User:Wslack/Desk

For AMA business

  1. Wikipedia:Policy Library
WP:LOP
WP:Guidelines
  1. Wikipedia:Resolving Disputes
  2. Foundation issues on Meta
  3. Wikipedia:Copyrights
  4. Wikipedia:General disclaimer
  5. Wikipedia:Civility
  6. Wikipedia:Etiquette
  7. Wikipedia:Assume Good Faith
  8. Wikipedia:No Personal Attacks
  9. WP:LAWYER

AMA business

Hi all, I'm --\/\/slack (talk) with the AMA. I've been looking over this page and its related ones. Here are some observations:

  • Realsched.exe violates NPOV, and contains almost no useful content. As a part of RealPlayer, issues with it should be in the criticism section, with link for both sides of the pro-con argument.
  • There is no reason to call RealPlayer a good audio/video player without a citation. There is also no reason to call it a bad audio/video player without a citation.
  • A reviews section would be helpful with leading reviews from various sources. The "Worst 25" listing would go here.
  • RealAlternative would go under the Criticisms section (which differs from reviews in that it focuses on negative aspects found, as opposed to features, which does positive aspects)
  • Users must keep their personal feelings out of this article. Everything said should be referenced , especially considering what has been said.

Comments

  • A reviews section would be helpful with leading reviews from various sources. The "Worst 25" listing would go here.
  • RealAlternative would go under the Criticisms section (which differs from reviews in that it focuses on negative aspects found, as opposed to features, which does positive aspects)
You mean, it should be three sections: Criticism, Reviews, and Features? Or only Criticisms (negative aspects) and Reviews (positive aspects)? --Urod 15:56, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.