipedia should not be used for self promotion - that's exactly what this page is for. I think WP:NOTLINK is particularly...

this article. There are now 25 links on this article, falling foul of WP:NOTLINK and WP:SPAM. Additionally, most of those links are not independent of the...

may add.--Yaksar (let's chat) 19:42, 5 March 2011 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTLINK and WP:ELNO.--137.122.49.102 (talk) 21:13, 4 March 2011 (UTC) Comment:...

Wikipedia is NOT. Take a look at WP:NOT, and specifically at WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOTLINK to see what this means, and perhaps to find some good places on the web...

the cited websites are arguably the most useful part of the article!) WP:NOTLINK. I don't think WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is a good reason for keeping this either...

to howtos and reviews... This is not a Wikipedia article's purpose. WP:NOTLINK states the following: "Wikipedia is neither a mirror nor a repository of...

copies (if not actually copies) of the laws themselves. As noted in WP:NOTLINK, Wikipedia is not a place for public domain content that is meaningless...

is, until this comment). Pretty sure it's a violation of WP:EL and WP:NOTLINK. If you don't have an image, then you don't have an image. Take a list...

is, until this comment). Pretty sure it's a violation of WP:EL and WP:NOTLINK. If you don't have an image, then you don't have an image. Take a list...

for the trailer would fall under http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NOTLINK That trailer and other trailers are posted on the Anachrodox website which...

web-host for images. BencherliteTalk 02:37, 1 July 2009 (UTC) Delete - Per WP:NOTLINK. Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 09:27, 1 July 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

Secondly, the German article as it stands now is also in violation WP:NOTLINK. When I first re-formatted Diplomatic missions of Russia back in September...

listed for comparison, which contain numerous wikilinks, this one fails WP:NOTLINK. Also it would have to be permanently tagged as outdated.--Northernhenge...

April 2014 (UTC) Comment - Do the last five external links go against WP:NOTLINK? Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:12, 27 April 2014 (UTC) I think all of...

(bookmaker) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Template violates WP:NOTLINK and currently only links to one article. Armbrust Talk to me about my editsreview...

and WP:INDISCRIMINATE list. Depending on how one construes things, WP:NOTLINK may also apply. At best, it could be split up and merged to Further Reading...

and WP:INDISCRIMINATE list. Depending on how one construes things, WP:NOTLINK may also apply. At best, it could be split up and merged to Further Reading...

follow-up discussion about this. I do not think this template meets the WP:NOTLINK policy or the Wikipedia:External links guideline: it is not Wikipedia's...

Erpert (let's talk about it) 18:15, 7 December 2010 (UTC) Because per WP:NOTLINK this does not merit its own article. We already have a huge list here on...

Jontyla (talk) 00:53, 8 October 2011 (UTC) COMMENT - completely fails WP:NOTLINK: "Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media...

which were not accompanied with reliable sources per WP:V, WP:RS and WP:NOTLINK. My deletion resulted in this version. I have asked this user to remove...

Wikipedia is about verifiability, not "it exists, so we must include it." WP:NOTLINK. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 02:29, 20 April 2011 (UTC) ok? The article is...

WP:NOT. The only provision of NOT that has been successfully advanced is WP:NOTLINK#1, also known as LINKFARM. I say that, if the article was rewitten to be...

something, let me know. Blueboar (talk) 14:01, 22 July 2009 (UTC) Doesn't WP:NOTLINK apply here? I would feel comfortable deleting the whole bunch, with a pointer...

useful for a reader of the article. The latter two I feel fall under WP:NOTLINK. LessHeard vanU (talk) 14:07, 8 February 2010 (UTC) Hi, the latter two...

are taking responsibility for their addition and it’s compliance with WP:NOTLINK and WP:EL. In contrast, Tom.Reding’s unauthorised task, as admitted above...

and WP:INDISCRIMINATE list. Depending on how one construes things, WP:NOTLINK may also apply. At best, it could be split up and merged to Further Reading...

Wikipedia is not a directory of sources or a repository of links (WP:NOTLINK and WP:LINKFARM). Moreover the articles are advocacy WP:FORKs created by...

04:28, 22 May 2008 (UTC) Delete, WP:NOTLINK.  Esradekan Gibb  "Talk" 05:32, 22 May 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTLINK. Article is full of external links...

pages in infoboxes. In my opinion, doing so would violate WP:SOAP, WP:NOTLINK and WP:ELNO, all policies that work well at present (proposed changes to...

link. Johnuniq (talk) 04:05, 10 November 2009 (UTC) Oppose.WP:ELNO, WP:NOTLINK and WP:RS for starters. Un-impressive site statistics. Only been around...

oppose AC is not a source, and it violates existing policy anyway (WP:NOTLINK & WP:EL). ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 16:31, 4 July 2021 (UTC) Oppose...

dictionary entries, definitions, or slang or jargon guides External links WP:NOTLINK Collections of external links not providing relevant information to a notable...

qualifies A5. b)WP:FORUM may qualify A11 c)WP:SOAP qualifies G11 d)WP:NOTLINK may qualify A3 or A5 e)WP:NOTWEBHOST may qualify A7 etc... But what of...

webpage (in this case, the U.S. government) violates WP:NOTLINK. Should an exception to NOTLINK be made for what a consensus perceives to be a useful list...

watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View AfD) Straightforward violation of WP:NOTLINK. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 04:08, 17 April 2009 (UTC) Keep. This is...

next issue WP:NOT Which carries the two sub categories WP:NOTPROMO and WP:NOTLINK, as the subject's article appears designed to promote his interests and...

relevant policies/guidelines include WP:U, WP:COI, WP:SPAM, WP:EL, and WP:NOTLINK. KitchenKop, I suggest changing your username or starting a new account...

babble 22:33, 20 July 2010 (UTC) Delete - clear case of WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOTLINK.--70.80.234.196 (talk) 00:29, 21 July 2010 (UTC) Delete per cogent arguments...

that's correct. Nick-D (talk) 07:59, 1 April 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTLINK and as it doesn't meet WP:WEB. Nick-D (talk) 07:58, 1 April 2009 (UTC)...

(talk) RT 03:55, 28 May 2008 (UTC) Comment Sorry you feel that way mate. WP:NOTLINK and WP:DEL#REASON seem like more than "fine print" to me but to each their...

protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View AfD) WP:NOTLINK, article holds no actual information. It's been tagged as a stub for an...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete per WP:NOTLINK. teh spirit of WP:NOT. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 20:54, 5 December...

-- dsprc [talk] 04:55, 17 September 2015 (UTC) Delete Per WP:LISTN and WP:NOTLINK. Wikipedia is not a directory, and not a repository of links to external...

intended to prevent. In addition, such a list fails WP:NOTADVERTISING and WP:NOTLINK. What do you find unclear here? Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 23:34...

and WP:INDISCRIMINATE list. Depending on how one construes things, WP:NOTLINK may also apply. At best, it could be split up and merged to Further Reading...

third-party links to active drive-in theaters, violating WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOTLINK. Blatant WP:OR given the outright lack of sources and terms such as "Until...

collection of external links or an internet directory, it is contrary to WP:NOTLINK.  JGHowes  talk 15:51, 4 May 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

for nearly three years and remains as a simple web-directory page. WP:NOTLINK is pretty clear here; lists are useful as a means of navigating and summarising...

15:36, 12 September 2013 (UTC) To further build if you actually read WP:NOTLINK this is exactly what this article is, a repositiory of external links....

content and is basically just a list of internal links. in violation of WP:NOTLINK. The only third-party source currently included makes a passing reference...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTLINK. Wizard191 (talk) 14:20, 12 April 2010 (UTC) Delete- Wikipedia is not a...

the article(s) in question is key: does the link really add to it? WP:NOTLINK also reminds us that Wikipedia is not simply a collection of external links:...

WP:INDISCRIMINATE does not apply here (neither does WP:PRODUCT) - in fact, WP:NOTLINK even explicitly excludes disambiguation pages and lists: "Internal links...

district. Dr. Blofeld 10:28, 9 September 2010 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:NOTLINK. I'd also like to suggest adding List of Villages in Panchkula District...

Wikipedia is not Consumer Reports, and this article runs afoul of WP:NOTLINK; the tabular presentation of the companies' rate structures doesn't change...

Milburn (talk) 23:54, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Variously violates WP:NOTLINK, WP:IINFO, and (in such portions of entries as "Age" and "Era") WP:OR....

history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) WP:NOTDIRECTORY/WP:NOTLINK ninety:one 16:50, 11 October 2008 (UTC) Delete. This list does not only...

organizational and navigational aids to articles within WP, per point 2 in WP:NOTLINK. If you are concerned about the content of the article, add it to your...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Reason: Delete per WP:CFORK, WP:PROMO, WP:NOTLINK, WP:NOTDIRECTORY and per discussion at Talk:Opera Repertory of the Salzburg...

this article. There are now 25 links on this article, falling foul of WP:NOTLINK and WP:SPAM. Additionally, most of those links are not independent of the...

for some of those court. This seems to fall under both WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOTLINK. Perhaps if some of the First Amendment discussion directly related to...

party sources. Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:29, 21 May 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTLINK. If any of these organisations were notable enough to have an article,...

nom on this one. Jclemens (talk) 16:33, 28 October 2010 (UTC) Delete WP:NOTLINK says Wikipedia articles are not a mere collections of external links or...

used by a number of pages --Keith 10:46, 12 December 2008 (UTC) See WP:NOTLINK. Wikipedia isn't a collection of links, it's an encyclopedia. I think your...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article is a collection of internal links. WP:NOTLINK Jamez42 (talk) 19:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC) Keep. First, if an article...

Jontyla (talk) 00:53, 8 October 2011 (UTC) COMMENT - completely fails WP:NOTLINK: "Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media...

and Power Devices that can be paired with the C6455 devices". Fails WP:NOTLINK. Unencyclopedic and is a copy of this which is licensed under CCA-SA 3...

below. Below is the text from WP:NOTLINK: "Wikipedia is not a ... repository of links ... Policy shortcuts: WP:NOTLINK ... Wikipedia is neither a mirror...

Michael Hardy (talk) 06:30, 11 March 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:ORG and WP:NOTLINK, WP:NOTWEBSPACE and WP:PROMOTION.--137.122.49.102 (talk) 18:13, 10 March...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete Indiscriminate list of external links. See WP:NOTLINK. Wikipedia is not meant to be used by people to advertise their products/projects...

particularly notable either. bd2412 T 18:31, 23 January 2011 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTLINK.--70.80.234.196 (talk) 20:07, 23 January 2011 (UTC) Delete. Lists of patents...

Erpert (let's talk about it) 18:15, 7 December 2010 (UTC) Because per WP:NOTLINK this does not merit its own article. We already have a huge list here on...

(UTC) Delete and transwiki to Wikisource per WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:NOTLINK. The entire content of this list is a copy and paste from the Hitchcock...

consensus is that mere lists of links do not belong in an encyclopedia. WP:NOTLINK There are few facts in the article, and the links do not serve as verifying...

TWL) Article is primarily a massive linkfarm. Blatant violation of WP:NOTLINKS policy. Talk page indicates it has been speedily-deleted before, and possibly...

this article should be deleted: WP:NOTSOAPBOX , WP:NOTADVERTISING , WP:NOTLINK , WP:GNG , WP:NRVE and WP:MADEUP; The user who created the page has less...

April 2011 (UTC) Delete - not a single entry with article, pure spam, WP:NOTLINK.--96.23.34.3 (talk) 01:36, 13 April 2011 (UTC) Delete - unreferenced; no...

nom / WP:NOT Faradayplank (talk) 01:37, 22 June 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTLINK--Finalnight (talk) 16:58, 26 June 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

AndrewWTaylor (talk) 20:39, 25 June 2013 (UTC) Strong delete - per WP:NOTLINK and WP:NOTDIR. This is just a collection of external links that have online...

-- dsprc [talk] 04:55, 17 September 2015 (UTC) Delete Per WP:LISTN and WP:NOTLINK. Wikipedia is not a directory, and not a repository of links to external...

13 December 2013 (UTC) Delete If WP:NOT applies, it is most likely WP:NOTLINK. This is a mere re-packaging of links to chapters as can be found on the...

(talk|contribs) 17:50, 24 April 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOTLINK.--70.80.234.196 (talk) 19:54, 24 April 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDIRECTORY...

added by 132.236.167.183 (talk • contribs) Delete per WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOTLINK.--137.122.49.102 (talk) 14:11, 14 April 2010 (UTC) How do we tell the diference...

may add.--Yaksar (let's chat) 19:42, 5 March 2011 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTLINK and WP:ELNO.--137.122.49.102 (talk) 21:13, 4 March 2011 (UTC) Comment:...

Youtube videos are on Youtube. Article therefore fails WP:ELNO and WP:NOTLINK. This has been explained before to the article's creator. --Escape Orbit...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTLINK This is just a collection of links that has no value to the reader or any...

subject. ... discospinster talk 23:50, 10 April 2011 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTLINK.--96.23.34.3 (talk) 02:45, 11 April 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

the External links-section? I should say we should delete them as for WP:NOTLINK; after all, Wikipedia is not meant to draw attention to the Two Circles-website...

copies (if not actually copies) of the laws themselves. As noted in WP:NOTLINK, Wikipedia is not a place for public domain content that is meaningless...

JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 18:42, 17 July 2010 (UTC) *Delete per nom and WP:NOTLINK. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 20:35, 17 July 2010 (UTC) Keep - Looking more...

the cited websites are arguably the most useful part of the article!) WP:NOTLINK. I don't think WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is a good reason for keeping this either...

notability guidelines, notability guidelines for stand-alone lists, WP:NOTLINK/WP:NOTDIR, and probably several other guidelines or policies I failed to...

listed for comparison, which contain numerous wikilinks, this one fails WP:NOTLINK. Also it would have to be permanently tagged as outdated.--Northernhenge...

(UTC) Delete and transwiki to Wikisource per WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:NOTLINK. The entire content of this list is a copy and paste from the Hitchcock...

language versions. And including a list of download links can be violating WP:NOTLINK. Not able to read into Hungarian or Slovak, I am calling it here with a...

pages to be used as references saying they violate WP:EL, WP:SPAM, WP:NOTLINK and WP:OR collectively, however with no other sources available states...

section, which an entire section of external links. Please see WP:EL and WP:NOTLINK for more details. -Reconsider! 05:08, 19 January 2010 (UTC) {{Done}} -...

quickly removed. 03swalker (talk) 19:38, 7 May 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTLINK. Link provides little, if any, use to an article. DiverseMentality (Talk)...

to howtos and reviews... This is not a Wikipedia article's purpose. WP:NOTLINK states the following: "Wikipedia is neither a mirror nor a repository of...

Deconvolution - removed section per EL, NOTLINK Phase contrast microscopy - removed section per EL, NOTLINK Ronz has just bulk-blanked the whole ELs...

argument that it improves the encyclopedia (even if we pretend that WP:NOTLINK has no relevance). I see these listed here at least were all created by...

This article exists only to be a list of websites. That's textbook WP:NOTLINK. WP is not DMOZ, WP is not Yahoo. eaolson (talk) 02:26, 8 June 2008 (UTC)...

This article exists only to be a list of websites. That's textbook WP:NOTLINK. WP is not DMOZ, WP is not Yahoo. eaolson (talk) 02:26, 8 June 2008 (UTC)...

include is somewhat arbitrary, especially when a bibliography is lengthy WP:NOTLINK "collections of external links" - if one construes "external links" broadly...

2017 (UTC) The policies are WP:NOT and WP:POV, especially WP:SOAP and WP:NOTLINK. WP:EL is how we manage external links so as not to violate those policies...

TobiasK (talk · contribs) has recently been adding links to ReviewRoot, a review aggregation site. It seems useful, but I'm not sure if it meets the EL...

are subject to the same criterion. c) Some applicable guidelines are WP:NOTLINK, WP:NOTDIR, WP:NOTWHOSWHO. And common sense. The list would be in the hundreds...

argument that it improves the encyclopedia (even if we pretend that WP:NOTLINK has no relevance). I see these listed here at least were all created by...

April 2014 (UTC) Comment - Do the last five external links go against WP:NOTLINK? Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:12, 27 April 2014 (UTC) I think all of...

are being used instead of redlinks, and really shouldn't exist per WP:NOTLINK. TexasAndroid is absolutely correct that this article needs a good long...

the expansion/cleanup. The External links section seems to violate WP:NOTLINK (IMO). I believe only the Japanese Film Database and IMDB should be here...

update/improve. Delete as per WP:NOTADVERTISING , WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:NOTLINK, . Requires regular cleanup to remove WP:SOAP and promotional materials...

claims are not appropriately supported via reliable, independent sources WP:NOTLINK. Unclear criteria for inclusion in this list makes it difficult to upkeep...