DOKUMEN123.COM

though exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. Shortcuts WP:ORGWP:ORG WP:NORGWP:NORG WP:CORPWP:CORP WP:NCORPWP:NCORP...

"critical mass" [1] and "meetup" [2] if the entries did not already exist. "Norgs" has entered the language in the same way. Many of the blogs cited are read...

(UTC) Delete fails WP:NORG / WP:GNG without better sources. Shooterwalker (talk) 16:53, 9 January 2023 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of...

norg.com.au has 12 links on wikipedia Augie_March Australia_Bali_Memorial_Eye_Centre Faker_(band) Grinspoon Gyroscope_(band) Human_Nature_(band) Josh_Pyke...

put forth in WP:NORG. --Adamant1 (talk) 13:14, 26 June 2021 (UTC) Redirect to List of schools in Bogotá. The article needn't meet WP:NORG: as WP:NSCHOOL...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) contested A7, still unsourced. Fails NORG. dudhhrContribs 23:46, 6 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

(unless they are for-profit) need not meet WP:NORG. See WP:NSCHOOL. While the sourcing here would indeed fail NORG (particularly WP:AUD), the in-depth local...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG. Only one reference and that's self-published. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:18...

article. No indication of notability. Fails to satisfy the requirements of WP:NORG / WP:GNG. DMySon (talk) 18:34, 22 December 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Coverage is just brief mentions/namechecks. Fails WP:NORG. Amon Stutzman (talk) 00:03, 5 July 2022 (UTC) Delete sources are all press-releases...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Clearly fails WP:NORG, no WP:SIGCOV and is currently written in a highly WP:PROMO style. My search...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No assertion of Notabililty, fails WP:NORG Accesscrawl (talk) 07:11, 21 January 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

scholarly articles but cannot locate in-depth sources that would satisfy WP:NORG. The only independent source cited that might have significant coverage is...

mergers in NORG refers to businesses. Coverage on political mergers is by no mean trivial. --Soman (talk) 20:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC) NORG applies equally...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Appears to fail WP:NORG and WP:GNG (Artist doesn't really make sense to compare, FYI.) Missvain (talk)...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Consensus that NORG is not satisfied Nosebagbear (talk) 23:03, 20 October 2019 (UTC) [Hide this...

2009-02-03 11:21:07 (UTC): User w:nl:84.86.253.78 (talk - contribs; 5) to w:nl:Norg (diff - undo) - Link: www.brandweernorg.nl/. * Links added in this diff:...

in-depth coverage to meet the threshold of notability in accordance with WP:NORG. ✗plicit 13:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG, long time have strong advertisement. Possible PR/promo, created from account...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails to meet WP:NORG. No in-depth coverage exists from searches in Google, Google Books, Google...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unconvinced of a WP:GNG or WP:NORG pass. I did a fair amount of WP:BEFORE, including through paywalled archival...

organization, can't find substantive sources establishing that it passes WP:NORG Reywas92Talk 16:35, 21 May 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promotional concerns and clear WP:NORG fail. SportingFlyer T·C 23:04, 19 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG. Per the Electoral Commission of India, there are over 1800 registered unrecognised...

edits outside this topic. Delete - Article's subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. Way WP:TOOSOON for an article. - Aoidh (talk) 09:45, 14 January 2023 (UTC)...

All three articles cover substantially the same material. Notability (WP:NORG). AZCOM and CCOM exist as sister branch campuses, without independent notability...

listing various properties that the company has acquired. Does not meet WP:NORG, WP:GNG. signed, Rosguill talk 19:08, 28 February 2019 (UTC) Keep. As a co-creator...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG. A BEFORE search in English and French finds little more than trivial mentions...

Local cause oriented organization that does not satisfy WP:NORG. It's under the purview of NORG, because it is a "group of more than one person formed together...

is no consensus whether they are sufficient to make the subject pass WP:NORG and WP:GNG, although the slight majority seems to think so. As the closing...

case non-English sources might improve the thing but it seems to fail WP:NORG. Sitush (talk) 10:20, 29 October 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG WP:NBUILD no independent coverage in reliable media. Only press statement...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails to meet WP:NORG guidelines. While references are given, they are mostly passing mentions...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable organization that fails to meet WP:NORG as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG, long time have strong advertisement. Possible PR/promo, created from account...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG and WP:ROUTINE. All routine coverage, every city and town has youth soccer...

WP:NORG. Could not find any reliable sources on the subject. userdude 00:28, 1 April 2020 (UTC) Delete The controlling guideline here is WP:NORG, and...

was delete. I don't see the promotional tone here but this is a clear WP:NORG fail. No prejudice against recreation with better sources. A Traintalk 20:03...

was keep. Creative collaborations are a tricky subject with respect to WP:NORG, which could theoretically be interpreted as covering any kind of ensemble...

reliable secondary sources the subject would need to pass either WP:GNG or WP:NORG. As an alternative to deletion the article could be merged or redirected...

it meets GNG - they don't argue that it meets NORG, but instead several !voters pointed out that NORG doesn't compulsarily apply to non for-profit schools...

Declined PROD. Original PROD reason from StraussInTheHouse was "Fails WP:NORG due to lack of multiple, sustained, significant coverage in independent,...

JSTOR · TWL) Non notable organization, that, in my estimation, fails WP:NORG. Only incidental mentions in reliable news sources, yet far fewer medical...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Choir doesn't seem to meet WP:NORG - lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:55,...

lacks the significant coverage in independent sources required to meet WP:NORG. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:57, 23 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

reliability and prominence of non-local sources going towards WP:GNG/WP:NORG/WP:NBUILD, there is some consensus in the discussion that the subject is...

this page.‎ The result was delete. I concur regarding failure to meet WP:NORG and WP:GNG. Thank you everyone for participating and assuming good faith...

April 2021 (UTC)k]] \\ 20:11, 21 April 2021 (UTC) Delete: does not meet WP:NORG; insufficiently notable to be worth a redirect; no need to preserve history...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Completely unsourced article. Organisation failing WP:NORG. Google returns 129 results[1], not a single one pointing to a source independent...

those I did check only FN7 ([4]) was NORG-acceptable. If there are "Zionist organisations" that don't meet NORG they should be nominated for deletion...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG. No SIGCOV, not notable on its own merits. Rogermx (talk) 15:16, 7 May 2020...

piece created by COI editor. No independent references. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG". Article dePRODded by IP (apparently the article creator) stating "My COI:...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. Of the 9 sources only one of them is about N4 and contradicts the article...

Anyway, the rationale still stands: "As a private school, has to meet WP:NORG. No reliable independent sources are provided, and I was unable to find any...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. 2passing mentions and an article written by members of the ONG...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG. Pure promotional article to promote a single political candidate Suresh...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Tourism bureau doesn't seem to meet WP:NORG- lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:44, 17...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:NORG. all refs are just passing mentions about the organisation. -MPGuy2824 (talk)...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG / WP:NSCHOOL. Sources in article and WP:BEFORE are not WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet the WP:NORG level of notability from a quick check and it is almost entirely based off...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NORG. The 2 sources that mention the company are Forbes and Huffpost (that mention...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. The charge that WP:NORG was not meet was not addressed successfully. I do not see a strong case for...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable organization that fails to meet WP:NORG as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent...

in passing and / or WP:SPIP. Awards are not significant. Does not meet WP:NORG / WP:ORGDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 15:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC) Note: This...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 06:58, 24 November 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

left is to propose the article for deletion. Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG Domdeparis (talk) 12:19, 10 April 2017 (UTC) Keep Deletion is never an alternative...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A wing of a political party that fails WP:NORG due to lack of significant independent coverage in reliable media. This subset...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG. All I can find is press releases, no SIGCOV Rogermx (talk) 12:54, 11 May...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. Current article has no sources and is promotional. A quick search of Google...

of those will say "Chharpoka started their journey." Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 04:04, 14 January 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to meet WP:NORG. Only ref is self-published (school website), searching does not find in-depth...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NSCHOOL this school does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG. WP:BEFORE revealed only WP:ROUTINE coverage and brief mentions, nothing...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG. Cannot find any SIGCOV - all the hits I see on Google are generated by the...

@Billhpike: - true, but NORG (as the same as NCORP) is viewed as stricter than GNG, and I'm not sure how Sig Cov is any less in NORG, if anything I'd say...

claim that airports need to meet NORG. You also cite WP:AUD as if that was generally applicable. It is just a part of NORG. If it was a general principle...

credible sources.Rublamb (talk) 15:26, 23 August 2022 (UTC) Keep Now meets WP:NORG with new sources added to the article. They're reliable enough, with some...

in-depth coverage, passing mentions, self-published sources, etc. Fails WP:NORG Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:24, 11 June 2019 (UTC)...

website (fixable), and there are definite doubts about its notability per WP:NORG. At the very least, hopefully this discussion can clarify notability around...

advertising and simply not notable per WP:NORG. JavaHurricane 10:41, 31 October 2020 (UTC) Delete: Fails NORG and GNG. In Polish I see few minor passing...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Association doesn't seem to meet WP:NORG - lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:59,...

Stanford (talk) 15:51, 10 November 2021 (UTC) Delete. This falls under WP:NORG and we don't have the multiple in-depth independent non-local reliable sources...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A wing of a political party that fails WP:NORG due to lack of significant independent coverage in reliable media. This subset...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NORG fail (t · c) buidhe 07:49, 28 March 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG due to a lack of reliable, independent sources that provide significant coverage...

discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:40, 6 March 2022 (UTC) Delete, far from meeting WP:NORG, most coverage is in the form of passing mentions. Tayi Arajakate Talk 15:43...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG. References are either affiliated with subject (the IWW/Starbucks union websites)...

Arabic language publisher, while locally notable and laudable, fails WP:NORG and, ultimately, WP:GNG. Arguably past the bar for Arwiki, not for Enwiki...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable school. Fails WP:NORG and WP:SIGCOV. In terms of: WP:NORG (and WP:NSCHOOL) there is nothing to indicate that this...

of that organization." --Jfhutson (talk) 19:54, 21 May 2021 (UTC) If WP:NORG were the applicable guideline, I'd be tempted to agree. But per WP:NSCHOOL...

meet the requirements of WP:ORGDEPTH, therefore school appears to fail WP:NORG. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:14, 27 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

Delete: does not meet WP:NORG; significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:21, 6 July 2018 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NORG \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10Eleventeen...

about a very small scale charity and I very much doubt that it meets WP:NORG. There may be local press coverage in the States that I can’t access. Mccapra...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG; coverage consists of trivial mentions and coverage in limited-interest publications...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG, WP:NONPROFIT. Run of the mill local organization of no global significance...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Failed WP:NORG. Strictly local political action committee Rogermx (talk) 19:17, 29 August...

Barring something better, it fails WP:NORG. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:39, 7 October 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NORG. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 04:26, 11 October...

notability, doesn't meet WP:GNG nor WP:NORG. - Kevo327 (talk) 14:25, 16 September 2021 (UTC) Delete. Fails GNG and NORG.4meter4 (talk) 20:10, 18 September...

Spiderone 14:01, 21 September 2020 (UTC) Delete: Article does not meet GNG or NORG. Sources do not show notability and BEFORE showed nothing.   // Timothy :: talk ...

major election. --DBigXrayᗙ 06:38, 19 February 2020 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 13:19, 20 February 2020 (UTC) Delete...

forward as meeting SIGCOV - given that this organisation would be bound by WP:NORG not merely GNG, the sourcing requirements will be tough. The article (if...

from party website. Other sources are routine coverages. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NORG. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 04:37, 23 January 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:NORG and WP:MILL. Ordinary company. Bearian (talk) 20:57, 3 January 2023 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG just another ordinary...

sufficient independent, secondary sources to establish notability under WP:NORG Seraphim System (talk) 20:39, 30 June 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

The result was delete. Consensus that it doesn't establish notability per NORG Nosebagbear (talk) 22:15, 11 February 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No significant coverage in independent sources found, WP:NORG fail (t · c) buidhe 02:04, 12 October 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I'm concerned that this might not pass WP:NORG, in particular WP:ORGCRIT, which requires significant coverage in multiple...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. Article is on a regional airline that operates six small executive...

finding enough in-depth sources about this group to justify a keep under WP:NORG. I've looked on GNews, GBooks, Newspapers.com, PubMed and only found one...

teaches people who to surf and do hip-hop dancing. So it has to pass WP:NORG. Which it clearly doesn't since all the references in the article are either...

Secondary school article does not meet GNG or NORG. BEFORE showed nothing that indicates it meets GNG or NORG. Souces in article are a brief mention and...

WP:NBUILDING. Search only gives promotional press statements. This temple fails WP:NORG. No asserted notability or indication why this temple is notable to have...

because I agree with you that it should be about WP:NORG, not WP:GEOSCOPE. Say we make it purely about WP:NORG, then what sources do we have left that actually...

insufficient coverage in reliable independent sources to meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG. Tayi Arajakate Talk 10:53, 11 March 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

similar case to this AfD. I am concerned that this does not meet WP:GNG, WP:NORG or WP:NBUILD. References are just passing mentions, database listings and...

is a sensible option, as it stands the topic is not notable and fails WP:NORG. HighKing++ 15:31, 25 July 2022 (UTC) Keep In addition to the source mentioned...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. Article is basically puffery. A recently (2020) founded organisation...

discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:32, 1 April 2020 (UTC) Delete per GNG and NORG. This is the coverage I could find: [1] has minor coverage of of the channel...

but no significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Fails WP:NORG Vexations (talk) 20:21, 30 December 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

organization. Other than that, there are simply mentions. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. Onel5969 TT me 14:12, 13 December 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

about it so far. I'd like there to be one this time based on WP:GNG and WP:NORG. Instead of people who vote keep just citing a no longer valid standard or...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG No evidence of any national or regional coverage or any particular historic...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable organization that fails WP:NORG as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent...

removed because "secondary schools." When they are not inherently notable per NORG and SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Something the person who removed the PROD seemed to have...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG. Cannot find any reliable secondary sources to establish notability of subject...

JSTOR · TWL) A youth group that does not appear to pass the WP:GNG or WP:NORG. Currently, the only sources being used in the article are from the group's...

discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:22, 15 December 2021 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NORG is almost entirely dependent upon primary sources - concur with nom, this...

matters that much). So, it's not automatically notable and therefore WP:NORG applies. Sourcing wise, the article has zero references and doing a BEFORE...

list of operating certificate holders but nothing that helps this pass WP:NORG. Fails WP:GNG. Chetsford (talk) 15:09, 20 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

(UTC) Delete Since the school is clearly not notable and therefore fails WP:NORG. Powerful Karma (talk) 14:41, 22 May 2021 (UTC) Delete All I was able to...

JSTOR · TWL) All of the sources are routine coverage. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 21:19, 14 January 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No claim to any notability. Fails WP:NORG. Deleted in Russian Wikipedia. Mitte27 (talk) 12:15, 29 January 2020 (UTC)...

page creator. Virtually no coverage (Google source search, fails both WP:NORG and WP:GNG. DrStrauss talk 14:21, 30 September 2017 (UTC) Comment, there...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable organization, fails WP:NORG. Störm (talk) 19:21, 22 March 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Seems to fail WP:NORG. There is one good source -- [1], but the rest are mere lists of various...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG. Has failed to receive any significant coverage in independent reliable references...

discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:35, 6 October 2019 (UTC) Soft delete. Fails WP:NORG. Not sure if anything is mergable to the list of acquisitions by Google,...

within spitting distance of meeting WP:NORG. --Dom from Paris (talk) 14:55, 28 May 2019 (UTC) Delete Doesn't meet NORG. --qedk (t 桜 c) 16:08, 28 May 2019...

secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Does not pass WP:NORG as there are no WP:RS to support. DMySon (talk) 03:24, 3 October 2021 (UTC)...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG, lack of reliable sources. Press release-like writing doesn't help. ~~ AirshipJungleman29...

JSTOR · TWL) Nothing notable about this private military college. Fails WP:NORG. Störm (talk) 21:35, 17 March 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Highly doubt this passes WP:NORG. Non-notable student club at U of T, can't find any references. Chess (talk)...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No coverage for this org. Fails WP:NORG. Alternatively, redirect to FAST-NU. Störm (talk) 15:43, 20 November 2017...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No claim to any notability. Fails WP:NORG. Mitte27 (talk) 22:14, 16 December 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

WP:GNG or WP:NORG. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:20, 1 June 2021 (UTC) Delete: per nom. Nothing notable based on the WP criteria (GNG and NSCHOOL and NORG). Kolma8...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG. Searching for source WP:BEFORE, I only found sources talking about a co-founder...

2022 (UTC) Delete - Not a single non-primary source. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. The ⬡ Bestagon[t][c] 07:27, 29 December 2022 (UTC) Delete, does not meet...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG / WP:NSCHOOL. Sources in article and WP:BEFORE are not WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV...

the existence of this organisation is its website. It therefore fails WP:NORG AND WP:GNG. It is not listed by the Ministry of Education and Research (Estonia)...

important claims of fact are entirely unsourced. Subject appears to fail WP:NORG. Generally I have a fairly low bar for political parties. If it exists and...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG. Of the sources currently in the article: Source 1 is a brief database entry...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) All sources are routine coverages. It fails WP:GNG, WP:NORG. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 11:39, 25 January 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable University. Fails wp:NSCHOOL & Wp:NORG. Zuck28 (talk) 10:19, 20 July 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

Unsourced article, my search found no sources that would count towards WP:NORG (t · c) buidhe 19:36, 26 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

Nepal (strong hunch, but not sure), and so it should be required to meet WP:NORG too, in my opinion. But that would be a question for when it is shown to...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NSCHOOL this article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG. WP:BEFORE revealed only WP:ROUTINE coverage and brief mentions, nothing...

secondary sources, so they cannot meet ORGCRIT. In any case, NORG generally overrides GNG as NORG is a subject specific notability guideline, although in both...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Clear WP:NORG failure. None of the sources in the article are significant coverage - the...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable organization; fails WP:NORG for lack of WP:SIGCOV of the organization in WP:SIRS. It's good at getting...

Kleuske (talk) 13:16, 2 July 2019 (UTC) Delete Comes nowhere near meeting WP:NORG. The independent source does not mention this organisation. The other is...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG. The sources provided in the article don't meet WP:SIRS and the article as...

unnotable. ser! (chat to me). 17:05, 22 February 2021 (UTC) Delete: Fails NORG. JavaHurricane 18:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC) Delete per Ser!. GhostDestroyer100...

mentions and press releases. No indication of meeting GNG, much less WP:NORG. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:59, 28 December 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

articles about other things. So, this doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG or WP:NORG. Secondary schools aren't inherently notability either. --Adamant1 (talk)...

unaccredited seminary has an inactive website and does not pass WP:GNG or WP:NORG. All the (scant) sources in the article are to its own webpages or to affiliated...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Primary schools rarely meet WP:NORG or WP:GNG; this appears no different. Half of the article is about a church...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG. The only alive source that isn't run-of-the-mill is the Irish Times one...

WP:BEFORE ;) --LordPeterII (talk) 20:41, 11 August 2022 (UTC) Keep Meets WP:NORG thanks to the sources found by LordPeterII. MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:54, 12 August...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Sources are too weak to show that this company passes WP:NORG. Tagged over a year ago as needing more sources to show it meets notability...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No in-depth coverage even after its disfunction. Fails WP:NORG. Greenbörg (talk) 16:04, 4 September 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This commercial primary school with 50 students fails WP:NORG and WP:NOTADVERT. The references are blatant advertisements, as is our article...

advertortorially-toned page on an unremarkable non-profit. Does not meet WP:NORG; significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is passing mentions and...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence this organization (radio station?) passes WP:NORG/GNG. Linked Dutch wiki article is a bit longer but not better referenced...

couldn't find any sources in a BEFORE that would pass either WP:GNG or WP:NORG, and secondary schools are not inherently notable per the RfC about them...

Only two references. Of them one from party website. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 04:32, 23 January 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

Mississippi 03:29, 11 December 2021 (UTC) delete schools need to qualify either WP:NORG, or WP:GNG. Existence is not notability. —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No claim to any notability. Fails WP:NORG. Deleted in Russian Wikipedia. Mitte27 (talk) 23:34, 23 February 2020 (UTC)...

NSCHOOL. Nothing even close to the depth of coverage required to pass WP:NORG, therefore, there is simply no alternative but to delete. Powerful Karma...

there (created by the same user). I'm not seeing sufficient coverage for WP:NORG, in particular WP:ORGDEPTH is not met as the coverage that I can find is...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) NGOs have a hard time meeting WP:NORG/GNG and this is not an exception. The article is primarily sourced to organization...

delete the subject fails notability criteria for organisations (NORG). For testing NORG, I applied the guidelines provided in WP:ORGCRIT (which in turn...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:15, 31 August 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG and WP:BRANCH. I see a number of passing mentions and one source covering...

funerals, helped with books etc. I agree none of these pass the criteria of WP:NORG so am striking my keep, not going to vote Delete though as I think they are...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not pass WP:NORG as there are no WP:RS to support. The references in the list are either primary...

JSTOR · TWL) No evidence of WP:N. Subject appears to fail both WP:GNG and WP:NORG. Unable to find evidence of in depth coverage by multiple independent reliable...

consensus in 2010. Frankly I think the original nom was correct - this fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. There is coverage, but it is strictly routine local coverage...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG. This org was set up to pass Prop 127 in the 2018 elections and has had no...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No coverage found. Fails WP:NORG. Störm (talk) 19:25, 25 February 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NORG. SITH (talk) 18:54, 29 December 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG. Cannot find any proof that this league ever played a game. Rogermx (talk)...

while at PA West. Lacks in-depth independent coverage, does not meet WP:NORG. MB 20:02, 31 August 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in...

this notice. Thanks, MelanieN (talk) 00:08, 1 April 2020 (UTC) Delete per NORG. Could not find any sources about the subject. [1], from the article, appears...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article clearly fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. The party also gets very ignorable amount of votes in two general...

(talk) 04:26, 16 September 2020 (UTC) Delete: Article does not pass GNG or NORG. Sources in the article do not establish notability and BEFORE showed only...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails to meet WP:N or WP:NORG, the only references include passing mentions at best. As the organisation...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG all the sources are affiliated and nothing was found in a before search....

"secondary schools." When secondary schools are not inherently notable per NORG and SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Something the person who removed the PROD seemed to have...

rarely notable, as they do not generate coverage sufficient for WP:GNG/WP:NORG. I have proposed a merger of this to Gdańsk University of Technology, but...

sources. Additionally, WP:NORG is not satisfied. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 16:46, 10 December 2024 (UTC) Delete per nom. WP:GNG and WP:NORG are not met. As noted by...

Spider) 11:18, 26 January 2021 (UTC) Delete and salt - failed WP:NORG back in 2020 and fails NORG now Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:26, 26 January 2021 (UTC)...

Private schools are not inherently notable and therefore have to pass WP:NORG. More so if they are secondary schools. Given that, the basis for keeping...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not clear that it passes WP:GNG and WP:NORG. I haven't done a thorough WP:BEFORE, but this article would require a total...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A wing of a political party that fails WP:NORG due to lack of significant independent coverage in reliable media. This subset...

had this much. I was considering weak delete, given it needs to meet WP:NORG, but decided to opt for neutral instead. Nosebagbear (talk) 22:36, 29 August...

(talk) 17:43, 20 August 2021 (UTC) Speedy keep. In addition to the pass of WP:NORG discussed above, this is one of nine likely bad-faith nominations in reaction...

stringent lately. In the page's current state it look towards failing WP:NORG. I can't seem to find anything substantial about the gym itself. All I can...

Declined a few times at WP:AfC. Creator continues to create this article. WP:NORG failure still not addressed; brief quotes from the president do not amount...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG - one of the two sources is a primary source and the other is a local newspaper...

discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 20:55, 23 August 2017 (UTC) Delete per nom, fails WP:NORG and specifically WP:ORGDEPTH. --Muhandes (talk) 20:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)...

to find any sources showing WP:ORGDEPTH so I believe that this fails WP:NORG. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:04, 10 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

Communist party. Provided sources fail to demonstrate the requirements of WP:NORG. Could not find any reliable sources covering this party after a Bing search...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No claim to any notability. Fails WP:NORG. Possible PR/promo, created from single account (possible sock puppet). Long...

sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:NORG. Minor coverage, passing mentions and some quotes. JbhTalk 21:18, 8 November...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not pass WP:NONPROFIT, WP:NORG. Currently sources do not pass WP:ORGDEPTH as many are local papers, local...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NORG failure. Graywalls (talk) 05:24, 17 August 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

significant coverage about the company, that manages to make it pass WP:NORG but somehow, I am not confident enough about my search.Trivial mentions are...

Delete For an academic institution to be notable, it has to pass GNG or WP:NORG in general. This one fails that. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG / WP:NSCHOOL. Sources in article and WP:BEFORE are not WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG / WP:NSCHOOL. Sources in article and WP:BEFORE are not WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV...

this is clearly a non-notable school. So, it not surprisingly fails WP:NORG and the article should therefore be deleted. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:22, 28...

and primary. Plus, I couldn't find anything in-depth or that would pass WP:NORG about it when I looked. Let alone WP:GNG. The main section of the article...

delete the subject fails notability criteria for organisations (NORG). For testing NORG, I applied the guidelines provided in WP:ORGCRIT (which in turn...

promotional article at the hand of public relations editing account. Fails WP:NORG after a quick WP:BEFORE check. Graywalls (talk) 05:29, 27 June 2025 (UTC)...

Thoroughly fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. Sal2100 (talk) 17:38, 6 August 2022 (UTC) Delete unable to locate any references that meet WP:NORG's criteria for establishing...

mention in this news item, but beyond that only the usual listings. Fails WP:NORG / WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 07:02, 21 October 2019 (UTC) Delete per WP:SNOW. Unaccredited...

delete the subject fails notability criteria for organisations (NORG). For testing NORG, I applied the guidelines provided in WP:ORGCRIT (which in turn...

WP:BEFORE check doesn't yield sufficient in-depth independent sources to pass WP:NORG. The interview cited in the article would not be considered an independent...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable organization, fails WP:NORG. Störm (talk) 19:32, 22 March 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

stub. It certainly was not created by Andrew Welch. Merge and redirect. Norg 13:45, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC) Creation history shows that it was probably created...

either. Chetsford (talk) 07:52, 2 January 2019 (UTC) Delete: does not meet WP:NORG; significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:03, 3 January 2019...

organization does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for organizations (WP:NORG) or the general notability guideline (WP:GNG). While the organization has...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG. The only reliable sources provide only incidental coverage of this place...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) NN building & company. Fails WP:NORG. UtherSRG (talk) 15:05, 7 June 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

(talk) 01:25, 17 May 2019 (UTC) Delete. Notwithstanding any issues with WP:NORG and WP:GNG, the article meets the criteria speedy for deletion WP:G11. (In...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG Could be notable but cannot find a single SICOV source for Biospine or the...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG. Many churches are notable because they're listed on the NRHP. This one is...

like a spam/ad (WP:ADVERT), about a website/company which does not meet WP:NORG or WP:WEB. nafSadh did say 16:45, 14 May 2015 (UTC) Withdrawn per sources...

discussions. Qualitist (talk) 15:04, 27 January 2019 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NORG. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:21, 27 January 2019...

from all over the country, renowned and celebrated critics...". Fails WP:NORG notable WP:ORGDEPTH as this is incidental coverage. This is WP:TOOSOON Dom...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. Two sources is not enough to show WP:GNG or WP:NORG and a search for sources turned up partial matches...

coverage in reliable sources to improve this to our standards. Fails WP:NORG. Bradv🍁 15:03, 18 March 2019 (UTC) The primary source that was used Bradv...

is a rough consensus that the school is notable under WP:GNG or even WP:NORG. Two of the deleting !votes (includes nomination) are based on the promotional...

have changed. Organizations are now subject to the somewhat more strict WP:NORG due to the propensity of spam. Arguing that "this was kept in 2013, so it...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not pass WP:NORG. Mentioned in passing in some articles but no sigcov outside of non-independent...

which contested one election in 1972 and received 0.5% of the vote. Fails WP:NORG. AusLondonder (talk) 23:30, 26 April 2022 (UTC) Keep The party held a seat...

really feel like going into the nuances of why I think this has to pass WP:NORG, but IMO it does. In the meantime, looking over the references there are...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn’t meet WP:NORG, found no useful sources that were of a non-promotional variety in reliable...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable pizza chain; doesn't satisfy WP:NORG or WP:SIGCOV. The current references are trivial and/or repeated from press...

not tougher than GNG: it just says the school must meet GNG or NORG. If it meets NORG, it will automatically meet GNG, so (in my opinion) it might as...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I see no evidence this passes WP:NORG. Paradoctor (talk) 15:17, 16 January 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

references here, while providing minimal coverage, do not rise to the level of WP:NORG. We have no room for any more advertisements around here. MediaKyle (talk)...

releases, not independent content at all. 0/10 effort there. Massive WP:NORG fail; no evidence of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary...

here satisfying the WP:AUD part of WP:NORG. Opening announcements and list inclusions are clearly routine per WP:NORG. This is going to be kept because of...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Contested PROD. Non-notable political party, fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. Curbon7 (talk) 13:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG. It's notability cannot be inherited from working with some notable artists...

dream of Maple (talk) 06:45, 30 November 2019 (UTC) Delete: does not meet WP:NORG / WP:ORGDEPTH. Sufficiently obscure that a redirect is not needed. Nothing...

suitable sources were found. Overall, I do not believe that the criteria in WP:NORG have been met for this subject. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:10, 30 April...

January 2018 (UTC) Delete -- WP:ADVOCACY for a nn group; does not meet WP:NORG and significant RS coverage not found. Basically, org spam. K.e.coffman (talk)...

([1], [2]), but I agree with nom that there's nothing suggesting GNG or NORG here. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 05:20, 24 October 2020 (UTC) Keep -...

truly reliable and independent 2) [2] is a marketing trade journal, and per NORG/RS trade journals are often problematic sources (too often they are "pay...

2026 (UTC) Delete. No sourcing indicating notability. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. ExperiencedEditor3 (talk) 13:50, 8 June 2026 (UTC) An experienced admin...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A promotional artcle for a non notable company. Fails WP:NORG and WP:ORGDEPTH. All references are primary sources. Hagennos ❯❯❯ Talk 02:41...

Delete - listed in databases such as this one but the coverage is far from WP:NORG quality Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:24, 19 April 2021 (UTC) Spiderone at...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Seems to be a fail of WP:NORG. Sourced solely to the website, a search elsewhere turns up a few passing...

WP:SIGCOV of this charitable organization in WP:SIRS for a pass of WP:GNG or WP:NORG. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

listing? Irish Times Spiderone 12:52, 30 November 2020 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NORG. Might be something in here that's notable, but it's not currently in this...

found by AllyD, I found a few passing mentions, but not enough to meet WP:NORG. The article itself is badly written from a WP:MOS point of view, and sourced...

notable. Especially independently funded ones. So this needs to pass WP:NORG. Which it clearly doesn't since the article only has a single primary reference...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NORG -- organization has not "received significant coverage in multiple reliable...

13:07, 21 August 2020 (UTC) Delete per nom. No sources to be found. Fails WP:NORG/WP:GNG. SD0001 (talk) 13:39, 21 August 2020 (UTC) Delete - as per WP:NSCHOOL...

"how it works" type advert). And, the subject does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG (the limited sources that are available are trivial/passing-mentions in which...

anything beyond routine local coverage, and thus it doesn't seem to pass WP:NORG. Ovinus (talk) 18:35, 4 January 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

Thanks, Sandstein 12:31, 27 February 2020 (UTC) Delete The article fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 04:20, 28 February 2020 (UTC) Keep...

logs | views) Star Mississippi 02:06, 17 October 2022 (UTC) Delete both wp:norg fail, significant coverage not found. (t · c) buidhe 07:56, 17 October 2022...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject does not appear to meet the WP:NORG. The only source currently in the article is the organizations website, while...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't seem to meet WP:NORG, despite having notable members in Earle, and Wadhams. Sources in the article...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subsidiary organisation does not seem to meet WP:NORG- lacks coverage in independent WP:RS and notability is inherited from the...

the school's website. No neutral sources are used as this clearly fails WP:NORG and GNG. The article almost feels it is written in a promotional manner than...

Thanks, Salvio giuliano 08:45, 6 September 2025 (UTC) Delete — Fails WP:NORG. Sources are routine and don't give independent depth on the company. EmilyR34...

although CURL fails WP:GNG due to source independence issues, it passes WP:NORG due to the continuing coverage of its research. — BillHPike (talk, contribs)...

Democratic Party of Virginia. Consensus is that the subject does not meet WP:NORG. While editors have noted the existence of reliable sources mentioning the...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Can't find any coverage that meets WP:NORG. Best I could find is some churnalism in trade magazines ([1], [2], [3])...

the old WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES debate, I'd argue this school appears to meet WP:NORG through the coverage found by SportingFlyer. There may need to be a look...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No WP:SIGCOV and thus fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. Propose redirecting to Evangelical Lutheran Church in America...

(UTC) Delete this is a private institution and therefore has to pass WP:NORG. Which it clearly doesn't due to the lack of good sources. So from my perspective...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I have major concerns this organization fails WP:NORG. I prodded it and it was improved a bit but per my post from the article's...

nom. fails WP:NORG--DBigXray 12:17, 29 July 2018 (UTC) Delete Despite a modest amount of local coverage over the years, fails WP:NORG.E.M.Gregory (talk)...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This organization fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. After removing all the non-RS citations and the advertising from the article...

do not see how this conference event meets WP:SIGCOV or WP:NEVENT or WP:NORG. We barely have enough sources to support the text, not to mind supporting...

advertisement relying on primary sources, paid sources. Does not satisfy NSCHOOLS/NORG. This is not a degree awarding tertiary institute and has no inherent notability...

published by a political party for only two months before election. Fails WP:NORG DBigXrayᗙ 06:33, 3 February 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

There's was nothing in a BEFORE that isn't extremely trivial or would pass WP:NORG either. So, I'm going with delete. Unless someone can come up with three...

signifcant enough to meet NORG, hence I would have to agree with the nominator. Golem08 (talk) 18:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NORG, WP:NOTINHERITED,...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) NN private college that fails WP:NORG. Previously prod-denied in 2007, though it had received the prod-support...

in an article about long hair. Which doesn't cut it WP:GNG. Let alone WP:NORG. Which IMO would be the proper notability guideline since this is not a mainstream...

failing WP:GNG miserably. I could not locate any references in WP:RS. Fails WP:NORG as well. And creator's olny contributions have been to edit this page; possible...

5), non-SIGCOV database, or routine WP:NORG failing routine announcements primarily quotes. Therefore, WP:NORG is failed, WP:BEFORE did not find additional...

noted that embassies are not inherently notable. Fails WP:NBUILDING / WP:NORG / WP:GEOFEAT. Dan arndt (talk) 01:52, 24 March 2021 (UTC) Merge/Redirect...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Organization fails WP:NORG. GTrang (talk) 04:06, 25 May 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

TWL) Non-notable company. Only newslistings are blogs and zines; fails WP:NORG. Even then, the references are passing and in no way in depth; this lack...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG and specifically no WP:ORGDEPTH, all sources routine anouncements of course...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) per WP:NOPROMO and it may fail WP:NORG. Amigao (talk) 17:49, 14 September 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

of mentions but nothing indicative of sigcov to establish GNG, much less NORG. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:24, 21 September 2022 (UTC) (cut the following from...

org/w/index.php?title=Audacious_Inquiry&oldid=878321113 Does not meet WP:NORG, all coverage appears to either be routine business press (hirings and firings...

sources which discuss this particular organization in detail enough for WP:NORG. Their vulture program[1][2][3] and birding app[4][5] in particular both...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG. Sources in the article are not secondary WP:RS, just press releases or reporting...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG and WP:NSCHOOL. Per NSCHOOL, universities have no presumed notability and must meet NORG through significant independent...

online or offline exists, leading me to believe this is a clear failure of WP:NORG or a hoax. SITH (talk) 19:09, 31 December 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG, WP:GNG Hemant DabralTalk 21:56, 9 March 2020 (UTC) Automated comment: This...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable school, fails WP:NORG. Störm (talk) 14:49, 20 January 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

sphere of influence. A quick WP:BEFORE didn't find sources suggesting WP:NORG is met, in particular WP:AUD. A lot of local regions have local trade organizations...

Delete Catastrophic WP:NORG failure. WP:ITEXISTS applies. BhikhariInformer (talk) 03:37, 5 March 2026 (UTC) Delete. Fails to meet WP:NORG. RangersRus (talk)...

single source is primary and I could not find sufficient sourcing to meet WP:NORG * Pppery * it has begun... 17:50, 1 July 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

unable to find anything in a WP:BEFORE that would pass either WP:GNG or WP:NORG. As an alternative to deletion it could be merged or redirected to Francistown...

secondary sources by Binging the French or English name of the party. Fails WP:NORG. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 19:24, 18 December...

evidence that it meets WP:NORG (t · c) buidhe 23:48, 5 November 2020 (UTC) Delete: Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG / WP:NSCHOOL. Sources in article...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NORG due to a lack of in-depth coverage in secondary sources. I considered a redirect...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) All sources are routine coverages. It fails WP:GNG, WP:NORG. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 11:36, 25 January 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG and WP:NOTINHERITED. Run of the mill political party / forum founded by Tapan...

indication of passing WP:NORG. Renata (talk) 13:55, 25 February 2020 (UTC) Delete The airline clearly isn't notable by the WP:NORG standards and things don't...

before this was directly created in the main space. It does not pass WP:NORG or WP:GNG. Mekomo (talk) 15:54, 24 September 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

(talk) 04:55, 28 July 2020 (UTC) Delete Due to it failing WP:GNG and WP:NORG. Since all the sources seem to involve people connected to the company and...

are sufficient to pass WP:NORG / WP:GNG? Thanks, Wham2001 (talk) 11:15, 17 January 2021 (UTC) Delete: Fails to meet WP:NORG, perhaps redirecting to Unravel...

sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) NORG fail. No non-primary source coverage. Fermiboson (talk) 01:16, 1 December...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. A search for sources only turned up primary sources or unreliable sources...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The school existed, but it didn't satisfy WP:NORG. The school have some passing coverage based on a WP:BEFORE search such as...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) On its face, it fails WP:NORG. Bbb23 (talk) 19:48, 9 June 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

2018 (UTC) Delete unfortunately it doesn't look like this charity passes WP:NORG. I am having difficulty finding reliable secondary sources. SportingFlyer...

assertion thst schools must pass NORG is 100% false. A secondary school is considered notable if it meets either GNG or NORG. It clearly meets GNG, but I'd...

FaceBook page, a YouTube video, and a couple of Wikipedia scrapes. Fails WP:NORG. Narky Blert (talk) 19:22, 11 February 2018 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...

(I will try to figure out a way to do so). But, in any case, doesn't WP:NORG require multiple independent RS that have independent content? If it's an...

restaurant is currently closed - not reflected in the article. Does not meet WP:NORG, lack of in-depth independent coverage. MB 03:33, 7 August 2022 (UTC) Note:...

applicable subject-specific guideline for an organization such as Novus is WP:NORG, and that none of the criteria specified in that guideline are met, since...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This company does not meet WP:NORG as it is known only as owning the People's Archive of Rural India. There...

type, I think) notable? I see only mentions in passing. Seems to fail WP:NORG/WP:GNG. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:40, 5 July 2020...

2021 (UTC) Delete. Not seeing how WP:NWEB (for the software/plugins), WP:NORG (for the organisation that builds the software) or WP:GNG (in general) are...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. Article's sources are nothing but press releases and blogs from the company...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication of meeting WP:GNG or WP:NORG. Searches in Sinhala yielded Lankadeepa, a mention in an exhaustive listing...

result was keep. Consensus to keep based on article passing WP:ORGCRITE / WP:NORG. (non-admin closure) Ifnord (talk) 19:19, 6 January 2019 (UTC) [Hide this...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Clearly fails WP:NORG, no WP:SIGCOV and is currently written in a highly WP:PROMO style. My search...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I believe this fails WP:NORG. Aside from the promotional tone, most of the references appear to be press...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:AUD of WP:NORG - sources listed on talk page [1] and [2] are student newspapers of limited...

indiscriminate indexes, has no impact factor, and is seldom cited or quoted. Fails WP:NORG and WP:NJOURNALS. Worldbruce (talk) 19:17, 12 January 2023 (UTC) Note: This...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG. Sources are all routine local coverage for a secondary school. MB 00:56...

performed at this institution [1]. The citations are sufficient to pass WP:NORG. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 19:40, 30 August 2018 (UTC) those are just...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Advertising. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. The Banner talk 10:32, 27 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

I wasn't able to find sources to cite the content of the article or pass NORG, except one article from 2008 [1]. Spudlace (talk) 23:15, 7 August 2022 (UTC)...

of many examples Jeepday (talk) 18:16, 2 April 2021 (UTC) Keep. Meets WP:NORG (the relevant guideline) and the WP:GNG. I'm a bit puzzled about this nomination...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG; no significant coverage about this organization from third-party sources...

required to pass WP:NORG or even WP:GNG. As per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, a school is not notable simply because it exists and it clearly says on NORG that schools...

reliable sources. Evidences found to meet WP:NORG. Orbit578 (talk) 05:01, 15 July 2025 (UTC) Keep Page meets WP:NORG requirements through several independent...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NORG, WP:Notability, and WP:Permastub, and following the lead of User:Piotrus...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This wrestling promotion does not appear to meet WP:NORG. All the sources in the article are either self-published or based on press...

May 2021 (UTC) Delete Just an advert for a non notable society, fails WP:NORG. Theroadislong (talk) 13:41, 31 May 2021 (UTC) Comment Well, I know OTHERSTUFFEXISTS...

(distænt write) 17:58, 14 January 2018 (UTC) Delete -- does not meet WP:NORG; coverage is passing mentions or self-promotion. The coverage includes: KQED-Dec...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PROD concern was Does not pass WP:NORG; I was not able to find any independent, secondary sources addressing this...

to find decent sources, even when searching in Sinhala. No evidence of WP:NORG or WP:GNG. Best source I can find is Wijeya (translated), which mentions...

can't even find one reference from a reliable & independent source; fails WP:NORG. If this organisation exists, it's certainly not notable. Spiderone(Talk...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. Article on an airline that existed for three years and operated...

in reliable sources appears to exist, causing this to fail WP:GNG and WP:NORG. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 12:38, 16 April 2018 (UTC) Delete per nom. Searches...

would fall under the purview of the stricter NORG rather than simply GNG; it has been tagged as a potential NORG failure since September 2025. (No opinion...

notability as per WP:NORG? Perhaps the better alternative is to create an article about a company based in Gomel satisfying WP:NORG, which I'm sure there...

TWL) Deprodded without explanation. A non-notable local museum; fails WP:NORG. As WP:NGO notes, local organizations are notable only if they have attracted...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NORG, lacks significant, independent, reliable and secondary coverage with in...

the organization itself. From a cursory search online, appears to fail WP:NORG ᴸᵃᶠᶠʸTaffer💬(they/she) 21:16, 10 March 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The school existed, but the school didn't pass WP:NORG. The school didn't have any notability for inclusion to Wikipedia. Thank...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NORG failure. The 6 six citations are actually from 3 sources, which are primarily...

(talk) 18:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC) Delete: Not notable; fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. Article has several citations, none of which count towards notability (WP:ORGDEPTH)...

TWL) Non-notable school. No WP:RS and unlikely any exist. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NORG. Cabrils (talk) 02:12, 25 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence this meets notability requirements of WP:NORG AusLondonder (talk) 22:02, 28 February 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable political party. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. Curbon7 (talk) 03:32, 26 April 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

and Nevada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:39, 2 January 2025 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:NORG and poor sourcing. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 12:28,...

being said, I saw no evidence of this organisation meeting WP:GNG or WP:NORG; no evidence of WP:SIRS during a search. Spiderone 14:31, 20 December 2020...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Nothing notable about the org. Fails WP:NORG. Störm (talk) 10:37, 4 April 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No WP:SIGCOV, appears to fail WP:NORG. Mariamnei ✦ reach out 🕊️ 10:43, 8 June 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion...

like WP:NORG. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 22:07, 9 January 2021 (UTC) Delete - very surprised that the PROD was removed. Clear WP:GNG and WP:NORG failure...

PRODed this claiming Sources are all primary. Does not appear to meet WP:NORG. On second thought, this is probably ineligible for PROD due to Wikipedia:Articles...

February 2022 (UTC) Delete Simply doesn't doesn't meet WP:GNG, let along WP:NORG. Jmertel23 (talk) 23:35, 26 February 2022 (UTC) Keep tom much of a stub to...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG and WP:NOTADVERTISING this article has already been speedy deleted as advertising...

run of the mill Cornell club. Doesn't seem to have gotten coverage to meet NORG. [Should note here that I attend Cornell, though I have no connection to...

Delete - Nothing out there as far as references that can show WP:GNG or WP:NORG. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:33, 29 November 2023 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

fails WP:NORG. All primary sources, not a single secondary source in it. Mekomo (talk) 11:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC) Delete: Fails [WP:NORG]. ThatIPEditor...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) NN campus of a university. Fails WP:NORG. The U is itself notable, so a merge/redirect there as an WP:ATD is fine...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Clear fail of WP:NORG per a WP:BEFORE. No identifiable ATD. Longhornsg (talk) 04:36, 5 September...

Shellwood (talk) 17:24, 12 November 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:MILL and WP:NORG. A neighborhood or suburb is often notable; a neighborhood association is...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:MILL institute, fails WP:NSCHOOL, WP:NORG, WP:GNG. Delete or redirect to Baba Farid University of Health Sciences....

deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:18, 15 October 2024 (UTC) Delete: WP:NORG failure. I was unable to find any sources which are independent of the subject...

public ones. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:39, 17 March 2021 (UTC) Delete Peer WP:NORG, along with similar AfDs that resulted in the articles being deleted, an...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication of notability under WP:NORG. A single Primary Source to the school's website. A search of the web brings...

JSTOR · TWL) A newly opened college wants a promotion. Does not pass WP:NORG / WP:GNG, lacks reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject...

(UTC) Merge it into Zurich University of the Arts as above, topic fails NORG on its own. HighKing++ 20:24, 26 July 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is...

individually or in sum these meet the substantial coverage demanded by WP:NORG. In this as in coverage of other artist-run spaces (both at previous AfDs...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Nothing significant in WP:RS. Fails WP:NORG. Störm (talk) 17:35, 6 February 2018 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...

nonprofit in Indiana seems to do good work, I don't think this meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG. What sourcing I can turn up is either passing mentions, not independent...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No claim to any notability. Fails WP:NORG. Deleted in Russian Wikipedia. Mitte27 (talk) 09:06, 12 December 2019 (UTC)...

(UTC) Delete I don't see any indication that this organization meets WP:NORG required notability standard for organizations. Sources don't appear to be...

recycled press releases in sector media, but I don’t think this passes WP:NORG. Mccapra (talk) 13:39, 6 December 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

Since this is a commercial organization, the appropriate guideline is WP:NORG, not just GNG. Restaurants are a difficult topic because there's an entire...

TWL) Every single source is a press-release, I see no evidence of meeting NORG. qcne (talk) 13:01, 5 September 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

Center. There is some coverage, for example this. Possibly not enough for NORG but that doesn't matter. As an improper SPINOUT of University of Tennessee...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails GNG and NORG. Sources in the article are social media listings, a promo interview with...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NORG, WP:Notability, and WP:Permastub, and following the lead of User:Piotrus...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No claim to any notability. Fails WP:NORG. Mitte27 (talk) 13:46, 23 December 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

(UTC) Delete. Not enough coverage in reliable independent sources to meet WP:NORG/WP:SIRS. Jfire (talk) 01:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

TWL) Unreferenced article about a Russian NGO. Does not seem to meet WP:NORG/WP:GNG. PS. Ru article suggests wrong interwiki - the article there is about...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Potentially fails WP:NORG here; in particular, WP:ORGDEPTH. I found a passing BBC mention, the Teignmouth...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG. Scoria (talk) 07:50, 25 December 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable local organization fails WP:NORG. There's no WP:SIGCOV in secondary, independent, reliable sources. Sources...

the article. See also NORG's alternate criteria and WP:NSCHOOLS, which exempt not-for-profit schools from the requirements of NORG. This article does need...

trade journals and worse (press release/marketing sources). Seems to fail WP:NORG]. See also WP:CORPSPAM. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here...

largely edited by users with possible COIs. So, I see nothing that passes WP:NORG about this or anything else that would be in favor of there being an article...

sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:NORG. Unsourced and I find no English language coverage. Maybe there are Korean...

(T•C•G•E) 20:20, 23 July 2017 (UTC) Delete. Does not appear to pass either NORG or the GNG. I cannot find any indication of significant coverage in multiple...

organization more than fulfills the notability requirement according to WP:NORG. An organization that operates as a coalition of 70+ civil society organizations...

the US government, I'm not sure whether it's appropriate to judge it by WP:NORG (which it certainly fails). If we are to merely judge it against WP:GNG,...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unsourced WP:NORG. A WP:BEFORE search shows they have a notable publication, but I couldn't...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOPROMO and also appears to fail WP:NORG. Amigao (talk) 00:51, 24 April 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been...

Delete Mentions in secondary sources are trivial. No indication of passing WP:NORG. Triptothecottage (talk) 07:31, 3 July 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subsidiary doesn't seem to meet WP:NORG - lacks independent coverage meeting the WP:ORGDEPTH thresholds. MrsSnoozyTurtle...

GNG, "routine local news" sources count toward notability. According to WP:NORG, The scope of this guideline covers all groups of people organized together...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG and WP:NSCHOOL; private universities have no presumed notability and must meet NORG through significant independent...

project'. Likely failed, and likely never achieved notability. Fails WP:NORG. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:53, 12 September...

did not find anything helpful. This college does not meet WP:GNG and WP:NORG. Numis Zuhair (talk) 16:28, 7 January 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

SCHOOLOUTCOMES on this one, though, since SCHOOLOUTCOMES directly references WP:NORG which is very clear that the school is not notable simply because it exists...

12 May 2025 (UTC) Delete - As a private school, the relevant SNG is WP:NORG. We need significant coverage at WP:ORGDEPTH in independent reliable secondary...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject does not appear to meet the WP:NORG due to a lack of significant coverage. While the article technically 'survived'...

institutions#Jharkhand 2, where it's listed, under WP:ATD-R. Fails in GNG, WP:NORG as well as WP:NSCHOOL. My BEFORE didn't yield any RS with SIGCOV. Just social...

showed up anyway). No evidence that this is a notable organization, fails WP:NORG, only has routine coverage. Fram (talk) 09:21, 24 May 2022 (UTC) Keep for...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No claim to any notability. Fails WP:NORG. Mitte27 (talk) 08:27, 11 December 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:11, 12 January 2020 (UTC) Note: This...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Lack of SIGCOV, failing to meet WP:NORG & WP:GNG. Zuck28 (talk) 00:58, 3 April 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:NORG. All sources are affiliated or a student blog. Dom from Paris (talk) 15:07...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Poorly written. Fails WP:NORG. Störm (talk) 13:54, 13 December 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

relocated to London and closed down after two further seasons. Fails GNG/NORG. (The related article Marco Aponte is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) non-notable political party fails WP:NORG (t · c) buidhe 04:05, 20 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

22:50, 22 April 2022 (UTC) Political parties operate under WP:NORG, not WP:NPOL. NORG explicitly states that "No company or organization is considered...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NSCHOOLS which says they must either pass WP:NORG or WP:GNG. This school does not appear to pass any. On a cursory search,...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This organization fails WP:NORG. The only source that is WP:SIGCOV in WP:SIRS is this NY Times article; the...

Newspapers.com, so even if it isn't a hoax, it doesn't look like it meets WP:NORG. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 21:53, 4 April 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unclear if there's enough for WP:NORG. Found this CBS segment but nothing else [1]. There is a similarly named...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unferenced, fails WP:NORG. Not even a website linked, WP:BEFORE reveals mainly references for (not...

community is more skeptical about the independence and significance of WP:NORG coverage now, and two relists have not produced convincing sources. RL0919...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No claim to any notability. Fails WP:NORG. Mitte27 (talk) 15:08, 19 December 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

Delete per WP:NORG. Ping me if you find and add three good sources. Bearian (talk) 11:02, 22 February 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NSPORTS/WP:NORG - most I could...

Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 25 September 2021 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NORG.4meter4 (talk) 05:15, 2 October 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails GNG and NORG. It is a housing society but there is no indication of importance and I cannot...

JSTOR · TWL) Fanclub. There is very little to suggest notability (both for WP:NORG and WP:GNG). Last AfD mentioned press coverage in Dutch, but it seems pretty...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No claim to any notability. Fails WP:NORG. Deleted in Russian and Ukrainian Wikipedia. Mitte27 (talk) 18:12, 12 December...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The subject of this article does not appear to meet WP:NORG. The sources provided fall into the following categories: press releases...

WP:ORGCRIT Ibjaja055 (talk) 07:26, 20 March 2025 (UTC) Delete: Clearly fails WP:NORG.Rimesodom (talk) 11:15, 20 March 2025 (UTC) Comment: Poor guy probably got...

meat on this bone. This article was deleted in June 2025 for not meeting WP:NORG and I'm afraid that it still does not meet that guideline. A significant...

there's something I'm missing, this seems to be a pretty straightforward WP:NORG fail. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:32, 25 November 2022 (UTC) Delete it's...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Poor refs. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. In the last AFD discussion, there was no consensus. Let's figure it out...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Indian pharma retail company, fails WP:NORG; WP:GNG - coverage of routine funding rounds, company announcements. No indepth...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This organisation fails WP:NORG. Sources are none other than routine coverage. GTrang (talk) 04:13, 25 January...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No claim to any notability. Fails WP:NORG. Mitte27 (talk) 13:57, 19 December 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

JSTOR · TWL) Blatantly promotional. Cannot find any sources on this. Fails WP:NORG Rogermx (talk) 22:50, 10 May 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:GNG and WP:NORG – From what I've been able to find, none of the sources passed WP:SIRS since...

find independent coverage about the team, to pass wider requirements of WP:NORG and WP:GNG. The highest to SIGCOV are the sources which says about the announcement...

now blocked. More importantly, there is no sign of passing WP:GNG or WP:NORG. Best I can find in Sinhala searches are The Papare (translated), which mentions...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NORG/WP:NONPROFIT. Local group/Mitzi.humphery article. Graywalls (talk) 21:54...

automatically notably by virtue of being schools. So, this fails both WP:GNG and WP:NORG. Plus, it was created by a single purpose account. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:47...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG. There is no significant, reliable, third-party coverage on this company...

(UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NORG, and blatant advertising. Theroadislong (talk) 11:49, 22 February 2023 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NORG. No notability on WP:BEFORE...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable organization - fails WP:NORG. US-Verified (talk) 00:18, 19 March 2023 (UTC) Delete I made an attempt at...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NORG. Amigao (talk) 00:02, 13 May 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been included...

(talk) 00:19, 11 December 2021 (UTC) delete schools need to qualify either WP:NORG, or WP:GNG. Existence is not notability. —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook...

significant coverage. DMySon (talk) 07:01, 2 November 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NORG per nom. SBKSPP (talk) 00:46, 3 November 2021 (UTC) The above discussion...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG A promotional article for an arts center in a small community. Rogermx (talk)...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG. Insufficient independent in-depth sources to establish notability. Currently...

at WP:NORG. Theroadislong (talk) 14:44, 15 May 2025 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG Tenshi! (Talk page) 13:43, 11 May 2025 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NORG, primary...

detail could be added. Haven't found sufficient sourcing to pass the GNG/NORG. Rupples (talk) 05:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC) Keep , it's a stub article right...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication of WP:NORG notability. C F A 💬 22:48, 30 August 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

(UTC) Keep since passing NORG. The references at Nlwiki, Delpher, and Google Books are substantial and sufficient for NORG. gidonb (talk) 07:27, 14 September...

important in the field of computer science; just above average. Going on the WP:NORG criteria, almost all of the sources in the article are affiliated with the...

TrainDiscuss 03:25, 18 February 2018 (UTC) Delete both Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG Hagennos ❯❯❯ Talk 13:56, 19 February 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

(UTC) SIGCOV must be more than a mention. Indeed, Culturenet must meet WP:NORG as the appropriate SNG. The guidance on SIGCOV may be found under WP:ORGDEPTH...

reckon. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 21:24, 8 September 2025 (UTC) Delete – Fails in WP:NORG. Svartner (talk) 12:56, 9 September 2025 (UTC) Delete seems to be WP:PROMO...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, WP:NORG, WP:SIGCOV. Störm (talk) 19:37, 27 December 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

TWL) Indian school with no secondary sources available at all. Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. SD0001 (talk) 14:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG nothing of note found in a before search. Tagged as not being sourced in...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG, WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 20:47, 1 December 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

and NORG. Neither small-town nor weekly equate to unreliable. 174.212.224.74 (talk) 18:26, 27 December 2022 (UTC) On what grounds, it is meeting NORG ?...

significant independent coverage of the institution itself. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. Statutory recognition by a state government and inclusion on the UGC list...

TWL) No notability for this public charter preparatory school. Fails WP:NORG. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:31, 5 July 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) not seeing NORG met here; coverage includes paragraph here and there, and some press releases...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG at present. Amigao (talk) 03:15, 21 February 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

JSTOR · TWL) Subject lacks the needed coverage to meet the WP:GNG and WP:NORG. Let'srun (talk) 19:46, 17 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

to Spider) 21:19, 8 November 2021 (UTC) Delete. No evidence of passing WP:NORG. Searches did not find anything relevant. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:44, 10...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to satisfy WP:NORG. Although there are a lot of references, all the ones I have checked are...

the section under WP:NORG, which mentions that public colleges are inherently notable. Because WP:NSCHOOL, which is a SSG under NORG, mentions that all...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Consensus fais to meet NORG Nosebagbear (talk) 11:28, 13 December 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

comment: no sources have been presented showing that the subject meets WP:NORG / WP:ORGDEPTH. Asserting that the topic is "significant enough for Wikipedia"...

announcements, press releases and mentions in a few listicles. Fails to satisfy NORG. M4DU7 (talk) 07:58, 10 June 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG, WP:NSCHOOL. Störm (talk) 07:36, 24 November 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG/WP:NORG. The Banner talk 16:19, 16 August 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Just a local religious institution doesn't meet WP:NORG (or WP:NRELORG). Htanaungg (talk) 12:38, 13 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG. Also, entirely promotional and no indication of WP:SUSTAINED notability...

does not meet WP:NORG criteria. Mekomo (talk) 15:27, 17 January 2025 (UTC) Delete or "Merge" to List of political parties in Spain, WP:NORG shows that political...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No coverage found. Fails WP:NORG, WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 20:53, 1 December 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...